Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

NHS approach to obesity 'patchy'


NewsBot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What the hell has the NHS to do with obesity, they didn't force food down peoples throats, they didn't force people to sit around doing sod all, they didn't force anyone to take the car to visit the corner shop down the road.

 

Oh it's all the governments fault. When will the nation get it into it's silly mind that the government hasn't a penny, all the funds used comes from the working people.

 

Stop blaming others and take a look at yourselves for a change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather than prejudice, how about some science as to why the NHS and government shouldn't be involved in obesity management and prevention - they haven't a clue what they're doing, except causing Conniff style prejudice against the obese.

 

The one thing I agree on get government and doctors away from nutrition advice - they're useless and making the problem worse.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/opinion/sunday/what-really-makes-us-fat.html?_r=0

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/magazine/mag-17Sugar-t.html?pagewanted=all

 

http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/healthy-eating_index.html

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

My prejudice is against people who open their mouth without thinking. Please point out the word or words I've used that show prejudice against overweight people?

 

they didn't force food down peoples throats, they didn't force people to sit

around doing sod all, they didn't force anyone to take the car to visit the

corner shop down the road.

 

If this is really the picture you have of obese people, it is prejudice - you are ascribing a set of characteristics to all members of a group, that are actually a stereotype of a member of that group.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask any doctor or nutritionist what the cycle of food is and they will tell you that basically what goes into the mouth has to come back out of the legs.

 

Why are there so many more people overweight compared with 40 or 50 years ago?

 

What I have said could be classed as stereotypical, but it definitely is not prejudice. Why would I have a prejudice against myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask any doctor or nutritionist what the cycle of food is and they will tell you that basically what goes into the mouth has to come back out of the legs.

 

Why are there so many more people overweight compared with 40 or 50 years ago?

 

What I have said could be classed as stereotypical, but it definitely is not prejudice. Why would I have a prejudice against myself.

 

Doctors have about 4 hours of nutrition training, and nutritionists are just taught the current 'a calorie is a calorie' drivel. The body is complex with loads of biochemical processes going on. The reason why so many people are overweight is the increase in sugars in our food. The demonisation of fat has meant that processed foods claiming to be low fat, will often have added sugars (including HFCS), plus many ordinary foods have sugar added. Sugar is fructose and glucose, and fructose is not metabolised in the same way as glucose. Fructose is processed by the liver, and the increased fructose causes changes in the liver leading to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in genetically susceptible people (some people can eat tonnes of sugar to little effect, and for others even small amounts of sugar will lead to insulin resistance).

 

Once a person has insulin resistance, the high carb recommendations for healthy eating will cause difficulties in maintaining a healthy weight, let alone if that person doesn't eat perfectly. Insulin resistance causes a whole raft of problems, one of which is high insulin levels which leads to increased fat deposition and also increased hunger, because the calories that would be used for energy are now beingg locked up as fat. So the person then feels the overwhelming urge to eat more.

 

So these people with high insulin levels are advised to eat low calorie diets which are high in carbs, that they can't possibly stick to because it makes them feel hungry all the time. 95% of all diets fail, and due to the insulin resistance, many will end up at a heavier weight after the diet fails.

 

In order to lose weight and keep it off, some people with severe insulin resistance will have to eat a low carb diet for the rest of their lives. But this is not accepted yet in the mainstream. Medical and nutritionist advice is based on bad science - and when I say bad science, you just need to look at who funds these studies - food manufacturers, in whose interest it is to ensure that 'a calorie is a calorie' reigns supreme, so that their processed products keep flying off of the shelves.

 

The articles I linked to cover some of the science.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the hell has the NHS to do with obesity, they didn't force food down peoples throats, they didn't force people to sit around doing sod all, they didn't force anyone to take the car to visit the corner shop down the road.

 

Oh it's all the governments fault. When will the nation get it into it's silly mind that the government hasn't a penny, all the funds used comes from the working people.

 

Stop blaming others and take a look at yourselves for a change.

 

Can you please tell that to people whose medical conditions make losing weight difficult? Some people are physically disabled, which makes exercising difficult.

 

Stop being so bloody judgmental.

 

My mum has an underactive thyroid, which makes losing weight really difficult.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...