Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Obesity: Fat People Could Face Benefit Cuts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not sure that it matters about the individual diets of people on this forum or whether it's better that we cook from scratch or not. The point is that if I should be made redundant and need to call on the National Insurance system I have paid into for years does it give those running the system, whose wages are paid by those who have paid in, the right to tell me what I eat? I don't think so. One party wishes to nanny us and the other is paternalistic; neither of these should be the case - it is an insurance scheme. The problem is that they have avoided making this obvious because they like to use it as a political tool. £200 annual winter fuel allowence for pensioners - I ask you. How on earth much does it cost to administer that and the only reason it wasn't just added to the pension for us to decide how to manage our own income was because the party in power wanted to make a gesture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not sure that it matters about the individual diets of people on this forum or whether it's better that we cook from scratch or not. The point is that if I should be made redundant and need to call on the National Insurance system I have paid into for years does it give those running the system' date=' whose wages are paid by those who have paid in, the right to tell me what I eat? I don't think so. One party wishes to nanny us and the other is paternalistic; neither of these should be the case - it is an insurance scheme. The problem is that they have avoided making this obvious because they like to use it as a political tool. £200 annual winter fuel allowence for pensioners - I ask you. How on earth much does it cost to administer that and the only reason it wasn't just added to the pension for us to decide how to manage our own income was because the party in power wanted to make a gesture.[/quote']

 

Hello there.

 

To pick out one part of your post, although I do sympathise with what you say, NI has never been an insurance scheme. For as long as I remember, this year's contributions have paid this year's claims/pensions, etc. It's just been another form of tax.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed the only way to lose fat is for energy in to be less than energy out. Of course going to the gym can help that but at the other end it can increase weight as muscle is denser than fat.

 

As for the logic of having a car on DLA if you think about it there is no sense. The car will be made by a foreign owned company so the profit made will be paid to a foreign company etc. If you follow the logic we can create wealth by making everyone unemployed or sick.

I truly hope no one believes that

 

Not all DLA cars are foreign, I think you'll find the majority are British built. Even so there is a massive industry involved in servicing the cars selling them etc. An industry that will be very badly damaged by PIP and the lose of 1000s of Motability customers.

 

Taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich is not the way to boost the economy, it does the opposite. The rich do not spend their extra money they already have more than enough Super cars/yachts. The only way to boost the economy is to give money to the poor they spend most of their money. Just what is needed for the country.

 

Also the poor are obese because cheap food is unhealthy (it needn't be but it is). We are a couple on pension credits and eat healthy food; a weeks food costs us more than a couple on working age benefits get to cover everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

To pick out one part of your post, although I do sympathise with what you say, NI has never been an insurance scheme. For as long as I remember, this year's contributions have paid this year's claims/pensions, etc. It's just been another form of tax.

 

HB

 

That may be true but it was sold to the british people as a social security system (well at least it did up untill the 1980s/Thatcher). One which we all paid into happily because we knew if we where sick or unable to work we would be looked after. If we wanted a low tax system, where we looked after our own health and welfare we would have moved to the US.

Edited by count orlok
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't take statins as they have an adverse effect on me. I think they clash with the methotrexate and make me fell very woozy. I guess it may cheaper than drinking the beer to get the same feeling! :wink:

Recently I have started drinking a tot of whisky on its own on occasion, but never when we are out and about socialising which is about once a week at the local as I prefer a lager.

 

Statins are useless for most people and have more side effects than benefits.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

That may be true but it was sold to the british people as a social security system (well at least it did up untill the 1980s). One which we all paid into happily because we knew if we where sick or unable to work we would be looked after. If we wanted a low tax system, where we looked after our own health and welfare we would have moved to the US.

 

Hi, I know what you mean, it's an unfortunate name with hindsight. I paid in for years too, I'm not saying it isn't disappointing.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is aimed more at those who claim IB / ESA for obesity and obesity related illnesses rather than those who lose their job, claim JSA and are capable of working.

 

ah, but obesity IS an illness, so there are plenty of other illnesses that could have behavioural caveats to benefit payments, but the other illnesses are not being targeted.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope not, I'm on 80mg a day!

 

There are some people they seem to help - those with familial hypercholesterolemia, and men who have already had heart attacks, though the latter group may be helped more by the anti inflammatory effects of the statins rather than from any cholesterol lowering effect.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obesity is not always an illness although sometimes it is granted.

Can i ask what your scientific and /or medical qualifications are as you do seem very prone to sweeping statements. If statins. are of no use why does the nhs spend so much valuable money on them,why is my foreign brother in law prescribed statins from his home country doctor because of a genetic cholesterol problem.

 

Count Orlock, maybe the cars are British built but by foreign owned companies. Are there any economic studies that show the cost if motorbility payments brings more or less money in.

 

I appreciate everyone has a particular viewpoint but we need to have open minds, present me with the evidence and i will question it and make a decision on varying my stance.

 

There are as many varieties of diets as days in the year. Maybe the diet of porridge sandwich and cooked meal was a little heavy on carbs, personally i don't think so. I suspect the porridge is made with protein rich milk. If the poster has been on it for six months, to suggest that they will have list no fat is odd. Is it all water then? They would be ill by now.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read the evidence about cholesterol and statins. Alas it is either bad or incomplete science. There is no distinguishing between types of cholesterol. where it says people with heart disease have lower cholesterol is that on diagnosis or after treatment?

