Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you please show the back of the first PCN you received round about 17th January. Was there a WS included or just the PE v Beavis case?
    • Hey have filed a defence at 4pm today the day before I could request a judgement.  I thought it was last Friday but it was infact tomorrow they would have ran out of time 
    • Hello All,   My query is about the Service charge. I am leaseholder of a 3 bed flat in a purpose build block in London (Westminster) our service charge used to reflect the maintenance of the building and overall look and feel. But now not only service charge goes up every year but quality of service like general maintenance gone down. For example lifts keep breaking down, building needs refurb, walls are dirty, my windows are so old that in winter no matter how much heating you put on room still feel cold.    additionally they keep adding major works charges to service charge with this year being £1917 in addition to £1890 service charge. Don’t mind paying only if I see improvement in the block but we have only seen steady decline over many years now. So today I called them (city of Westminster) saying I don’t want to pay and cannot pay so high charges where there’s no evident results.    I came here to find if anyone has been successful in negotiations on regards to service charges complain or any advice regarding this. Charges are too for what we get    Thanks in advance  
    • this is going to be really simplistic, but have they started by talking to senior management now the bad apple has gone?
    • Hi everyone  . . .  Just an update   The CMD was this morning.  It started with cheap  manoeuvrability  by Intrum’s lawyer, but let me give you quick summery background:   The judge issued an order to us to submit evidence supporting our case such as call for witnesses or ask the court to order the original creditor to some action.  We were giving 21 days for the submission.  In my simple calculation without, allowing time to post, the final date was to be 10 March 2021, with post time 2 days later.   On the 10th March, and to be on the safe side, I send to the court the response version giving to me by DX100UK.   Then on 12th March, I send to the court the version giving to me by Andy, asking the court to replace the first document with the second  one.   On 7th of April I send Intrum lawyer the document 2 as it is our official response.   ON the 12th April I send the court the medical certificate for my niece asking to be viewed exclusively by the court.   At the start of the CMD the Judge ask Intrum lawyer to start.  So he started by claiming the following: 1.    We failed to meet the 21 days deadline set by the court. 2.    He received a response on the 7th April which is only a week ago. 3.    He admitted that he has the two version of our submission. He claimed that they were collected by colleague of his from the court’s Clark while he was in court. 4.    He said that this case has taken too long and the defendant just messing them about and keeping changing their plea.   At that time the judge announced that he does not have the two documents in the case file. He only has the medical certificate.  Then he turned to me to ask me for explanation. a)    I said that we met the deadline set by the court and submitted the required response.  Also I explained the issue with two documents. b)    I confirmed that we have received a confirmation form the court on their receipt of  my submission emails. c)    I stated that Intrum lawyer’s claim is incorrect that we failed to meet the deadline, and pointed out that he has our two documents in his possession which he obtained from the court.   Then the judge started asking Intrum lawyer on the content of the two documents, which is bizarre not to ask the author of the documents.   Intrum Lawyer stated that the two documents almost identical. He then started pointing out the negative sides in the documents such as our change of the 50% settlement.  He continued claiming that we are changing our defence without following the certain set procedure, which it seemed to confuse the judge. The lawyer  continued to ridicule the document in general without being specific.  At the end the judge turned to me  to response.   I said that the court must see the document as it is important to the case.  It is not correct to ask the lawyer to a brief the court on our document as he has been selective in what to read.  The judge came in and said that he asked the lawyer for a general summery of its content.   I continued that the full claim case is fundamentally flawed, and I continued to list why: 1.    The nature of the relation between the original creditor and defendant does not constitute the need for Financial Agreement between the two parties.  The claimant stated in their case that the defendant was in breach of a Financial Agreement. Where is this agreement? 2.    There is no Default Notice that the claimant stated in their submission there was a Default  Notice. 3.    Also has the original creditor served a notice of assignment on the defendant? 4.    The other fundamental issue is the question of the nature of the sum claimed!. .  .  .  . . .   At that time the judge stopped me asked me if I was asking for the other side to present these documents.   I responded:  Intrum are experienced organisation in this type of business.  They know very well the importance of these documents to the case, why they have not been  incorporated them in their case submission , . .  my answer Yes  . . . our missing response document put the claimant to Strict Proof to present these documents to the court.   The lawyer then announced that the Default Note was included in their submission and, he continued to quote a reference number, then he retracted his claim, which is I had a sense that he felt he has gone too far in his BS***t.   However, the judge spend most of session faltering and does not know what to say.  At the end he decided to go for another CMD. But then the funny part he asked the Claimant lawyer to send him the two missing documents.   I feel more positive now on the case but I would appreciate your views and comments.   Thank you
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1004 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

maroondevo52

Re: Football

 

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by
sweenstar
viewpost-right.png

Keep right on,

 

it's the start of a song we sing
smile.gif

 

 

 

Thanks for that, just watched a clip on youtube, good stuff
smile.png

 

Great do you think you could be converted to a Birmingham city fan ? We need all the supporters we can find
:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

There problems started a long time ago when they were in the Prem. The ex-directors have a lot to answer for.

 

and in the midst of a takeover, and winding up petition after their bid failed!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently they are still paying for Mark Viduka who retired 4 years ago.

 

Concur,

 

They spent so much money on players who just wanted to ride along on the wave. Leeds are a good club with a good history, I'm sure they will bounce back.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Apparently they are still paying for Mark Viduka who retired 4 years ago.

