Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Obviously the real proof will come when the contract is revealed. In the meantime you could write to the DVLA asking who applied for your data back in 2017. And show them the signage where both companies are listed and ask in view of who asked for your details, did the right one apply and what is their view on both companies showing on the sign. Is this legal and explain that you are in the middle of a Court case and they may be called.
    • dear simple simon. with ref claim xxxxxx on xxxx date you sent me proof of the signs at the time of you issuing the parking charge notices listed in your particulars of claim of the above court claim    these signs are not in the name of the claimant stated on the claimform ref above....   should you wish to continue with the said claim , i give notice this file will form part of my evidence should you wish to proceed and waste court time.   just musing
    • Applications for Summary Judgment are not awarded on who did or didn't do what......they cant get a default judgment on either as you have submitted a defence...they could get Summary Judgment.   Summary judgment is only awarded in the follow circumstances...   ·        A claim or issue or a defence to a claim or issue has no real prospect of success and ·        There is no other compelling reason for a trial. (CPR 24.2)   Summary judgment a Quick guide.docx
    • What I’ve read elsewhere (and from being in touch with someone who has won using the above argument - but who also notes that others have lost using the same argument- it seems to be dependent upon the court/judge) is that it is possible to win BUT I’m not entirely certain if it holds actual legal weight.    @dx100uk write a letter you say? To DBL or VCS?   something like this??;   I am writing in respect to the above noted County Court Claim issued by your legal team in connection to three separate Parking Charge Notices (PCNs) issued to vehicle registration mark XXXXXX. I was the named keeper of the vehicle at the time of the PCN issue but do not claim liability.   I wish you to note the following; whilst you may ‘think’ that you have adequate grounds to make this claim, the simple facts are that you have absolutely no right (in law??) and the evidence I have uncovered as a direct result of your claim, along with the evidence and wording contained in the communications you sent to me (dated XX August 2017) irrefutably show that you (Vehicle Control Services) have absolutely no claim in law.   Please be aware that should continue to pursue this claim not only will you incur your own costs but also costs that I will be claiming against you for bringing this unfounded and malicious claim which bears no legal weight whatsoever and is in breach of the IPC Code of Conduct (Versions 5 and 6).  Subsequently, I will be reporting you to the ICO for improper use of KADOE and to the IPC for breach of the Code of Conduct.   Yours faithfully,     Scans coming later.... 
    • Always looking for plan b -    the defence is short and poor and not laid out in the correct format - because I didn’t do it    but the points are the same just brief ,    would they have tried for summary judgement if I laid out a bigger defence - yes , they already put on allocation they would apply for one ☝️ n both claims -    they didn’t on claim one as I had a long defence , they did on claim 2 as defence small So did what they said they would do  -    they effectively want my defence struck out , to get a judgement by default , as there chances of winning in court are slim    maybe I include photocopy of that form and say they always were going to apply for this, they did not get to this point by my poor defence , I don’t have to bear their costs 
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 928 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bournemouth are top, Liverpool should have too much, but anything is possible. They should go for Schwarzer in January, still a very good keeper.

 

 

Ochao apparently!

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hodgson got it wrong, the press picked the team. He should have kept faith with Cole, more of the older heads. The defence was shocking at times.

 

Liverpool through to the semi's, meet Chelsea.:-)

Shame none of them were in the England team ;)
Link to post
Share on other sites
...

Liverpool through to the semi's, meet Chelsea.:-)

 

 

was a fairly good game, good goals. b'mouthe had some good chances (in part thanks to our usual slack panic defending), can see why they're top of the 'ship. hopefully by jan, we'll be more on form and give the russian roubles a run for their money :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fulham win, played average first half, good second half, average overall.

Birmingham win again. Tottenham win, but should be scoring more goals.

Man City win, without any strikers, Amazon Germany have a few.

Hearts win again, I've got two winning teams scary or what.

Liverpool play tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearts win again

 

:whoo:

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive got a gut feeling we will be meeting in the playoffs:madgrin:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are going for auto promotion, we would be top right now, if we had shown recent form from the start of the season. We lost the first 8 games of the season.

 

Ive got a gut feeling we will be meeting in the playoffs:madgrin:
Link to post
Share on other sites

lfc draw v the arse, we shld've won. slack defending again. 9 pts off 4th! unless we win the next 3 or 4, no chance. will have to win the uefa cup to get in the euro cup :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hearts won again, on tues.

 

12 points clear now, away to Livingston tomorrow.

Rangers play Hibs at Easter Road.

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearts win 1-0 at Livingston :)

Rangers lose 4-0 to Hibs.

 

Hearts 15 points clear.

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hearts win 1-0 at Livingston :)

Rangers lose 4-0 to Hibs.

 

Hearts 15 points clear.

 

50pts, roll on the spl, can they do it unbeaten :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
50pts, roll on the spl, can they do it unbeaten :)

 

Very much doubt it, bookies are offering 5/1

and 11/8 unbeaten at Tynecastle.

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Above Fulham at last!

 

Got very wet at Dean Court boxingday

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not happy about that at all, but were not playing well, we can't expect too much at the moment. Enjoy it won't last long. Hehe.

 

Above Fulham at last!

 

Got very wet at Dean Court boxingday

Link to post
Share on other sites
We lost again, not great.

 

The clearance was a great goal for LFC.

 

to brighton! at least you wont go down now. maybe wld've if felix was still in charge

 

:) was handball

 

Pardew to palace!

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...