Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Electric shock at work...Entitled to compensation ?


lfcfan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4137 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey was wondering if anyone could help.

 

my girlfriend works as a health care assistant in a Hospital.

 

Yesterday she went to unplug a machine from the socket which seemed fine but when she pulled out the plug she got quite a shock and the socket came partly off the wall.

 

She felt a lot of pain shoot all up her arm and jumped backwards.

 

Her fingers and arm started to go red and was told by a nurse to go to A&E to get seen to

.She had an ECG and then was told to fill out a datix form.

Thankfully everything was okay apart from her whole arm tingling the whole night.

Today there's no tingling but her arm still feels a bit numb.

She was told to go back in a few days to get checked out again.

 

When she got home last night she told her friend what had happened.

This friend was a health care assistant on the same ward as my girlfriend but left a few months ago to pursue another career.

Her friend told her that she had complained to a staff nurse about the very same socket months and months ago.

The staff nurse just said to her "there's a screw driver in the draw in the office".

 

this socket has been faulty for months and months and has resulted in my girlfriend getting an electric shock due to the Hospitals negligence

and failure to ensure the safety of its staff.

 

My girlfriend has taken a picture of her arm which clearly shows redness and also the socket hanging off the wall from where she pulled the plug out.

 

i'm wondering if she has a case for claiming compensation ?.

 

To be honest i'm just glad she's okay but i'm VERY annoyed that it could of been avoided had the Nurse acted accordingly once being told of the faulty socket.

 

Amazingly straight after it happened they had an electrician come and sort it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

As this is to do with an electrical socket, bear in mind that all electrical items in a hospital are tested and a label stuck on them with the date tested and passed, so did that socket have a label on it to certify it had passed that test.

 

If you can actually prove that this socket was acutally reported some time ago and not sealed off so no one used this socket until fault fixed then this is also a health and safety issue as well.

 

Have they (by they I mean the senior ward staff member that was present at incident) reported the fault with this socket since this incident and prevented other from using that socket also?

Edited by stu007
  • Confused 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't necessarily agree with a compensation claim in this case - I don't think it would go too far anyway, but the H&S issue definitely needs to be escalated as if there is a next time, the damage could be real and life threatening. Accident Book, get the socket taken out of commission until it is fixed, immediate report to the management - whatever it takes to get it fixed.

  • Confused 1

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be wrong but i think the datix form acts as an accident book.Not sure.

 

The plug has no label on it.I know the kind of label you mean as my place of work has them on all of our plugs.The only evidence that the faulty socket was reported to senior ward staff months ago is the word of my girlfriends friend.But then if it has been faulty for that long i'm sure someone else has noticed it in that time.An electrician was apparently called after the incident.Whether it has been sorted i'm not sure as she doesn't go back to work until Thursday.I do know they didn't seal off the socket as she went back to the ward after A&E to take a picture of the socket.

 

IMG_2200_zpsbeb30b06.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds to me as if the compensation would be pretty minimal - but yes, you could get some.

 

Looking at the picture, is see that the loose screw is a wood screw so it is obviously a bitch job anyway.

Some one will get killed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Tut tut tut to that NHS hospital so when was this socket checked and actually tested and certified as such and where is the passed label that should be on that socket.

 

This is disgraceful that they later went back to tack a photo and the socket was still like that and even more worrying is what is actually plugged into that socket.

 

Immediate action should have been taken with the being reported and sealed off until fault repaired obviously Health & Safety seems to be a lax joke with this hospital willing to put employees and patients at risk.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Tut tut tut to that NHS hospital so when was this socket checked and actually tested and certified as such and where is the passed label that should be on that socket.

 

Sorry but I don't agree about this. The labels you mention are put on equipment that has been 'PAT' tested but is not put on the sockets equipment goes into - and I worked in hospitals for almost 20 years up until last year so would have seen if there were labels on the sockets!!

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to agree, having seen the photo - PAT testing refers to portable appliance testing and would only cover items that are plugged into the socket, not the delivery system or equipment.

 

Having been notified of a fault however the hospital should have had this repaired as soon as possible and put out of bounds immediately.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...