Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

e-petition for Cameron & Osbourne to resign and call a election


osdset
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4102 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry Philip Bateman this is just political rubbish. The blame continually being attributed to the Labour Party is perfectly justified as they are the party that got us into this mess. Their continual 'No more Boom or Bust' has proved to be the stupidest statement any party has ever made and in fact Gordon Brown has led us into the biggest and deepest Bust this country has ever known.

 

If you think a silly petition can lead to a general election you are very misguided. If it was that simple the opposition would have done it long ago.

 

You are also not looking at the amount of Labours debt that has been paid back already. Making contracts that is more expensive to cancel than continue with, commissioning the building of two aircraft carriers bigger than even the US has is more than stupidity, it is criminal. We haven't any aircraft to stock them with nor the sailors to crew them with. They are to be finished, because there is no way out of the contract, and then put into mothball.

 

This is the mess that has to be sorted. And while I don't agree with a coalition, (we would always have had these if the looney Libdems had their way with proportional representation), at least this government is making an effort to pay back the debt Labour made and to get the country on to a footing that should prevent it happening again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And If you still believe this whole thing It's just about debt then I have this bridge I'd like to sell you....

 

The blame continually being attributed to the Labour Party is perfectly justified as they are the party that got us into this mess.

 

Aww, and there's me thinking the banks had a hand in all this.

 

at least this government is making an effort to pay back the debt Labour made and to get the country on to a footing that should prevent it happening again.

 

Hah, hahahahahahahahahhahahhahahahhahahhahhahhahah! *Oh my aching sides* Well at least one person is still believing their propaganda.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well are you going to respond or are you just mouth and trousers.

 

Well just answer me this, do you think It's seen to be good form that a Mod on here is appearing to try and pick fights with it's members?

Edited by sadone
Link to post
Share on other sites

So all you can do is answer a question with another question, I thought so.

 

I see no mod trying to pick a fight with anyone. I see that Conniff has questiond a stupid epetition that will get nowhere and the setter of the petition knows that.

I also see that someone, in typical tree hugger fashion, has said I am wrong, but hasn't given any reason why or said what is right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also see that someone, in typical tree hugger fashion, has said I am wrong, but hasn't given any reason why or said what is right.

 

As I said before you do seem to have a way with words don't you? :D And judging by some of your past posts on here you also appear to be rather right wing, which imo seems an odd fit with this place. But hey, maybe thats just me. :)

 

I'm not a politician, so off the top of my head can't come up with a solution, but then I'm sure neither can can you.

 

One thing I do know is that this government has proved time and time again is unfairly targeting the poorest, sickest section of society and yet choosing to booster the coffers of large corporate and millionaires.

 

They been proven to lie, cheat and use the dirtiest tactics to get what they want and many are now realsing that it's gone well beyond dealing with any deficit but instead has rapidly moved into the realms of some kind of social restructuring.

 

You happy with that, then fine, but many aren't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not left, right, up or down. I don't care about politicians or the things they say, but I can see when one party is only interested in spending money we haven't got and another is trying to correct that.

Maybe they are attempting social restructuring, the country probably needs it. If you take child allowance, it was only an interim measure brought in after WW2 to supplement women whose husbands never came back from the war. That was almost 60 years ago and there should be no reason for it's existence today. There are a million things having money spent on that are not the responsibility of government and they shouldn't be called on to pay for these things when ultimately it is you and me who pay for it as the government doesn't have any commercial income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not left, right, up or down. I don't care about politicians or the things they say, but I can see when one party is only interested in spending money we haven't got and another is trying to correct that.

Maybe they are attempting social restructuring, the country probably needs it. If you take child allowance, it was only an interim measure brought in after WW2 to supplement women whose husbands never came back from the war. That was almost 60 years ago and there should be no reason for it's existence today. There are a million things having money spent on that are not the responsibility of government and they shouldn't be called on to pay for these things when ultimately it is you and me who pay for it as the government doesn't have any commercial income.

 

If wages were high enough, there wouldn't need to be any benefits for anyone working. The problem with government intervention is too often it is in the wrong places - mandating a living wage would be a better intervention, but until then, what do you suggest? Benefits cannot just be withdrawn, if people cannot afford to live on a full time wage alone.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I for one think they are doing an good job with the mess they have been left and will be voting Tory next time round.

