Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

vodafone are trying to extend my contract from 18 to 24 months


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi caggers,

i am having a terrible time being pushed from pillow to post with vodafone customer services.

The short story is that i called them this month to ask for an upgrade only to find that they will not upgrade as they tell me my plan has another 6 months to run.

I have been with them since 2009 and have NEVER had a 24 month contract. My first contract upgraded in July 2011 to what i believe to be an 18 month contract.

I have asked them to send me a copy of my contract and they state they cant as it was a verbal agreement.

now they are asking ME to send them my welcome letter. tit for tat in my opinion as they have nothing to prove a 24 month contract. my plan name is ypl 24ess 600m utx vp vmi.

The 24 does NOT mean 24 month contract as it has never changed from when my original 18 month contract was started.

having received and made several calls and emails to the customer service team, i am now dealing with at least 3 people with reference numbers WRT135(#10846504) & (#10823140)‏.

 

not only am i being messed about with this, the people replying to my emails have not always been polite and in at least one instance they cant even spell.

 

To Vodafone's credit they did offer to change the plan by 3 months which i have refused on principle, with no contract in place, why should i accept a 3 month extension when all i wanted was to upgrade my plan which i honestly believe to be 18 months.

 

I have recorded (paperwork) history of them doing this when i first took out my original plan which within 2 days had been extended by a year from 18 months to 30 months (ouuuuch), that was back in 2009 because i had a gateway box for the house as they said we have a great signal and had zero signal and roll on 2013 its de ja vue.

I even had a call from the retention team asking me what phone i upgraded back in 2011 as the system didn't show one, he also advised sticking to my guns as they cant prove anything and to escalate my complaints as high as possible (an impossibility when the customer services teams don't tell you who they are or their position) a severe lack of paperwork or documents i think.

 

I am now at the point of hitting my head against a brick wall, do i simply send a complaint to ofcom, let them take the £127 ETF they want and then claim it back in the small claims court (protecting my credit reference) or do i cancel the direct debit and see what happens but still write to ofcom?

Footnote: Lee, if you read this, you can see that your guys have already seen a copy of my emails and have failed to resolve this issue. reference numbers above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dans forum post gave me a link to this,

having read the unfair terms in consumer contracts i think you should consider

The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 section 5 sub para (4) It shall be for any seller or supplier who claims that a term was individually negotiated to show that it was.

 

also under schedule 2 Regulation 5(5)

SCHEDULE 2 INDICATIVE AND NON-EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF TERMS WHICH MAY BE REGARDED AS UNFAIR

 

(l)providing for the price of goods to be determined at the time of delivery or allowing a seller of goods or supplier of services to increase their price without in both cases giving the consumer the corresponding right to cancel the contract if the final price is too high in relation to the price agreed when the contract was concluded; (does this apply to price increase?)

 

(o)obliging the consumer to fulfil all his obligations where the seller or supplier does not perform his; (copy of contract, no signal etc)

 

(q)excluding or hindering the consumer’s right to take legal action or exercise any other legal remedy, particularly by requiring the consumer to take disputes exclusively to arbitration not covered by legal provisions, unduly restricting the evidence available to him or imposing on him a burden of proof which, according to the applicable law, should lie with another party to the contract. - (not down to me to proof the contract but vodafone?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow the advice in this thread HERE

Get Lee the resident vodafone rep in on this

 

Although he may pop in and find you via the reference numbers you have posted.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dans forum post gave me a link to this,

having read the unfair terms in consumer contracts i think you should consider

The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 section 5 sub para (4) It shall be for any seller or supplier who claims that a term was individually negotiated to show that it was.

 

also under schedule 2 Regulation 5(5)

SCHEDULE 2 INDICATIVE AND NON-EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF TERMS WHICH MAY BE REGARDED AS UNFAIR

 

(l)providing for the price of goods to be determined at the time of delivery or allowing a seller of goods or supplier of services to increase their price without in both cases giving the consumer the corresponding right to cancel the contract if the final price is too high in relation to the price agreed when the contract was concluded; (does this apply to price increase?)

 

(o)obliging the consumer to fulfil all his obligations where the seller or supplier does not perform his; (copy of contract, no signal etc)

 

(q)excluding or hindering the consumer’s right to take legal action or exercise any other legal remedy, particularly by requiring the consumer to take disputes exclusively to arbitration not covered by legal provisions, unduly restricting the evidence available to him or imposing on him a burden of proof which, according to the applicable law, should lie with another party to the contract. - (not down to me to proof the contract but vodafone?)

 

Looks good to me.

 

Did Vodaphone offer to cancel the contract when you discovered that there was no signal, or was their only offer the box & extra year?

 

Vodaphone should know what was in the welcome letter (although it might be difficult for them to work that out). Obviously the length of a contract is as important as the price and should be made very clear before the contract is entered into as well as the contract document that they sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...