Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,   My friend was being bullied by a manager who kept saying that anonymous people were complaining about her, she is asian and the minority where she works, she raised concerns in her meeting that she felt it had something to do with her race and gets treated differently to the rest of her colleagues due to off the cuff comments previously made and was told by her manager that as a minority she has to prove herself more as a minority in life and thats unfortunately the way it is. Following on from this they’re were more anonymous complaints all revolving around her attitude when speaking to the anonymous individual(s), she then had a meeting with hr initiated by her managwe and expressed her concerns, no outcome was given as the hr person said it was informal and a week later she has been told that she is being made redundant, my question is there were no specific incidents mentioned and my friend is still confused exactly how this came about but suspects it’s her manager who has taken a disliking to her, is this lawful?
    • Thanks for advice . I have spoken to the ICO , and their opinion is that there “may “ be cause for complaint . In the first instance I should write to the hospital (CEO)citing GDPR, giving them 30 days to respond . If the response is not to my satisfaction , then back to the ICO to raise a formal complaint . The ICO also suggested copying in the GMC with the complaint , I feel at present that is one step too far , perhaps I will sit on that until I get a reply from the hospital.
    • Thanks ethel and stu007   Yes, we had the kerb double dropped so me and my partner can park off the road. Before , just had one, and idiot would park in middle of properties so couldn't fit two cars on road outside. Has been issued a good 3 or 4 PCNs for obstructing since done. Its the back of the car, sometimes as far as a wheel but has a long boot/bumper which hangs over, so its not fully over. Recently seems to be as far as can without getting a ticket.   CCTV - shall read up thanks. Oh also, when I say 5 CCTV, that is 4 on property (100% out of boundary) and 1 in car which is lit up all night.   Does this count as harassment? The initial start of this thread, about 6 threatening letters asking me to pay for vehicle damage or court (nothing came of this) The constant parking annoyance (going on a couple of years) The loud music, witnessed by Env heath officer but not quite loud enough for notice, so letters sent. Paint 'accidentally' spilled on road outside my property (because was parked over our drive at time) Letters about rubbish outside my own garage at rear of properties and the 4 screws attaching bamboo to his fence. Then reported me for fly tipping, didnt go anywhere as officer agreed wasn't causing an issue. I have since sorted the screws and bamboo and idiots fence is literally falling apart. Concreting over 1/4 of my grass in rear lane whilst doing own part. Stupid things like having a BBQ and the parasol sticking way over the fence into my garden. All very subtle and annoying things to cause issues, without quite breaking the law.   The council are aware and claim powerless as own properties and the police pretty much are not interested.   What can be done?    Cheers   E!              
    • Hi, any thoughts on this would be greatful, will send tomorrow i think.. letter_15th_oct.pdf
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2492 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I was wondering about the best way to go about this, as i didnt receive any thing from courts or council,or a letter from the bailiffs to say they would be coming.

 

Any help or advice would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks jennie

 

If you did not receive anything before a bailiff turned up then you need to appeal the PCN, a form TE7 and TE9. This is called an "Out of Time Statutory Declaration".

 

If a bailiff levies on goods or a vehicle after sunset the levy is void and any fees paid can be reclaimed under Throssell v Leeds City Council [1993] Leeds county court, case no.9350977

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TB Law....

 

Sorry but I must correct you.

 

In the case of Michael Throssell and Leeds City Council the District Judge most certainly DID NOT rule that a levy after sunset was void.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you did not receive anything before a bailiff turned up then you need to appeal the PCN, a form TE7 and TE9. This is called an "Out of Time Statutory Declaration".

 

If a bailiff levies on goods or a vehicle after sunset the levy is void and any fees paid can be reclaimed under Throssell v Leeds City Council [1993] Leeds county court, case no.9350977

Where does it state that in Statute? Or are you saying is it inferred by Common Law?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry but I must correct you.

 

In the case of Michael Throssell and Leeds City Council the District Judge most certainly DID NOT rule that a levy after sunset was void.

 

 

You are absolutely right tomtubby, sorry it took me a while to get court records for this case.

 

After reading it, I am curious why you say the plaintiff's first name is "Michael". Can you point the source of your information?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are absolutely right tomtubby, sorry it took me a while to get court records for this case.

 

After reading it, I am curious why you say the plaintiff's first name is "Michael". Can you point the source of your information?

 

 

It matters not if he was called Tom ,Dick or Harry the most important factor was the Judgment, dont you think?

 

WD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The integrity of the source is crucially important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What ? ? ? You have the Court record.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The plaintiffs name is different from the one in post #20.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are absolutely right tomtubby, sorry it took me a while to get court records for this case.

 

After reading it, I am curious why you say the plaintiff's first name is "Michael". Can you point the source of your information?

 

 

His name is Michael Throssell and this is the name that appears on the full Judgment ( which I have a copy of). I also corresponded with him a while ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The plaintiffs name is different from the one in post #20.

 

I need to go to spec savers as #post 20 gives no name....you appear to have a fixation to calling Tomtubby into question? strangley enough I keep asking myself why do you remind of a former cagger happy contrails aka nintendo aka fork it aka aka aka ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I need to go to spec savers as #post 20 gives no name....you appear to have a fixation to calling Tomtubby into question? strangley enough I keep asking myself why do you remind of a former cagger happy contrails aka nintendo aka fork it aka aka aka ?

 

 

snap that makes 2 of us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
snap that makes 2 of us

Now you come to mention it, the tone of the posts is reminiscent of those of Fork-it


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I need to go to spec savers as #post 20 gives no name....you appear to have a fixation to calling Tomtubby into question? strangley enough I keep asking myself why do you remind of a former cagger happy contrails aka nintendo aka fork it aka aka aka ?

Personally I think TB Law is a first year college year student trying to show how clever they are, but is failing miserably! Why they keep questioning some one like Tomtubby who is very experienced in these matters is beyond belief.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only asked for the source. 10 posts later the source remains elusive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TB Law. I am really confused here. Last evening at 21.24 you stated in your post "can you point to the source of your information". Less that 2 hours later I posted back to state the following:

 

His name is Michael Throssell and this is the name that appears on the full Judgment ( which I have a copy of). I also corresponded with him a while ago.

 

For you to say this morning that the "source" still remains elusive is frankly baffling.

 

This particular case is so very well known and as far as I know, the full Judgment is readily available to all CAB staff and other advice agencies. In fact, at the time of this case, Mike Throssell was a part time student and working at an advice agency !!

 

I have been given permission by Mike Throssell to copy the Judgment to anyone who is interested in reading it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from the original poster (who would not be interested in the judgment) everbody else has a PM facility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 posts later still no source.

You surely have the PM facilty TB?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately not, it ceased functioning after I reported to an admin about somebody's intellectual property being hosted on a CAG server without the authors permission.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TB Law. Have you not read my post number 33 ?

 

I am worried as to the reason WHY you are asking me to give you the SOURCE and also your comment that the "integrity of the source is crucially important".

 

This is a very common judgment and one that is readily available. I have had a copy for probably 5 years or so. John Kruse refers to this case very often in quite a few of his books.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive heard of the name but I am not familar with his work.

 

I made a very simple request but I am perplexed why so much rebuke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2492 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...