 

Don't make me laugh, the Tory party is finished, IDS is busy hammering the final nails in the Conservative coffin, his latest outburst on tax credits was obviously spat out before he realised the ramifications for his business buddies, scrap WTC and the only incentive for taking NMW, zero hour contract employment is gone, the employers will either have to pay a living wage, or rely even more on free labour from workfare, and that 'nice little earner' is on the skids.

 

The only thing this government will succeed in bringing about this year is civil unrest.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't make me laugh, the Tory party is finished,

 

Oh I wouldn't write them off just yet. Imo their propaganda campaign has seemed to have worked on enough people who apparantly don't seem to read too much into whats really going on behind the scenes, and that combined with labour being far too quiet on too many issues doesn't exactly make them appear to be a serious threat to them and their 'followers'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I wouldn't write them off just yet. Imo their propaganda campaign has seemed to have worked on enough people who apparantly don't seem to read too much into whats really going on behind the scenes, and that combined with labour being far too quiet on too many issues doesn't exactly make them appear to be a serious threat to them and their 'followers'.

 

I don't expect Labour, or UKIP to topple the Tories, they are more than capable off doing the job themselves.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at the full situation, it is not wages being too low, on the contrary, they are too high and this country is pricing itself out of the world markets. Our industry could not compete so has all shut down. This country is practically living on service industries which does not earn the country any money or pay wages.

 

It's not 'if wages were high enough', it's 'if people lived within their means'. Wages up, costs up and the circle just goes around and around. You can see that with the railways, huge rises which now makes them the most expensive railways in the world, but no huge extra profit because they have to pay high wages.

 

I'm not saying the ordinary person shouldn't have nice things, but I am saying the population seems to have a misconception of 'I'm entitled' when they are not entitled to anything.

 

a petition would be better served if it called for the abolition of payday loan companies with the 1,000s of % interest and the bill of sale (logbook loans) style of lending, and most of all, a big clamp down on banks and their gross bonuses.

 

I don't expect the Tories to get back into power mainly because of a voting public that is blind to the 'real' things that matter. There is no such party as LibDem, they were always a joke, this is still a two party country and it will take an eternity to break that. The problem we have is Labour will get in at the next election spend/borrow/spend more/borrow more and on and on until the next election when the tories will get in again and have to clean it all up again, that is how it has always been.

 

One thing is certain, Labour may shout about some of the measures being taken today, but they won't reverse a single one when they get into power.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't expect Labour, or UKIP to topple the Tories, they are more than capable off doing the job themselves

 

Oh I dunno. Imo there are too many greedy misinformed idiots going around at the moment, and the one thing the tories did get 'right' is their spin campaign. Right from the off they very quickly managed to change peoples attitudes to not only the disabled, sick and unemployed but to the idea of welfare itself. Imo paving the way for their draconian 'reforms'.

 

The fact we all pay taxes so that later in life we're meant to be looked after/helped no-longer seems to matter anymore, which to me is the really worrying issue here.

 

I'm not saying the ordinary person shouldn't have nice things, but I am saying the population seems to have a misconception of 'I'm entitled' when they are not entitled to anything.

 

And see above. Jesus...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact we all pay taxes so that later in life we're meant to be looked after/helped no-longer seems to matter anymore, which to me is the really worrying issue here.

 

Of course it's worrying, but this is where changes have to be made. The NI was based on people living up to 70 with only the odd one or two going past that, but now with the majority of people living well into their 80's, there just isn't enough funds to pay for all that is associated with being older.

 

Not only are they drawing pensions for 20 years more, they are also consuming medicine by the bucket load and making huge demands on the NHS, in general.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not 'if wages were high enough', it's 'if people lived within their means'. Wages up, costs up and the circle just goes around and around. You can see that with the railways, huge rises which now makes them the most expensive railways in the world, but no huge extra profit because they have to pay high wages.

Try working for NMW in London and living within your means, £247.60 gross for a 40 hour week would not even cover rent and council tax in most boroughs after deductions, and what is wrong with earnings being commensurate with skill and experience? Using your logic, a doctor should therefore be on the same salary as a shop assistant, pay peanuts get monkeys.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to that, all I can say is Look at China, they are taking over the world because they have low wages and can make everything cheaper than the rest of the world, even India can't compete with them which is why all the manufacturing is done there. Why do you think dyson closed his UK operation and factory and moved to China, he couldn't make enough profit using the UK.

