Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell and orange 'debt', defaults put back after orange removed them!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4127 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone. I hope someone can give me some advice.

 

I had an Orange contract phone I ended up not paying as I was admitted to hospital with a very serious illness.

 

it took me a year to recover and recently I looked at my credit file as I knew it was shot to pieces from all the payments I missed with everything.

 

Orange had defaulted me.

I contacted them and explained the situation and told them I am willing to pay as I know I owe the money.

They removed the default straight away and then passed the account Lowell for collection in November 2012.

 

I contacted Lowell straight away by email telling them I would pay the money in installments and I expect that no derogatory information would be placed on my credit file.

 

i began paying the installments as arranged. I have not missed a payment.

 

I looked at my credit file yesterday and have discovered that Lowell have placed another default on my credit file for this account.

 

I want to ask if they are allowed to do this.

1) - place a default when Orange removed the 1st one.

2) - place a default if I have been paying them and not missed any payments

 

Also I have noticed there are two different dates of the default on experian and equifax.

 

Experian shows it as being defaulted from Dec 2012 and Equifax shows it as being defaulted (from Lowell) from early 2011

- the date Orange originally defaulted me.

 

But equifax didnt even hold the account then... it was still owned by Orange until Nov 2012.

Thanks to anyone that can help.

 

Also - should I carry on paying the installments? If I have already been defaulted what more will lowell do?

Edited by minmac
Another Question
Link to post
Share on other sites

STOP talking to them (lowlifes) on the phone.

 

STOP these payments, and I bet you were conned into setting up a direct debit too? Cancel it and instruct the bank that under NO circumstances are Lowlifes OR Orange to be allowed access to your account without your express permission.

 

Start Orange' complaints procedure, and STOP discussing this over the phone, you must keep everything in writing and keep a diary of events.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone. I hope someone can give me some advice.

 

I had an Orange contract phone I ended up not paying as I was admitted to hospital with a very serious illness.

 

it took me a year to recover and recently I looked at my credit file as I knew it was shot to pieces from all the payments I missed with everything.

 

Orange had defaulted me.

I contacted them and explained the situation and told them I am willing to pay as I know I owe the money.

They removed the default straight away and then passed the account Lowell for collection in November 2012.

 

I contacted Lowell straight away by email telling them I would pay the money in installments and I expect that no derogatory information would be placed on my credit file.

 

i began paying the installments as arranged. I have not missed a payment.

 

I looked at my credit file yesterday and have discovered that Lowell have placed another default on my credit file for this account.

 

I want to ask if they are allowed to do this.

1) - place a default when Orange removed the 1st one.

2) - place a default if I have been paying them and not missed any payments

 

Also I have noticed there are two different dates of the default on experian and equifax.

 

Experian shows it as being defaulted from Dec 2012 and Equifax shows it as being defaulted (from Lowell) from early 2011

- the date Orange originally defaulted me.

 

But equifax didnt even hold the account then... it was still owned by Orange until Nov 2012.

Thanks to anyone that can help.

 

Also - should I carry on paying the installments? If I have already been defaulted what more will lowell do?

 

Write to Lowells compliance manager with any confirmation you had from Orange about the default being removed. If Orange removed it as a discretionary act, I would hope that Lowells would also agree this, but they may not. As it was discretionary on Oranges part, I am not sure that Lowells are required to remove their default. Technically the Orange phone account they have taken over, is in default. You are paying back the money by instalments, against this default.

 

Lowells should correct the default date, if they don't agree to remove it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

and unless lowlife own the debt

 

pay orange directly

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You for replying guys. I am emailing Lowell now regarding this.

Also one more thing... did they have to inform me that they had placed this default? I only found out as I was looking at my credit report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right you need to write to the DATA CONTROLLER at Lowell copy in a seperate envelope to Sarah de Tute the Legal and Compliance Director, as follows.

 

Ref: use Lowells

 

Sir/Madam,

 

Formal Complaint.

 

I have recently checked my credit reference foles and have found that Lowell are now reporting on an Orange account

a copy of the entry is attached, I had been in contact with Orange regarding the conduct and payment of this account and Orange agreed to remove all default entries from credit files, and subsequently this was done.

 

Lowell having aquired this accountare now reporting the account as defaulted I believe the is manifestly unfair having agreed with the creditor that a default should be removed, any agreement between my self and Orange including repayments should be honoured.

 

I now require Lowell to remove all references to this matter from all credit reference files, a copy of this letter is being forwarded to the OFT and the ICO immediately.

 

send the Data Controller letter recorded the other one normal post.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...