I do agree there are side effects and i also agree that a lot can be done with diet,but as previously discussed that isn't a quick or easy fix.

 

My biggest shock today however was finding that i had to agree with the devil of Rome who says that capitalism is a bad thing.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read the evidence about cholesterol and statins. Alas it is either bad or incomplete science. There is no distinguishing between types of cholesterol. where it says people with heart disease have lower cholesterol is that on diagnosis or after treatment?

I do agree there are side effects and i also agree that a lot can be done with diet,but as previously discussed that isn't a quick or easy fix.

 

 

I don't have a medical degree, but I do have a science based degree. I enjoy keeping up to date in areas of health, nutrition, weight, and particularly where these intersect. I also have become particularly interested in areas of bad science, and sadly nutrition and pharmaceuticals are particularly bad - generally because a lot of the research is sponsored, carried out by or endorsed by people with a vested interest. Any statements I make on these areas are from my own reading of the research, and of those who have analysed the research, I'm happy to suggest some reading to any who are interested. I was amazed when I started reading and found out how much we consider to be 'common sense' or common knowledge in these areas is actually based on poor research showing correlations rather than proving causation. The whole demonisation of fat rather than sugar started with a guy called Ancel Keys, who did a correlation between heart disease and fat intake in seven countries - turns out he had info on 22 countries (if I remember rightly) but just picked countries that fit his hypothesis. Turns out there was a much stronger correlation between sugar and heart disease and highly processed fats and heart disease (think highly processed vegetable oil and margerine, trans fats etc).

 

I remember when I first started reading the first book I got on the issue, starting to read around on the internet in shock, looking at the actual research and then waving the book at my husband ranting about we were all being lied to and given all the wrong advice. Sadly, nowadays, money talks louder than truth, or peoples' health and lives.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I followed the slimming world diet and managed to lose 2 and a half stone and have kept most off! Will be restarting next week a I have more to lose.

My Doc has encoraged me to walk, even if its just 10 mins a day, you get a change of scenery, fresh air(as long as its not next to a busy road) Vit D if its sunny and it helps lift your mood and weight control,was doing that till my latest op now I am back to hobbling for 5 to 10 mins instead of my 30 mins a day, I miss going out but its far to painful :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some people they seem to help - those with familial hypercholesterolemia, and men who have already had heart attacks, though the latter group may be helped more by the anti inflammatory effects of the statins rather than from any cholesterol lowering effect.

 

Thats good. I seem to fit the group they help perfectly. I eat very healthy home cooked food, but due to lack of exersize because of several heart attacks and other problems I am a few stone over weight. I'd have to take the cut in benefits though rather than risk a gym.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Estellyn. having a scientific background you will understand my concerns about incomplete science just as any sort of spin worries me. Lies dam lies and statistics. The evidence you quoted did not provide a full and reasoned argument that would hold any water as a stand alone hypothesis.

This is one of the dangers of the internet, it gives credibility to unfounded and unproven theories and they can get away with it because no one questions .

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any one remember that program on obese people where they had to cut away the roof of a house to lift the person off the bed with a crane to take them to a hospital. It was aired a few months ago. The person had no disorders, but just ate too much of the wrong food. I think that those people need to be targeted and helped, not penalised.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can hardly call it a healthy diet. For starters it's too rich in carbohydrates (ok for the prorridge though), not enough protein and you need some healthy fats, like Omega 3 from fish. Then what about the fizzy drinks?

You might have lost weight but I am pretty sure you haven't lost much body fat.

EDIT: I missed the meat for dinner. Still not an ideal diet.

Why? The only fizzy drink besides the odd beer that I have is Coke zero now and then or when out a diet whatever drink. Eat a lot of chicken and have fish once for twice a week. Fish is plain and not battered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst Coke Zero may have no calories, it's full of sugar.

 

It states on the can that it is sugar free and has a content of less than 1 calorie. I thought it was caffeine free, but apparently not. I was buying it because I thought it was caffeine free! Thanks for spoiling one of my few pleasures. :-D

I now have to start searching all over again for a fizzy soft drink that does not contain caffeine or sugar! My wife is not supposed to drink anything with caffeine in it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweeteners but no caffeine is what I would be looking for.

 

You used to be able to get caffeine-free Diet Coke, but I haven't seen it anywhere in ages. It was sold in gold coloured cans. IMHO it was pretty terrible anyhow. How about something like Diet Sprite, Diet 7-Up or Diet Fanta?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Estellyn. having a scientific background you will understand my concerns about incomplete science just as any sort of spin worries me. Lies dam lies and statistics. The evidence you quoted did not provide a full and reasoned argument that would hold any water as a stand alone hypothesis.

This is one of the dangers of the internet, it gives credibility to unfounded and unproven theories and they can get away with it because no one questions .

 

What do you want proof of, I'll dig out some links to the actual research, which is what I look at to check out anyone on the internet I read - I check their sources and see if the theory holds water to me. But everyone needs to make their own decisions - I just wish more people practised critical thinking skills, rather than absorb media stories, which are the worst.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...