Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Bankfodder thank you for your interest and your comments.   There are issues with ground rents AND service charges. In my case, non residential, not eligeable for Tier 1 tribunal so there is no possibility of holding the leaseholder to account for unreasonable service charges because of the loophole below. Even if it is residential see Richard Barclay and others quoted in the article above. You win the case about unreasonable costs yet have to pay the leaseholders court fees for loosing their case! Criminal!!!   From the article I quoted above.  'The Times reported that last year leasehold owner Richard Barclay successfully recovered £1,200 of a £10,100 service charge from the management company in respect of his central London Flat. But the victory soon turned sour when Barclay was hit with a bill for £61,300 in legal fees by Quadrant Property Management who takes care of the building.   The loophole is contained in the majority of leases which typically allow freeholders to recoup their legal costs from leaseholders, even if the freeholder loses the case. There is no parallel right for leaseholders to claim costs back.    
    • The online retailer wants to buy the brands, not their shops, suggesting any deal would cost jobs. View the full article
    • I have gone through nearly the whole sar return, it is very large. I am confident to say there is no mention of a default notice within it. 
    • Change Zoom to Online as Zoom is only one platform, and they might use another, it has become the accepted terminology, but best not to refer to a specific platform.  Otherwise looks good The rteal devil of Simon's claim is that he is trying to imply a contract that depends on a Prohibition for Consideration, And its one sided as the person he is binding has no benefit from the contract, apart from paying £100 for the privilege of stopping however briefly.  a nanosecond, a minute 30 minutes kerching that'll be £100 or else.  Simon has also invoiced cars stopped at a Zebra crossing with people crossing at an airport.
    • When she rang BT did she just "mention" about cancelling her Bb contract or did she actually tell them to cancel it?   I've just renegotiated my Bb contract with BT (I know they're useless but I can't be bothered doing too much work to look at any other provider) and I've managed to save money plus they are meant to record 'phone calls and I know (because I spoke to several different call handlers over two weeks) thatthey take very accurate notes of their conversations with customers.   She needs to find out if she actually did cancel the contract.  (I'm sure others will suggest doing a SAR).   Also what sort of contract did she have with BT?  Presumably it included Bb, mobile phone and Sky?  If the contract had just renewed, BT should have emailed her confirming contract details including duration, how to cancel and cancelation fees.  They've just done this for me for the contract I renegotiated two days ago.   EDIT:  It's not clear, but are you saying she's been charged £800 cancelation for Bb or are you saying shae hasn't paid them £800 she owes on her phone?   She ought to be able to look at her BT account online to see what she owes and how her bills are made up.  
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 925 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

All liverpool have to do now is beat Norwich, and have chelsea lose or draw and the titles pretty much theirs.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All liverpool have to do now is beat Norwich......

 

:) another suarez hat trick v norwich? what are the odds on that?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
:) another suarez hat trick v norwich? what are the odds on that?

 

 

now around 7/1. thought it wld be better than that!

how about sterling or coutinho at around 66/1?

:)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Liverpool got the bottle ?

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

People keep asking that and they've proved it time and time again. The games against arsenal, spurs, Everton, at old Trafford and man city.

 

Thing is Jose likes to stifle the game, play slowly and bore the hell of the spectator. If he tries to play for the draw at anfield, that will suit us as they need the win. If he comes and attacks us, that will also suit us, just like it did versus city.

 

I don't think city or Chelsea, if they win it, can truly say they deserve it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Have Liverpool got the bottle ?

 

 

so far, yes. :) looking like have got the magnum :)

 

 

classless chelski (jose) spitting sour grapes out again :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

apparently they timed it just right; apparently failure to qualify for champs league (now imposs after defeat to the toffees) reduces the compensation package ?

shame though, as he prob would've kept manure mid table :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all to do with expectations, at Everton they had none, but Man Utd have plenty, all to do with recent history, Liverpool have none at the moment, when they do have some then we will see.

 

apparently they timed it just right; apparently failure to qualify for champs league (now imposs after defeat to the toffees) reduces the compensation package ?

shame though, as he prob would've kept manure mid table :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:)

lfc do have expectations now, as always, and they've proven themselves regardless this season. yes, next season will be challenging but thats what we want.

its mostly moyes. as posted before, see how everton are doing with virtually the same players with the same 'expectations' but a different manager.

manure players no doubt also to blame

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No but he will instill some fight into the squad. I hope Chelsea do the business on Saturday.:-)

 

Ah, you like the French Farmers then:madgrin:
Link to post
Share on other sites
.. I hope Chelsea do the business on Saturday.:-)

 

 

so do i, then they'll be more tired for their game at anfield on sunday :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's on Saturday on my Sony Playstation a 3-0 hiding, the Reds turned over by the Blues :madgrin:

 

so do i, then they'll be more tired for their game at anfield on sunday :)
Link to post
Share on other sites
..., wonder how Chelsea will do tnite...

 

 

 

hopefully they'll do enough to be more interested in the return leg then the game on sunday. which they'll be further knackered for after doing some business on saturday. :)

then get to the final, then get whipped by ......

but, atletico is my outside bet :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't just no. 8, it was a collective, of high kicks, shin kicks, head knocks, even the goalie wasn't safe.

 

A thought, how is it you can be 36 ish not really played football, be Manager of two teams and told to go early with 10 mil from each club. If you can play Fifa online you too could achieve this goal:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Runners up isn't as bad as it sounds, still a long way to go:-)

 

Well it's on Saturday on my Sony Playstation a 3-0 hiding, the Reds turned over by the Blues :madgrin:
Link to post
Share on other sites

a game too far for lfc, we didn't seem to have the usual 'blitzkrieg', and mistake cost us again! good game though, typical well played jose tactics.

and, city already one up!

the pundits cursed us :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...