Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apologies I hadn't seen that uploads need to be in PDF.   I have received the attached letter from STA which I assume is a standard letter as I've never spoken to them on the phone. I'm not sure what they mean by 're-commence recovery action'? Do I just continue to ignore them?   I have been in contact with the Uni who insist I need to pay the fees as I left the course after the first three weeks. They have not provided any evidence/documents that I signed an agreement to pay the fees or that I acknowledged that fees would be due if the course was left early. They referred me to their website which undoubtedly has changed since I was there.    I appreciate I shouldn't reply to STA however I'm not sure how to proceed with this overall.   I've read the claim form page and I'm not clear if I can request a copy of a credit agreement from the Uni as I'm not sure if its standard for a University to have required a credit agreement to be signed?    I'm not really clear what happens next and at what point I need to act. I've read about lots of different cases (fee related and non fee related) but can't find information on a case that is similar to mine. Do I wait until the Uni begins a formal action? I am concerned as I don't want the amount to increase from the already significant amount they are demanding.     Many thanks for any help you can offer.  staletter.pdf
    • I have now received some interesting responses....   Firstly - Lowell have sent a without prejudice letter offering a settlement of £3750 for a single payment or £4000 payable in instalments of £50pcm   Second - Lowell also sent a previous letter with the copy of the agreement saying it was the one they filed to court in 2018.  However I have not yet had it acknowledged from the court that they received a certificate of service for this.    Third - The court wrote to me today from the proper officer stating a video hearing will be heard 14 May 2021.    Dealing with each one in tern, I see the court hasn't responded to my email asking them to strike out the claim on the basis that Lowell haven't adhered to the order and that I haven't received the original documents and have now set this hearing date.    I note Lowell are willing to take an offer which is of interest. However I am inclined on the costs issue and trying to 'get rid' of the matter as cost effective and expediently as possibly to make a counter offer (at what level I am not quite sure yet).    Is there a letter template to use to draft a settlement or something that I can use to start with?     In Lowell settlement letter they are claiming it is not statute barred and that a payment was made to them for £200.  I have tried to go through everything and all I can find with the help of Santander who were my bank at the time, is a payment of £200 paid to Lloyds, but this does not have a reference on it only a s/c and a/c number.    How best is it to proceed?   Court Order 22_02_2021.pdf Response to Order.pdf Offer Letter.pdf
    • yes I have conversed over email and sent them forms both in email and by royal mail, firstly with erudio, then they sent it to capquest, then it went back to erudio and now with shoosmiths for a few years now.   And yes they are well aware of my correct and current address, I have only ever moved once since the loan and that was before Erudio and it was all plain sailing with Saas/slc.
    • 2 days now and the insurers have done nothing - just making it much more stressful.  
    • Pretty sure you are correct its not by royal mail either they are well aware of you correct and current address? so I'd ignore them.   Did you converse by email previously?? And or send your forms via email? Or royal mail?
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 956 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Liverpool win, Tottenham win and Fulham lose, in the League Cup, well done to the winning teams, I really mean it:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites
official statement-

Rowett was the outstanding candidate during a thorough recruitment process over the past seven days.

 

 

roughly translated-

 

offered to work for less than anyone else:wink:

 

lee clark already back in management, blackpool boss.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
lee clark already back in management already, blackpool boss.

 

reckon he will do ok

 

lack of funds was the problem imo

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lee Clark got the job ahead of the 'mascot', Blackpool were in the Prem a couple of years ago, example of what can happen if you get it wrong.

 

reckon he will do ok

 

lack of funds was the problem imo

Link to post
Share on other sites
poor showing by lfc, again! at least we're still not far off 4th.....atm :)

 

new managers brum and fulham draw

 

fair enough start:-)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not a good report, there will always be the moronic fringe i'm afraid

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearts draw Celtic in the Scottish Cup, at least it's at Tynecastle though they gubbed us 7-0 last time :)

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites
Is Sturridge out for another week? They need him back, big season ahead.

 

 

we need more than sturridge :) flanagan out is also a miss.

rodgers words back to haunt him; re spurs last season he said spurs having spent 100 odd mil following bale sale they shld be up there challenging for the title...:)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
v one of the top teams, so not bad :)

v the top one on tues

 

what a manager:wink:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah football, the game for wimps and cheats.

 

There must be more cheating in one game of footy than in a whole season of other sport, especially by the likes of MU and Liverpool.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong, wrong, wrong. If you look at any sport, they all have an element of gamesmanship, maybe to different degrees, but for a one end result, to win. Name me a sport, I'll tell you where the gamesmanship exists.

 

Ah football, the game for wimps and cheats.

 

There must be more cheating in one game of footy than in a whole season of other sport, especially by the likes of MU and Liverpool.

Link to post
Share on other sites
what a manager:wink:

 

:)

 

 

re wimps; recent pics of balo in training with a snood and gloves made me laugh. it wasn't that cold then, still isnt :)

 

 

 

fulham v the bottom club tonight

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm In Amsterdam tonight, Ajax v Barcelona.

But I've not got a ticket :(

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm In Amsterdam tonight, Ajax v Barcelona.

But I've not got a ticket :(

 

 

amsterdam! wld you have been able to find your way to the stad though :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool lose but played well, we drew but played poorly first half, new manager but very poor decisions. Drawing matches we should be winning. Birmingham win, great result. Tottenham winning. Kane scoring again.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wrong, wrong, wrong. If you look at any sport, they all have an element of gamesmanship, maybe to different degrees, but for a one end result, to win. Name me a sport, I'll tell you where the gamesmanship exists.

 

It's not wrong. Name another game where the players are wimps and roll around on the ground holding their ankle when the replay shows they were never touched?

Even if they were nudged in the arm they roll around on the ground holding their ankle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot of 'simulation', generally it's done to get an opposition player sent off. It is wrong but it goes on. It's gamesmanship.

 

Do you think there is any 'gamesmanship' in tennis?

 

It's not wrong. Name another game where the players are wimps and roll around on the ground holding their ankle when the replay shows they were never touched?

Even if they were nudged in the arm they roll around on the ground holding their ankle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jimmy Hill is to blame, as he forced the removeal of the cap on players wages in the 1960's.

 

But I haven't seen a tennis player rolling around on the ground oh ah oh oh oh. Grossly overpaid, big headed wimps.

I still watch it every weekend though.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...