Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Different statements. One has “at 59 mph overtaking on the approach” and the other “it was overtaking on the approach and in ....... at 49 mph”. So not the same statement (same ethos, different sentence structure).   perhaps they chose that site for the officer because it is an accident hotspot, and they know people do dodgy overtakes (while speeding) there .....??  
    • Hi.   I've moved your thread to the Bailiffs forum. People should be along to advise later.   HB
    • So a little update;   Of the 6 letters I sent 3 were acknowledged. One accepting £1/month for now and two from the same creditor trading under different names asking for full I&E which I haven't done.   In a moment of madness I managed to depsoit 5k to a gambling site I didn't have due to paypal's crazy policy of allowing payments which are to be collected by direct debit after a couple of days to gambling sites! Mad they allow this but this will show as a negative paypal balance (in a different account to the original "debt"). The first paypal -£5k account has been closed and passed to a DCA now. I have ignored them.   My council has appeared to have stepped up their collection efforts for £2.5k in alleged housing benefit overpayment from 2015/16. I have acknowledged their letters over the past 3 years each time by email but they rarely respond to my pleas. I truly think if there was overpayment then it was for less than half the amount they claim. At the time I didn't think I was being overpaid because I wasn't really working but I had stopped claiming JSA/ESA (and told them as much) but earned a couple of hundred pounds a month from sporadic work.   Also what I thought was a dormant debt from 2016 to Halifax has been actually sold ( to caboot? I think. Hard to keep track of everyone)   I've been getting phone calls daily but ignoring them for the most part. I did request all communication in writing in my original letters.   I feel incapable of dealing with these creditors and whilst initially I was feeling that I would be happy to just ignore all the letters (arreas, defaults and the like) and phone calls for an indefinite amount of time and  hope to make it 6 years to statute barred-ness and accept or defend any CCJ attempts that did arrive. I figured that avoiding these creditors for 3 months so far is 5% of the way there to statute barred! But I figre for these fairly sizeable amounts they probably won't all let it go and I will get some CCJ docs (never had to deal with that) However now my mood and thinking has changed.    I am looking again at insolvency. I'm over the DRO limit now so its BR or nothing. I was wondering why you said to not consider this and it would be stupid @dx100uk? Although shirking my debts/responsibilities it does seem like an "easy" way out at the moment. It would be so nice to know that what's done is done and to be able to draw a line in the sand and start again in a year or so and not have to avoid creditors or worry about what's coming next...   It certainly would help the environment what with the amount of letters that are arriving already(!) considering the first payment I missed was october/november (excluding the old halifax and council debts). I am exordinately stressed about it now even though I thought I would be already . Any advice would be great if it was to get my head out of the sand and contact people/do the ignoring thing and seeing what happens/reasons  to do or not to do bankruptcy for these unsecured debts?   Thanks      
    • Hi everybody   Had a knock on my door and was confronted by either a Bailiff or enforcement agent (not sure about the specific job title). When I opened the door he stuck his foot in so I couldn't close the door. I was video taping him so I took a few steps backward (to get him in shot) and he just fully entered the property despite me saying that I was denying him entry and he refused to leave thereafter.   Turns out that he was there to collect a court issued fine. I think from a Magistrates Court. He worked for this outfit:   www.marstonholdings.co.uk   The reason for the fine was something to do with "driving without car insurance". Now I had a cheap car a few years ago but it broke down and would cost more to fix than it was actually worth. So I sold the car for scrap and cancelled the insurance. Turns out you have to inform the DVLA when you scrap a car and them that it is no longer on the road (I was unaware). So this was the circumstances of the visit.   My question is did he have the lawful right to enter the property? I always thought these people were like vampires i.e. they can only come in if you invite them in.   tia Bear  
    • oppss again then if its the same person.   knows the road well so should know what the speeds are and where they apply..      
  • Our picks

becsimon

Court Action by Pub Company

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2509 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help, myself and my partner used to run 2 pubs however due to lack of support from the pub company and also extortionate rent we quit in February 2012. During March 2012 we wrote to pub company confirming that we wished to make an offer of repayment of any sums owed in respect of goods however disputed the level of rent we hd been charged on both pubs. We received no reply. In November 2012 we received a pre action protocl letter from pub companys solicitor , we sent a lengthy reply stating we had wanted to make a repayment offer in respect of the o/s goods but disputed the rent and had received no communication from the pub company. We received no reply to this letter.

