Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Ade,   Stop speaking to them by phone and keep contact in writing only, which you've said you prefer.   Send TT a SAR by post immediately. The data you get back should enable you to see what they think you owe, and how it's made up.   Also write to BW Legal confirming you dispute the alleged debt owed to TT and have written to TT seeking data, so BWL must stop demands until TT have replied to the SAR you've sent them.
    • Please do although obviously I don’t know the facts from your side but at least I can tell you how much of a cut and paste job it is.
    • Please check back for a full reply tomorrow. However, it would help if you would introduce pergo spaces into a story full stop it's very long and especially for people with small screens it's very difficult to follow when it is so compacted.   I think this straight has become rather confused because of the third party account which we received at the outset. I think it will probably be helpful if you could repost your story but on a new thread and more openly spaced please.   Then we can start to have a closer look at it. However, as I've already suggested, I think there are two issues. The question of your liability in the accident and the problem of how you have been persuaded to take a rental car at such a high rate.    I would suggest that you hold off telephoneing anyone until we have had a closer look.before you do anything on the telephone. You have obviously had some very important conversations but you don't have any evidence of them. Although the other side may say that they have recorded them, you you may find it difficult to get hold of those recordings if in fact those recordings incriminate them in any way. for instance if they have promised you that you don't have to pay anything for the hire car, that would be an extremely useful conversation to have but you may find that it is difficult to get hold of.   please start a new thread it will be much easier to continue from there                                
    • When I sadly lost my job a while back, i reportd it immpediately to DWP as you are supposed to, but didnt realise at the time that the day I reported to them was the day before I was paid out for the last month. I was actually paid extra whem I left as it was cheaper than redundancy fort the business and at the time it was a good financial move (so I thought).   I was paid on Fri 26th Jan, they paid me out 2 months in one go. I reported to DWP on the 22nd of Han that I was made unemployed, had the letters and evidence. As they spun the story, because of their assesment dates and that, my first payment was on the 1st May and reassured that it works the other way around. That when work starts again, if I dont actually receive money from the company during the assesment period, there wont be an issue as it balances up.   Can I believe this or was it another spun story? I'm concerned that as I'll be paid monthly, (Starting on the 15th paid on the last day of the month), assment ends on the 22nd. Tha they'll take that money into consideration.   I'm just concerned due to the disparity it would cause between 4 odd months I endured with zero income because of how their system works and whatever they ahe in place to counter at this end of the claim.   Anywa, it's just awonder.   Cheers,   Ade    
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies
  • Recommended Topics

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 965 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Jimmy Hill is to blame, as he forced the removeal of the cap on players wages in the 1960's.

 

 

£23 per week, that what we pay now ( except when we had Zigic):madgrin:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

.... the players are wimps and roll around on the ground holding their ankle when the replay shows they were never touched?

Even if they were nudged in the arm they roll around on the ground holding their ankle.

 

its funny that they still do all that despite all the cameras which will show post whether or not there was any contact etc.

one that made me laugh last w'end was the guy who clearly handled (wasnt given) and he then went to hold his face as if ball had hit his face not his hand. poor.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that where he saves the shot and Howard makes the secondary save? They could introduce that next season:-)

 

its funny that they still do all that despite all the cameras which will show post whether or not there was any contact etc.

one that made me laugh last w'end was the guy who clearly handled (wasnt given) and he then went to hold his face as if ball had hit his face not his hand. poor.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Is that where he saves the shot and Howard makes the secondary save? ...

 

not that one i dont think. that was the one where he dived on the ball (as a keeper wld)?

the one i mean, cant recall the game atm, was edge/in the box touchline side.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

O.K. mine was a clear save by the defender at full streach. If the keeper ever goes AWOL, the defender can just step in.

 

not that one i dont think. that was the one where he dived on the ball (as a keeper wld)?

the one i mean, cant recall the game atm, was edge/in the box touchline side.

Link to post
Share on other sites
O.K. mine was a clear save by the defender at full streach. If the keeper ever goes AWOL, the defender can just step in.

 

:) that was the one re the shot just outside the box, player dived on the ball with hand? reminded me of henchoz v the arse fa cup final.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fulham win, Liverpool lose, Tottenham lose, Birmingham draw, Hearts not playing. Austin couldn't stop scoring, only one counted. Newcastle flying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

poor lfc defending again, how many unchallenged chelskis waiting to put the equaliser in. another defender (cahill) 'diving' on the ball, we shld have had a pen. but, that aside, we are in trouble. newcastle, stoke, swansea, hammers now above us! at least though we're still not that far off 4th. if the magpies can turn it around, surely we can :)

 

hearts won?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it, 1-0 against Raith. You should have had 2 pens, he actually does quite a lot of that, dive towards the ball.

 

poor lfc defending again, how many unchallenged chelskis waiting to put the equaliser in. another defender (cahill) 'diving' on the ball, we shld have had a pen. but, that aside, we are in trouble. newcastle, stoke, swansea, hammers now above us! at least though we're still not that far off 4th. if the magpies can turn it around, surely we can :)

 

hearts won?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Got it, 1-0 against Raith.

 

Another 'fluke' (as the Hibs manager said last week) from Ozturk 30 yarder :)

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites
Got it, 1-0 against Raith. You should have had 2 pens, he actually does quite a lot of that, dive towards the ball.

 

 

cant believe the ref missed the second one, clear view.

at least can cheer on the tarts :)

fulham, brum doing ok. maybe we also need a change of manager? :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fulham, brum doing ok. maybe we need a change of manager? :)

 

you cant have Gary:-D

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are great at shooting from long range, same a couple of weeks ago.:-)

 

Another 'fluke' (as the Hibs manager said last week) from Ozturk 30 yarder :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Germany v Gibralter, going to be a crazy scoreline, 15 - 0, although Germany has been rubbish recently.

 

scot v the irish rep tonight, shld be a good one :)

NI in action as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
scot v the irish rep tonight, shld be a good one :)

NI in action as well.

 

Scotland win :)

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites
Scotland win :)

 

 

good goal. thought it wld be a bit 'hotter' game though. maybe they are all friends :)

 

NI lost, but still in there.

 

England just now

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearts at 5.30 :)

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

eng win after a scare.

 

faroes beat greece, ranieri resigns. san marino draw, germany only win by 4 v gibraltor...no 'easy' internationals anymore :)

 

hearts win :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yea, they thought the other team were going to turn up :)

 

were poor until they scored. same old though, good in qualifying, but can we do it in the tournament?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Wiltshire was poor, but he get's MOTM:!:

Well Done to Hearts, can't stop winning.

Well Done to Scotland and Faroe Islands, population (50,000).

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...