Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

barclaycard debt sold to Lowell - chasing BC debt


Hacked_Off
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3610 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Without seeing your SAR it is difficult to comment. Most of these large banks are split into various entities with separate DPA registration. Unless you noted all the accounts you wanted the SAR to be done on, they may have not realised.

 

You could check with the ICO.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 367
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Fos havnt upheld my complaint about the charges

The FOS the ICO the OFT the CSA and West Yorkshire Trading Standards all sided with Lowell. Fortunately we still have impartiality in the courts who can't be influenced by politics and money. I had to rely on them to confirm Lowell had failed to prove their ownership of my account. There is no regulation and anyone who tries for Freedom of Information against Lowell find get the Standard fob off. In my opinion all the above are a disgrace to regulation. Anyone share my opinion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical - I'm not sure any of the regulators have any regulatory power whatever - complete waste of space. Remember the OFT bank charges catch-up that actually caused more problems for those reclaiming bank charges? I think the finane industry(ies) and the regulators are far too cosy.

 

Interesting today that it's the Competition Commission not any of the finance regulators who will be looking at payday loan companies -- this body if I've got the name right from memory, actually has some teeth.

 

I saw some bod talking about how the major banks lend the money to the payday loan companies to lend out at 5000% APR. He suggested some of this money was under the government's initiative to lend cheap money to the banks to stimulate the economy. You couldn't make it up.

 

Keep your chin up hackedoff!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No PENALTY charges is 'fair'

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I can help on the default side for you and will alert someone to help on reclaiming charges which is not an area I am too familiar with.

 

The regulation you require is the Information Commissioner Office Technical Guidance on defaults, this states that 'If a default sum consists of charges without which the account would not have been defaulted NO DEFAULT SHOULD BE PLACED.'

 

You need to make a formal complaint to the creditor concerned, addressed to the Data Controller, provide 'proof' that the default sum is all charges for a quicker (hopefully) response.

Alert sent for your reclaim.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so Lowell have closed their file on this Barclaycard account.

 

I see that you have had a crack at getting the charges back and have been refused. It was passed to fos and they did ot uphold your complaint. This should be no surprise at all because fos really are not interested in charges claims and generally side with the lenders on these issues. They take the OFT statement on charges as a basis on which they base their decisions hence they usually come down on the side of the banks.

 

So you need now to press this with Barclaycard and sue if necessary.

 

When you put in your claim to Barclaycard for the charges, did you enclose a spreadsheet of claim which showed the charges you wanted back and the associated interest?

 

It appears that you have not sent any "Letter Before Action" to Barclaycard....is that correct? If so that would be the next step after completing a spreadsheet.

 

If you can answer this post then we can get you back on track with this.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just having a read back through the thread so we can get you the right letters/PoC etc.

 

Back in a mo......

 

Thank you for looking in ims!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to make a formal complaint to the creditor concerned, addressed to the Data Controller, provide 'proof' that the default sum is all charges for a quicker (hopefully) response.

Alert sent for your reclaim.

 

Already done that, Barclays insist it is correct and won't be removed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so Lowell have closed their file on this Barclaycard account.

 

I see that you have had a crack at getting the charges back and have been refused. It was passed to fos and they did ot uphold your complaint. This should be no surprise at all because fos really are not interested in charges claims and generally side with the lenders on these issues. They take the OFT statement on charges as a basis on which they base their decisions hence they usually come down on the side of the banks.

 

So you need now to press this with Barclaycard and sue if necessary.

 

When you put in your claim to Barclaycard for the charges, did you enclose a spreadsheet of claim which showed the charges you wanted back and the associated interest?

 

It appears that you have not sent any "Letter Before Action" to Barclaycard....is that correct? If so that would be the next step after completing a spreadsheet.

 

If you can answer this post then we can get you back on track with this.

 

Yes spreadsheet sent. Letter before action was sent last week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK you are diddling yourself. That is an 8% simple interest calculator. Barclaycard have historically paid out for compound interest in restitution at a nominal rate of 24.9%.

 

In fact there is a thread where a member has this morning received an offer on this basis.

 

There is still time to pull this back to your advantage.

 

Complete this spreadsheet using an interest rate of 24.9% and with the "claim to" date set to today. You will be surprised at the figure it comes up with.

 

CISheet v101.xls

 

Can you also post up the text of the LBA you sent them please?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok good.

 

Now the next thing is to look at the default situation.

 

Save a copy of the spreadsheet you have just done.

 

Without me reading the whole thread again, have al look at the default date of the account. Change the "claim to" date to the date the account was defaulted and remove any charges from the sheet which have a date later than the default date. (there may not be any).

 

If the spreadsheet now shows a figure greater than that of the default amount then it is all charges and it gives you the ammunition to have the default removed.

 

That being the case, your next approach to Barclaycard will not only be for an increased amount of claim but also the removal of the default.

 

If you can get back to us with this info then we can do the necessary final letter to them before starting legal action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I would suggest another (this time final) Letter Before Action. Make sure you keep copies of all of this stuff since you may well need it for your court bundle if it gets that far.

 

I would suggest the following as your LBA which you should send to the Barclaycard Registered Office. I would send this recorded signed for in order that you know when they get it.

 

 

Account number................... ................ date etc

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

I have recently been made aware of media reports and an investigation into credit card charges by the Office of Fair Trading.

 

I now understand that the regime of fees which you have applied to my account in relation to late fees and over limit charges are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and Consumer regulations in that they did not/do not represent a genuine pre-estimate of your actual costs.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that this account was opened. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law and in consideration of fair business practices and good faith.

 

It is my contention that you have failed to operate my account in a manner conducive to the above and have demonstrated a lack of fiduciary duty.

 

I calculate that you have taken £(enter the amount of charges) plus £(enter the amount of compound interest) which you have charged me in interest which total £(enter the total of the previous two items). Additionally, you have entered a default notice against my credit record. This default occurred merely in respect of unlawful charges levied by you, or was the result of impecuniosity caused directly by the taking by you of penalty charges which you had applied to my account.

 

In recent years Courts have been happy to accept claims for unlawful charges that exceed 6 years whilst having regards to the precedent set between KLEINWORT BENSON -v- LINCOLN CITY COUNCIL under section 32(1) © of the Limitation Act 1980.

 

Should County Court action be needed I will be seeking to rely on this.

 

Therefore this letter requests a refund of all charges indicated including interest 14 days from the date of this letter together with removal of all adverse markers on my credit files.

 

I request that payment is made directly to me, by cheque, and that any refund in whole or part should not be allocated to any set off or third parties.

 

Should such a set off occur, my claim will be deemed as unsettled and I will proceed to the Courts for recovery.

 

You now have 14 days to respond positively failing which I shall issue County Court proceedings without further recourse to yourselves.

 

 

Yours Faithfully

 

Enc; Schedule of charges

 

 

Remember to attach a print of your spreadsheet (the one with the claim date set to today).

 

If you do not receive the required response (or of they fail to respond at all) then when the 14 days are up you issue the court papers.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...