 

We people have our destiny in our own hands, if someone is willing to pay £thousands per week for a 2 room flat in London, then bigger fool them, but they shouldn't expect the government to subsidise this gross abuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at the full situation, it is not wages being too low, on the contrary, they are too high and this country is pricing itself out of the world markets. Our industry could not compete so has all shut down. This country is practically living on service industries which does not earn the country any money or pay wages.

 

It's not 'if wages were high enough', it's 'if people lived within their means'. Wages up, costs up and the circle just goes around and around. You can see that with the railways, huge rises which now makes them the most expensive railways in the world, but no huge extra profit because they have to pay high wages.

 

I'm not saying the ordinary person shouldn't have nice things, but I am saying the population seems to have a misconception of 'I'm entitled' when they are not entitled to anything.

 

a petition would be better served if it called for the abolition of payday loan companies with the 1,000s of % interest and the bill of sale (logbook loans) style of lending, and most of all, a big clamp down on banks and their gross bonuses.

 

I don't expect the Tories to get back into power mainly because of a voting public that is blind to the 'real' things that matter. There is no such party as LibDem, they were always a joke, this is still a two party country and it will take an eternity to break that. The problem we have is Labour will get in at the next election spend/borrow/spend more/borrow more and on and on until the next election when the tories will get in again and have to clean it all up again, that is how it has always been.

 

One thing is certain, Labour may shout about some of the measures being taken today, but they won't reverse a single one when they get into power.

 

What about the people struggling to pay for just essentials - and there are plenty. I'm fed up with this misapprehension that the less well off are that way because they've brought it on themselves, by feeling entitled to things and buying things they can't afford, and racking up debts. Basic essentials are so costly now, that those on very low wages struggle with the basics, even with help from in work benefits. I'm happy for wages to be lower if the cost of living is also lower - what's your solution to that?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to that, all I can say is Look at China, they are taking over the world because they have low wages and can make everything cheaper than the rest of the world, even India can't compete with them which is why all the manufacturing is done there. Why do you think dyson closed his UK operation and factory and moved to China, he couldn't make enough profit using the UK.

 

We people have our destiny in our own hands, if someone is willing to pay £thousands per week for a 2 room flat in London, then bigger fool them, but they shouldn't expect the government to subsidise this gross abuse.

 

The cost of living in china is very low compared with here. And cost of living rises here are really due to corporate and individual greed and profit chasing. That can be traced back to the 80's and the privatisation of essential services, and selling off of social housing stock.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to that, all I can say is Look at China, they are taking over the world because they have low wages and can make everything cheaper than the rest of the world, even India can't compete with them which is why all the manufacturing is done there. Why do you think dyson closed his UK operation and factory and moved to China, he couldn't make enough profit using the UK.

 

We people have our destiny in our own hands, if someone is willing to pay £thousands per week for a 2 room flat in London, then bigger fool them, but they shouldn't expect the government to subsidise this gross abuse.

 

Hey some countries I'm sure keep manufacturing costs down by using slave labour, or employing young children, but does that mean we should do the same?

 

Maybe we could turn a quick profit by showing kids back up chimneys :D

 

We people have our destiny in our own hands, if someone is willing to pay £thousands per week for a 2 room flat in London, then bigger fool them, but they shouldn't expect the government to subsidise this gross abuse.

 

Well how about they reform the whole private letting system. Regulate tenancies and vet private landlords like they're going to do in Scotland? Make it so local councils aren't asked to pay ridiculous prices for poor standard accommodation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I live on basic essentials, so I know full well how costly it is to live.

 

One way out is to stop dead the bull**** and greed of councils. Look at the amount of empty shops there are in every town and city, they aren't all empty because there are no customers, they are empty because councils charge too much in rent and business rates so the goods are too expensive. Councils would rather the shops were left empty than advertise, 'no business rates for 2 years if you move to our area'. They have a 'can only be used for xx' policy that brings in no money.

 

There was a huge Coop furniture warehouse quite near here that shut up shop. Application was made to move into it my Go-kart, bowling alley and countless other companies, but the council said no it is for furniture and it was empty for 20 years making no money but costing on security and inspections.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...