Jump to content


style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2404 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I was recently asked by a cagger who to contact at Sherforce (Shergroup) with a complaint...I suggesested they contacted Chris Badger as he is given to be their Complaints Officer..

 

Imagine my surprise when the cagger reported back he was no longer working at Sherforce!!!!!

 

A little digging brings forward he is thought to now be working at the Sheriffs Office, I will only offer MHO that would be a move for the best for him and I wish him every success but, that is not what concerns me and prompts me to write this post.

 

Sherforce list three HCEO's appointed by the Lord Chancellor to carry out command to serve High Court Writs, they are of course permitted to 'sub contract' the work but as each of those HCEO's are commanded as an individual to carry out their appointment then surely they must be seen to be at the least active, with their finger on the button so to speak?

 

Claire Sandbrook no longer resides in the UK and cannot therefore uphold the duties of her 'appointment'

 

David Asker is by all accounts,when reading Sherforces' own website, not active as a HCEO and his 'position' within the company lies in I.T. therefore he does not uphold the duties of his 'appointment'

 

Christopher Badger, if the rumour to him having taken his 'appointment' elsewhere is confirmed, must therefore have notified the Lord Chancellor's Ofiice to no longer being a recognised HCEO for Sherforce

 

Is it time for the Lord Chancellors Office to take a closer look at their appointment register and remove those who are no longer active and merely a name on that register.???

 

 

WD

Edited by wonkeydonkey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Claire Sandbrook no longer resides in the UK and cannot therefore uphold the duties of her 'appointment'

 

I bet that is no comfort for the likes of James Goacher who had his Bridlington fish & chip shop ransacked by her firm in a case of mistaken identity, and two years on, she has not even sent a bunch of flowers with a 'sorry' note, let alone repaid him his loss of earnings and replacement fish & chip shop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WD...I though that CB was working there until the end of Jan. I will make some enquiries.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I bet that is no comfort for the likes of James Goacher who had his Bridlington fish & chip shop ransacked by her firm in a case of mistaken identity, and two years on, she has not even sent a bunch of flowers with a 'sorry' note, let alone repaid him his loss of earnings and replacement fish & chip shop.

 

I doubt it will be of comfort to anyone who has been impacted by Sherforce's incompetence, myself included but, the post permits the asking of the questions raised on the evidence available, to be directed to the right quarter.

 

WD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WD...I though that CB was working there until the end of Jan. I will make some enquiries.....

 

Thanks TT ..must confess I found the original conversation hard to follow due to there being a language barrier?

 

WD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I doubt it will be of comfort to anyone who has been impacted by Sherforce's incompetence, myself included but, the post permits the asking of the questions raised on the evidence available, to be directed to the right quarter.

 

WD

 

What do you want to achieve and who do you want to direct it to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I doubt it will be of comfort to anyone who has been impacted by Sherforce's incompetence, myself included but, the post permits the asking of the questions raised on the evidence available, to be directed to the right quarter.

 

WD

 

HCEO's could be included in a bailiff film also


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noticed that Shergroup's accounts are overdue at Companies House, their trade sector is shown as Solicitors so you would have thought they would have respect for the Companies Act.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Noticed that Shergroup's accounts are overdue at Companies House, their trade sector is shown as Solicitors so you would have thought they would have respect for the Companies Act.

 

Now let me see, they did something similar last year.....


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moneymonkey.....I have just checked on the Companies House website and you are in indeed correct. The accounts for SHERGROUP Ltd were due to be filed by the end of February 2013. Last year was dreadful as quite a few of the companies in the group were actually STRUCK OFF the register at Companies House for failing to file accounts on time. A notice was given in the accounts that a new firm of accountants had been employed by Shergroup.

 

Interesting times.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moneymonkey.....I have just checked on the Companies House website and you are in indeed correct. The accounts for SHERGROUP Ltd were due to be filed by the end of February 2013. Last year was dreadful as quite a few of the companies in the group were actually STRUCK OFF the register at Companies House for failing to file accounts on time. A notice was given in the accounts that a new firm of accountants had been employed by Shergroup.

 

Interesting times.......

 

Is Shergroup CEO still pursuing the American Dream, of emulating Dog The Bounty Hunter, and importing his methods to UK enforcement?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...