Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HR / Legal advice please.. Re: Colleague urinating in my cup.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4135 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

In June this year I received notice of a bullying claim against me instigated by a more senior manager at work who had been off with stress since February.

 

to cut a long story short

I was suspended 3 weeks ago due to some emails with another colleague (totally unrelated to the bullying claim) and which date back to 2009.

 

The manager is now on a phased return to work and last week he removed my mug from my desk,

urinated in it and left it in the store room where it was found by another member of staff.

 

Senior Management have now been informed of the occurrence but obviously have not as yet acted on it

but I have my suspicions that they will not do anything.

 

I would be grateful for any advice on the following...

 

Have any criminal offences been committed relating to..

A) the theft of my cup

B) the store room is used by technicians and other members of staff passing through

C) Health & Safety implications

 

I am aware I have a lot of support from colleagues as the Manager concerned allowed me to undertake many roles that should have been assigned to him

and I believe this to be part of the reason for the grievance.

 

For this reason I think he didn't feel confident to walk down the corridor to use the male toilets.

 

This doesn't however give him the right to urinate in my mug and leave it where anyone could find it.

(There are several buckets he could have used as an alternative).

 

The reason I feel the company may not act is because they have allowed him to return to work as "fit for work"

yet clearly he is not so by taking him down the disciplinary route they will leave themselves wide open for failing in their "duty of care".

 

What should I do?

 

If I take out a grievance myself I risk being persecuted even more

 

should I sit back and say nothing and bring it up at a later date after the outcome of the disciplinary hearing?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

In June this year I received notice of a bullying claim against me instigated by a more senior manager at work who had been off with stress since February.

 

to cut a long story short

I was suspended 3 weeks ago due to some emails with another colleague (totally unrelated to the bullying claim) and which date back to 2009.

 

The manager is now on a phased return to work and last week he removed my mug from my desk,

urinated in it and left it in the store room where it was found by another member of staff.

 

Senior Management have now been informed of the occurrence but obviously have not as yet acted on it

but I have my suspicions that they will not do anything.

 

I would be grateful for any advice on the following...

 

Have any criminal offences been committed relating to..

A) the theft of my cup - Probably not - certainly nothing that would warrant such a claim - depending of course on any particular sentimental value

B) the store room is used by technicians and other members of staff passing through - is this a question or a statement?

C) Health & Safety implications - Absolutely yes, this would be the major issue, together with the personal nature of the act

 

I am aware I have a lot of support from colleagues as the Manager concerned allowed me to undertake many roles that should have been assigned to him

and I believe this to be part of the reason for the grievance.

 

For this reason I think he didn't feel confident to walk down the corridor to use the male toilets.

 

This doesn't however give him the right to urinate in my mug and leave it where anyone could find it.

(There are several buckets he could have used as an alternative). Why would he use a bucket and not a toilet? Is it common practice to wee in a bucket at your workplace - it certainly isn't in mine!

 

The reason I feel the company may not act is because they have allowed him to return to work as "fit for work"

yet clearly he is not so by taking him down the disciplinary route they will leave themselves wide open for failing in their "duty of care".

 

What should I do?

If I take out a grievance myself I risk being persecuted even more - You can't be persecuted (lawfully at least) for raising a grievance, although obviously it may be awkward

 

should I sit back and say nothing and bring it up at a later date after the outcome of the disciplinary hearing?

 

Absolutely not - I would be outraged at his actions and would be extremely vocal in my complaint

Thanks

 

If you do not feel able to raise a formal grievance (although if you are suspended at present I don't see that you have any reason not to do so), I would certainly approach the management and demand that some action is taken. This person's actions are outrageous and in any civilised workplace this would result in dismissal, although after the comment about using a bucket I wonder what is actually commonplace

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do not feel able to raise a formal grievance (although if you are suspended at present I don't see that you have any reason not to do so), I would certainly approach the management and demand that some action is taken. This person's actions are outrageous and in any civilised workplace this would result in dismissal, although after the comment about using a bucket I wonder what is actually commonplace

 

Thank you for your reply. I can say it definitely isn't commonplace to wee in a bucket in my workplace it was just to make the observation that there were alternatives to taking my cup which to me makes it even worse.

