Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you please show the back of the first PCN you received round about 17th January. Was there a WS included or just the PE v Beavis case?
    • Hey have filed a defence at 4pm today the day before I could request a judgement.  I thought it was last Friday but it was infact tomorrow they would have ran out of time 
    • Hello All,   My query is about the Service charge. I am leaseholder of a 3 bed flat in a purpose build block in London (Westminster) our service charge used to reflect the maintenance of the building and overall look and feel. But now not only service charge goes up every year but quality of service like general maintenance gone down. For example lifts keep breaking down, building needs refurb, walls are dirty, my windows are so old that in winter no matter how much heating you put on room still feel cold.    additionally they keep adding major works charges to service charge with this year being £1917 in addition to £1890 service charge. Don’t mind paying only if I see improvement in the block but we have only seen steady decline over many years now. So today I called them (city of Westminster) saying I don’t want to pay and cannot pay so high charges where there’s no evident results.    I came here to find if anyone has been successful in negotiations on regards to service charges complain or any advice regarding this. Charges are too for what we get    Thanks in advance  
    • this is going to be really simplistic, but have they started by talking to senior management now the bad apple has gone?
    • Hi everyone  . . .  Just an update   The CMD was this morning.  It started with cheap  manoeuvrability  by Intrum’s lawyer, but let me give you quick summery background:   The judge issued an order to us to submit evidence supporting our case such as call for witnesses or ask the court to order the original creditor to some action.  We were giving 21 days for the submission.  In my simple calculation without, allowing time to post, the final date was to be 10 March 2021, with post time 2 days later.   On the 10th March, and to be on the safe side, I send to the court the response version giving to me by DX100UK.   Then on 12th March, I send to the court the version giving to me by Andy, asking the court to replace the first document with the second  one.   On 7th of April I send Intrum lawyer the document 2 as it is our official response.   ON the 12th April I send the court the medical certificate for my niece asking to be viewed exclusively by the court.   At the start of the CMD the Judge ask Intrum lawyer to start.  So he started by claiming the following: 1.    We failed to meet the 21 days deadline set by the court. 2.    He received a response on the 7th April which is only a week ago. 3.    He admitted that he has the two version of our submission. He claimed that they were collected by colleague of his from the court’s Clark while he was in court. 4.    He said that this case has taken too long and the defendant just messing them about and keeping changing their plea.   At that time the judge announced that he does not have the two documents in the case file. He only has the medical certificate.  Then he turned to me to ask me for explanation. a)    I said that we met the deadline set by the court and submitted the required response.  Also I explained the issue with two documents. b)    I confirmed that we have received a confirmation form the court on their receipt of  my submission emails. c)    I stated that Intrum lawyer’s claim is incorrect that we failed to meet the deadline, and pointed out that he has our two documents in his possession which he obtained from the court.   Then the judge started asking Intrum lawyer on the content of the two documents, which is bizarre not to ask the author of the documents.   Intrum Lawyer stated that the two documents almost identical. He then started pointing out the negative sides in the documents such as our change of the 50% settlement.  He continued claiming that we are changing our defence without following the certain set procedure, which it seemed to confuse the judge. The lawyer  continued to ridicule the document in general without being specific.  At the end the judge turned to me  to response.   I said that the court must see the document as it is important to the case.  It is not correct to ask the lawyer to a brief the court on our document as he has been selective in what to read.  The judge came in and said that he asked the lawyer for a general summery of its content.   I continued that the full claim case is fundamentally flawed, and I continued to list why: 1.    The nature of the relation between the original creditor and defendant does not constitute the need for Financial Agreement between the two parties.  The claimant stated in their case that the defendant was in breach of a Financial Agreement. Where is this agreement? 2.    There is no Default Notice that the claimant stated in their submission there was a Default  Notice. 3.    Also has the original creditor served a notice of assignment on the defendant? 4.    The other fundamental issue is the question of the nature of the sum claimed!. .  .  .  . . .   At that time the judge stopped me asked me if I was asking for the other side to present these documents.   I responded:  Intrum are experienced organisation in this type of business.  They know very well the importance of these documents to the case, why they have not been  incorporated them in their case submission , . .  my answer Yes  . . . our missing response document put the claimant to Strict Proof to present these documents to the court.   The lawyer then announced that the Default Note was included in their submission and, he continued to quote a reference number, then he retracted his claim, which is I had a sense that he felt he has gone too far in his BS***t.   However, the judge spend most of session faltering and does not know what to say.  At the end he decided to go for another CMD. But then the funny part he asked the Claimant lawyer to send him the two missing documents.   I feel more positive now on the case but I would appreciate your views and comments.   Thank you
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1004 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh well. looks like Hearts will get relegated this week :sad:

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh well. looks like Hearts will get relegated this week :sad:

 

v hibs next.

either way, hopefully they won't go into admin?;

'Supporters group Foundation of Hearts is waiting for permission from the administrators representing the failed Lithuanian businesses of former owner Vladimir Romanov to sign off on a £2.5m rescue package that will see businesswoman Ann Budge take control. ' bbc

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
I wouldn't at all be surprised if Mourinho, Simeone or Ancelotti make a move for suarez in the next season or two.

 

 

he's 27 now, so wld prob have to be this summer if they're going to go for it.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

arse now out of the title race after home draw v swansea? will they even make top 4, timspurs and everton closing in?

city now favs after comfortable away win at manure, moyes still under pressure?

lfc v black cats tonight. win, and we're still in it. :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If moyes cant even qualify for europe, then he may as well say goodbye to the UTD job.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could all be for nothing, plenty of football to be played, did you catch Barkley's goal?

 

nice win for lfc :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet he wishes he was back at Everton, the Everton supporters wouldn't want him back.:wink:

 

Friendlies have always been meaningless, these days you can make as many changes as you like so whats the point?

 

:) wld he even qualify for that!? :)

 

'Nations League' coming, no more friendlies! http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26762899

Link to post
Share on other sites
It could all be for nothing, plenty of football to be played, did you catch Barkley's goal?

 

never for nothing :) 7 wins on the trot, we're still in it, and it goes to securing a champs league spot if nowt else. :)

didn't see his goal, have now. not bad, but seen better :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything can happen, but your in the running, it's mad, I've been concentrating at the bottom of the table.:-)

 

never for nothing :) 7 wins on the trot, we're still in it, and it goes to securing a champs league spot if nowt else. :)

didn't see his goal, have now. not bad, but seen better :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
....

Friendlies have always been meaningless, these days you can make as many changes as you like so whats the point?

 

 

it could turn out to be a good thing.

but, one thing for friendlies is that it gives the coach a chance to try out non regulars etc in the senior setup outside of competition.

what does everyone think?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rest my case 'friendlies' killed the conversation.

 

it could turn out to be a good thing.

but, one thing for friendlies is that it gives the coach a chance to try out non regulars etc in the senior setup outside of competition.

what does everyone think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) worth a try :)

 

when there's a friendly the pundits keep saying; try out the youngsters, give the back up keeper a run, try a different formation, etc. whilst at the same time saying they're pointless otherwise. suppose now not even a poss as points will be at stake. :)

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

suppose the nations league will be a good thing for england, we'll have a good chance of winning an international competition :) plus other home nations might have a better chance of qualifying for the euros :)

 

chelski lose to palace! manure come from behind to win, where was that plane banner! city one up atm v arse. lfc v timspurs tomorrow, pressure now on lfc...can they handle it?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least we actually have an interesting season for a change, and not one dominated by 2 teams all through it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until tomorrow....

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
.., pressure now on lfc...can they handle it?

 

 

yes we can :) resounding comfortable win for lfc :) jumpers for goal posts.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, Hearts 2 Hibs O 16/1 with Willie Hill :)

 

Oh and 5/2 the Jambos to win :)

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...