 

Mark Viduka yeh he really screwed them for every penny he could, There is no loyalty with players it's all about the money, I don't fall for all this kissing the badge business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

81 crosses, a Prem record = two goals. Hopefully were (Fulham) on an upward curve, showing a bit more fight.

 

I still can't believe what went on at Old Trafford.

 

Plan A. Cross the ball

Plan B. Cross the ball more

Plan C. Keep crossing the ball.

Link to post
Share on other sites

81 :!: sounds like a moyes gameplay! why with ball players such as mata, shrek, rvp etc!

apparently fulham threw in some youngsters following the poor display midweek?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, give the team some legs, we've been losing matches in the last 30 minutes in recent matches. Today we've just allowed Man Utd to recycle the ball, we kicked it anywhere, they kept mounting attacks. Hopefully our new striker - Mitroglou will do a great job.

The Cup really isn't a priority when your at the basement. I think Man Utd should have slowed their play down, they looked like they were in a rush:wink:

 

81 :!: sounds like a moyes gameplay! why with ball players such as mata, shrek, rvp etc!

apparently fulham threw in some youngsters following the poor display midweek?

Link to post
Share on other sites

typical moyes, maybe seems he thinks he's still at everton!

tbh, can't see fulham staying up. wrong manager choice for a prem league relegation fight imo. same with west brom and cardiff who also changed their manager. palace for eg, pulis, the right one for a scrap.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we will stay up, 2007-2008 we stayed up on goal difference, we've got rid of our luxury players, Berbatov, Ruiz and Taarabt. Liverpool at home on Wednesday, they are on fire at the moment. We need a plan, we need the points.

 

typical moyes, maybe seems he thinks he's still at everton!

tbh, can't see fulham staying up. wrong manager choice for a prem league relegation fight imo. same with west brom and cardiff. palace for eg, pulis, the right one for a scrap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as i've 'condemned' them to relegation, fulham will prob get a result v lfc on wednesday (jinx)! :) . we couldn't beat w brom away after thrashing everton at home, we're too inconsistent atm! hence why not title contenders.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Raith Rovers knocked Hibs out of the Scottish Cup :)

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites
I see Raith Rovers knocked Hibs out of the Scottish Cup :)

 

and league two Albion through to the quarters, first time in 80 yrs :) rangers next.

celtic out, now wide open. :)

 

hearts fans group to take ownership?

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
as i've 'condemned' them to relegation, fulham will prob get a result v lfc on wednesday (jinx)! :) . we couldn't beat w brom away after thrashing everton at home, we're too inconsistent atm! hence why not title contenders.

 

i didn't jinx us! lfc won, just :) some poor defending again though nearly cost us (is Toure still 'working' for city :) ). need to get our proper centre backs back asap, why didn't llori get a chance instead of going out on loan, he's an international with a good rep, and must be better than toure atm? even kelly at cb!

 

bore draw arse v manure, timspurs won at geordieland, chelski coudn't beat the baggies either......

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool were lucky. It was a silly tackle that cost us a point. The guys worked hard. Disappointed with the second and third goals conceded. For the second, one of our failings this season, closing down. The third was a 'giveaway'. He was going nowhere.

 

i didn't jinx us! lfc won, just :) some poor defending again though nearly cost us (is Toure still 'working' for city :) ). need to get our proper centre backs back asap, why didn't llori get a chance instead of going out on loan, he's an international with a good rep, and must be better than traore atm? even kelly at cb!

 

bore draw arse v manure, timpurs won at geordieland, chelski coudn't beat the baggies either......

Link to post
Share on other sites
Liverpool were lucky. It was a silly tackle that cost us a point. The guys worked hard. Disappointed with the second and third goals conceded. For the second, one of our failings this season, closing down. The third was a 'giveaway'. He was going nowhere.

 

would say fulham were 'lucky' to get their 2 goals from our glaring defensive errors? our goals were well worked, including the pen which although was a poor tackle :) didn't see the full 90, but by the reports it was a good game.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wenger v Mourinho mind games, funny :) W saying M comments are re fear of failure, M saying W a 'specialist' in failure! Pelligrini as well. Brents 'chihuahua’s'. :) let the games begin.

 

Fulham change manager again!

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fa cup; reverse wins, city beat chelski, arse beat lfc (though it should've been an lfc win but for sturridges missed chances and webbs usual performance :) ps could excuse a 'fine line' error, but such a glaring one! maybe his mind was on his next lecture :) )

brighton v hull tonight

champs league back on this week, knockout stages. if arse play like they have last two weeks, they'll be out.

shrek up for a new contract! not long after threatening to leave to get some more pay, and now some more. 300k/week being mooted? is he worth it?

.....

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dare I say, Sturridge was looking for it, he was going no where, a silly tackle. We were ahead twice. The goals we conceded were poor.

 

would say fulham were 'lucky' to get their 2 goals from our glaring defensive errors? our goals were well worked, including the pen which although was a poor tackle :) didn't see the full 90, but by the reports it was a good game.
Link to post
Share on other sites

For us it's 2007-2008 season all over again. Stayed up on goal difference. The new manager is a harsh task master, I'm not keen, but who knows.

 

Wenger v Mourinho mind games, funny :) W saying M comments are re fear of failure, M saying W a 'specialist' in failure! Pelligrini as well. Brents 'chihuahua’s'. :) let the games begin.

 

Fulham change manager again!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...