I mentioned others using the area because I wondered if this meant he had technically urinated in a public place as this in itself is illegal. I am not sure if a workplace is classed as a public place though.

The question in relation to it being theft struck me as I very much doubt he was planning to wash it out and return it to my desk. If he did then there is clearly a breach of Health and Safety.

 

Thank you for taking the time to respond, it is all very much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The one thing that is not clear is who actually witnessed the removal of your cup from your desk and the manager urinating in it. was this actually witnessed or on cctv at all?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the person concerned advised a colloeague he needed the toilet and went into the store room area. The cup was later found by another member of staff. I do not know when the cup was removed from my desk but it would not have been difficult to take as our desks are only a few feet from each other.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

How bizarre. Personally I think the best approach would be to simply inform senior management in writing or in an email what happened. This way you are making them aware of it and leaving a clear paper trail. I think raising a more formal grievance risks getting yourself involved in this guy's affairs which is not what you want. He sounds like a nutcase, no doubt there will be other issues with this guy that management have to deal with.

 

I think you have dealt with this amazingly well. You are taking absolutely the right approach by recognising that the behaviour is unacceptable but also not getting too upset about it. If someone peed in my mug I would go absolutely bananas!

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts exactly. I am absolutely livid about it but I am trying to stay rational and think about the bigger picture. There are massive holes in the grievance investigation of which I have plenty of supporting evidence that I am going to address in the future and it has been handled very badly from start to finish. The company jumped through hoops to get this guy back into work and I think this is part of the reason why I was suspended so that he could be brought back in without me being there. The problem they have is that my job role and salary is bespoke and there is no equivalent role within the organisation so I could not simply be moved to another area and do the same job. If they were to do this without finding me guilty of a misconduct then it could be seen as constructive dismissal.

The guy has had previous absences with stress and managers have never had any training or support from the organisation ie to make sure the person is coping when they return etc. There are no follow up meetings with Occupational Health or HR and so if the stress were to reoccur it is unforeseen.

Since the grievance started everyone in the company has been sent on various courses, policies have been rewritten and created and I believe the organisation is trying to cover its own failings by deflecting these issues.

As soon as I report the incident above, it will turn right back around and point to the organisation for failing in their duty of care to ensure that the guy was ready to return to work! Their only option would be to turn it back onto they this guy in that he failed under the "employee's responsibilities" of the Health and Safety at work act in failing to report he was unfit for work. As a manager he should be well aware of this legislation but I can say with total conviction that he doesn't !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have briefly read thru some of the posts....my advice is to lodge a grievence in ASAP recording every thing that you are aggrieved about.

 

You are already suspended, you may lose your job and if did lose your job then you can take all the recorded paperwork as evidence to an employment tribunal

 

Basically, you need to be gathering evidence with a paper trail, which companies do not like.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately I have logged everything, I have copies of every email in relation to the grievance and have logged every phone call. Nobody in our office was even interviewed and the one person I requested to be interviewed was refused. There were only about 5 specific allegations and at least 3 of them were from 2008 or before which to me makes the whole thing a complete farce. I was not given signed copies of the grievance statement and was then asked questions which weren't even on the statement. I was refused an alternative date so that my Union Rep could attend and so I had to go in on my own. I also have a lot of evidence that the senior manager who heard the grievance is basically guilty of breaking all sorts of E&D rules and Data Protection etc and I don't think he was competent to even hear the grievance. He received the paperwork on the Tuesday and the hearing was on the Friday. He didn't even meet with me.

Even the evidence they have presented as the reason for suspending me was from 3 years ago and it isn't anything particularly bad!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...