 

We have now received a claim form in respect of the sum of £39,245.45 which is stated is in respect of goods. This is not broke down between goods and services. What do we do as we wish to avoid a CCJ, myself and my partner have nothing the pub trade nearly caused us to go bankrupt and we now survive on a small income, we explained to both pub company and their representation that they had nothing to gain by taking this action as we own nothing and have nothing???

 

Any advice on defences to this debt and the fact the rent and goods have been lumped together for claim form purposes?????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would need to request that they re plead their Particulars of Claim and particularise..... CPR 16.

 

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part16

 

Regards

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted a defence based on they did not allow time to reach a settlement have ignored attempts to settle, have nothing to gain by taking Court action as we have no assets or money and they they should re plead their particulars of claim, I have now received an Allocation Questionnaire??? W

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what does this mean??? Will a Judgement still be entered into, Im desparetly trying to avoid a CCJ of this size??/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get the AQ sent off to the Court within the time scale.

Judgment will only be entered by default if you ignore Court directions-or on conclusion of a trial which is some way down the line yet.Do you want help filling the AQ in ?

We have had 2 or 3 previous reported cases of pub companies taking legal action.

I will see if I can find one that I remember was a lengthly case.


Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I submitted a defence based on they did not allow time to reach a settlement have ignored attempts to settle, have nothing to gain by taking Court action as we have no assets or money and they they should re plead their particulars of claim, I have now received an Allocation Questionnaire??? W

 

You need to be very careful here. Saying that they did not allow time to reach a settlement and you have no assets is not a defence to their claim. It would only be relevant to the amount of legal costs you are ordered to pay. If there are any reasons why they are not entitled to the amounts they are claiming, you need to raise this now. You will be deemed to have admitted anything claimed in the POC that is not in defence, so it will be very difficult to challenge the amounts later. If your defence does not claim a denial of legal responsibility (as opposed to ability to pay) I imagine the pub's solicitors will try to get a summary judgment (i.e. expedited judgment without a full trial). If you want to challenge the amounts then you need to amend your defence to deny liability for the £39,245.45 and making a request for them to particularise their particulars of claim as suggested by andyorch.

 

Its important to think about your strategy generally. If you are clearly liable for the money but you just can't afford to pay, then the reality of the situation is that you cannot stop the pub from getting a CCJ. You can write to them explaining the situation but you cannot stop them. If they go for a CCJ monthly repayments would have to be agreed with the pub or set by the court at a later stage as obviously they cannot take what you do not have. Make sure you explain this in writing to the pub's solicitors in a letter with the heading "without prejudice" and it would be a good idea to offer monthly repayments. You need to try and get the solicitors to advise the pub that pursuing this might not be worth the legal costs, do not simply rely on what you told the pub before because it clearly has not been listened to.

 

If you fight the claim through the courts then you will buy some more time but remember that the loser pays the winners legal costs. If you fight this tooth and nail and take it to trial you could easily end up with an additional bill for tens of thousands for the pub's legal costs. I guess this does not matter if you literally have no assets, but do be careful if you have any assets the pub might try to get their hands on (e.g. your house if you are a homeowner).


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our argument is we agree to the money owed on the account for goods purchased, but not the rent that they have charged for the properties. They have however lumped it together as one amount for goods???? Any help with AQ would be great if you have ones against pubs??? Do I try and negotiate with solicitors directly or just deal with the Court????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you didn't explain that you aren't liable for the rent in the defence, you need to amend your defence to include it ASAP. Any arguments you want to raise in court need to go in the defence, a holding defence is not enough.

 

It is always a good idea to negotiate with the other side's solicitors, because this will help you when the court comes to look at costs and may help you get a better deal than you would otherwise. Do remember that significant legal costs will get added to the bill if this goes all the way and you lose. Given the amounts at stake it is worth trying to get some proper legal advice here. Good luck.

Edited by steampowered

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

How did you get on with this? Did you manage to defend the pubco's claim?

 

Dodge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...