Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have got a Final Salary Pension with my current employer which I have had since when I started back in September 2001

 

I am currently ill off work where I have been since Feb 2012

 

After long discussions with my employer they have kindly offered me the chance of voluntary redudancy/compromise agreement instead of Dismissal, this will happen Feb 2013

 

May I ask what will happen with my pension? Or what should I do?

 

Just to note I wont be returning to work in the near future due to my illness

 

Any help would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also enquire with the company about ill health early retirement instead of redundancy/compromise agreement.

 

Thanks for reply, sorry as I am a novice but what is Ill Health Retirement? I appreciate the title suggests what it is but how would this work? Also would it work out financially better for me taking this route rather than redundancy?

 

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ill health retirement usually involves the employee retiring immediately, qualifying them to start drawing a pension immediately. Instead of making a redundancy payment directly to you, they make an age-related payment into the pension fund, which helps to counteract the fact that it would have to be significantly reduced.

 

Unless you are approaching pension age anyway, the payment they'd have to make into the pension fund would normally be much more than they'd give you in redundancy, so they'd need to be feeling generous to offer it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is an option if you are unlikely to be able to work again and there is no age restriction as to when it can be paid. As for any financial advantage I could not say but I would be very careful how any agreement is worded as voluntary redundancy you are making yourself unemployed and that could have implications for any benefits you may be able to claim in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

To follow on from what Marmaris says, my understanding is that some final salary schemes will only pay an early pension to someone who is not going to work again. You've said that you're not likely to return soon, but you haven't said never.

 

It might be worth checking the rules of the scheme.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your pension scheme rules will have a section in it about retiremnt due to permanent ill-health or incapacity.

 

This normally allows you to take a full pension if you are incapable of working defore your normal pensionable age.

 

Some schemes specify that this incpacity is for disharging your normal duties and others say ANY work.

 

You should determine if you fulfill this criteria of permanancy and apply via your employer to the scheme trustees.

 

You will then usually undergo a medical assessment by a doctor appointed by the scheme or an independent specialist.

 

If you meet the criteria you will leave your employment and receive a pension equal to that you would have received assuming you had worked up untol your normal retirement age

and it will be paid immediately.

 

If you do not meet the criteia for ill-health retirement your employer shouldnt make you redundant as that is Disability Discrimination and they know it.

You cannot be treated less favourably than anyone else.

 

I suspect they ahve used the wording as interchangable with a compromise agreement when it is not.

The compromise agreement is basically paying you to go away without any admission of fault from either you or the employer.

this is popular with employers who have failed to manage someones ill health properly in the early stages

and would now be open to a claim of unfair dismissal on disability grounds where the potential damages are unlimited.

 

It basically lets you go with a pay-off and you dont sue them but the post is still available.

 

Redundancy would require proof that your job no longer exists due to 1 of several reasons and thus you cannot be replaced.

If you are made redundant you may be eligible to take your pension early depending on the scheme rules and your age (over 55).

 

The employer would have to pay extra in to make up the actuarial strain of the pension scheme so they wont be keen on this if you can take retirement benefits.

 

Alternatively they can sack you on capability grounds and risk an unfair dismissal for Disanbility Discrimination claim from you.

 

If you take the money from a compromise or redundancy and dont qualify for an immediate pension your pension will be effectively frozen until you reach your scheme's normal retirement age.

 

I would speak to your personnel/HR dept and ask them to consider the ill-health route first

and then make noises about disability discrimination and see what they offer as a settlement.

 

If you are old enough to take an early pension then I would recommend it unless the scheme prohibits you from working in the future

-many prohibit working in the same field-

ie teachers cant retire for any reason and then do supply teaching but can do other work that is not pensionable.

 

They are obviously willing to pay you something to avoid a fuss so make sure that what they offer is enough to make it worthwhile to you.

 

Bear in mind that if it all goes wrong you can have your day in an employment tribunal but there is no guarantee of success

unless you have certain illnesses that automatically qualify.

 

Average payout for DD in these cases is £11k so not enough to keep you for the rest of your life.

 

I wish you the best for your future and let me know how you progress.

I retired on ill-health grounds and 5 years later I am still battling for the correct pension entitlement.

Luckily I have other income and no debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...