Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefits Cash Card


Gay_guy1986
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4089 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you condoning benefit cheats? It seems that way from your post. I did state as a last resort with people who are benefit scroungers, i.e. druggies, alcoholics and people who play the system. It seems that the minister wants to target this category and not the genuine people who do need benefits.

 

Huh? Since when has how people spend their benefit been a marker for being a benefit cheat? People are eligible for benefits due to circumstances and according to the regulations. Are drug addicts and alcoholics, benefit cheats now? And how does spending money on alcohol or cigarettes or gambling indicate someone is playing the system? These are all addictive behaviours.

 

Do I think that more help should be available to people with addictions - yes. Would a cash card system help these people? I'm not so sure - I think it would just increase crime, which is counterproductive and costly. I also don't condone parents who neglect their children in any way, but I don't think that infringing on everyone's right to privacy in order to stop parents spending inappropriately is acceptable. Maybe it would be more appropriate to increase funding to social services to help them deal with problem parents - but of course this isn't acceptable to Tories because it doesn't involve facilitating the profits of private companies.

 

Also the minister states the category he wants to target, but he wants to do this by applying the cash card to all non disabled on benefits. The Tories are two faced - small government for the rich and big government for the poor.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the Benefits cash card was going to be part of the 'Social Banking' thing. a4e was on about introducing it a while ago. They and the government believed that people on lower incomes couldn't manage their finances. Pot, Kettle, Black springs to mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the minister states the category he wants to target, but he wants to do this by applying the cash card to all non disabled on benefits. The Tories are two faced - small government for the rich and big government for the poor.

The Labour government was no different and I doubt if any other party that we vote in will be any different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Labour government was no different and I doubt if any other party that we vote in will be any different.

 

As they've previously said: 'All in it together' and they certainly are.

 

The only one's who won't end up on the system are those who fit the 'ViP' status. Mp's, Members of the Royal Household and certain celebrities, who have a dedicated person to deal with their benefit(s) claim and nothing is put onto the Computer System. This is for security purposes. :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

She classes herself as an Anarcho-Libertarian and believes taxation to be legalised theft.

 

As far right as can get then.

 

These ideas where basically freedom is removed from spending is like treating people as children, me someone who spends their money only on essentials, I dont smoke, drink and I dont have premium tv channels, it would be wrong to treat me like that because a few spend on non essentials.

 

But that aside, we dangerously moving to an era where people are accepting anyone on benefits doesnt have a right to enjoyment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far right as can get then.

 

These ideas where basically freedom is removed from spending is like treating people as children, me someone who spends their money only on essentials, I dont smoke, drink and I dont have premium tv channels, it would be wrong to treat me like that because a few spend on non essentials.

 

But that aside, we dangerously moving to an era where people are accepting anyone on benefits doesnt have a right to enjoyment.

 

More like no work= no human rights to decide your own life style, this government is doing its utmost best to promote all the financial troubles of this country are down to the scroungers on bemnefits be they ill, disabled or out of work! Anything to deflect from their bedmates who are the real cause of our financial problems the large companies evading paying their taxes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get £71 a week, so my total income is £284 a month (my rent goes direct to the landlord, and my council tax is paid direct to them so that is not classed as 'income' much as the Daily Mail likes to think.

 

My outgoings are

 

Food £15 in supermarket - £10 on market stalls for fruit and veg so £140 a month

Sundries £5-10 depending on whether I need washing powder or floor cleaner.

TV Licence £12 a month

Phone (cant get out of contract til September - have had it reduced from £35 to £26)

Broadband £26 a month including tv and home phone

Travelcard £10 a month - travel from my area to central London is £11.50 and will go up in New Year

Electric £40 a month

Water I have a meter £10 a month).

 

What little I do have left doesn't go on cigarettes, it goes on getting me to a voluntary job, presents for the family and friends, and one fancy coffee a month at knitting group meeting.

 

I am not living in the lap of luxury, my TV (yes a 42 inch flat screen, NOT plasma - was brought when I was working, as was my 2 year old laptop...)

 

For me a card would mean I would not be able to shop at market stalls as they only take cash.

 

I also forsee the likes of Brighthouse and others coming up with a scheme whereby 'clients' hand their cards over and are given cash, with of course a £25 - £25 fee deducted from the total benefit - all because some plank of an MP doesn't live in the 'real' world.

 

This idea should be rolled out to people who have never worked and are not natives of this country first - then see the shambles it causes.

 

I've worked since I was 16 and this is the first long term period of unemployment I have experienced - so why should I be targetted with this group of 'scroungers'.

Edited by sillygirl1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the Benefits cash card was going to be part of the 'Social Banking' thing. a4e was on about introducing it a while ago. They and the government believed that people on lower incomes couldn't manage their finances. Pot, Kettle, Black springs to mind.

 

yeah apparently those who work dont have enough to live on so need tax breaks, but if you unemployed with less money than those who work its not that you dont have enough money its that you cant manage your money.

 

genius.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More like no work= no human rights to decide your own life style, this government is doing its utmost best to promote all the financial troubles of this country are down to the scroungers on bemnefits be they ill, disabled or out of work! Anything to deflect from their bedmates who are the real cause of our financial problems the large companies evading paying their taxes!

 

Also that the problems are largely exaggerated such as the deficit been some sort of urgent crisis when its far from it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I said on another thread about this, there was recently a debate on a BBC breakfast show about whether the spending of those on benefits should be restricted. They weren't discussing a card, but the use of food vouchers a la the system in the United States. There was one guy on that who was adamant that claimants spent all of their money on alcohol, cigarettes and of all things, pornography. :!:

 

It's laughable. When we relieve our JSA, after I've paid our rent top up and gas and electric, I have around £80 left for 3 people, to last 2 weeks. This has to cover food, transport (including the cost of attending interviews up to 45 minutes away, which is anywhere between £6.60 and £10.40 a time), and the cost of our phone and broadband (which is as you have already stated, essential. I couldn't apply for jobs without them, because the public PC facilities in this town are so poor. There's only two PC's in the JCP, and the one's in the library cost £2 for 30 minutes). With all due respect, anyone who thinks we're out piddling tax payers money up against the wall is out of their mind. Over the last twelve weeks, I've had to chose between attending out of town interviews and food. Beer and fags don't even come into the equation.

 

It's counter productive, forcing people off benefits and into low paid work. They're still going to be paying through the nose in HB and WTC, unless they somehow plan on doing something about the cost of renting privately, energy bills and transport costs.

 

Why dont they get a claimant on one of these shows to say it how it is, always some idiot who is rich enough to get air time or an MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I am sure the drinks industry will be over the moon with this one.

Yep this could mean less tory party donations so I cant see this happening myself.

 

Funny enough that may be what stops this idea.

 

The tories do listen to business's and if enough pubs etc. start moaning then that may sway them.

 

What many people forget is typically benefit money is 100% spent, veyr little of it is saved. Meaning wherever its spent unless on the black economy or overseas its going back into the economy anyway.

 

However I genuinly think its a very low % of people claiming spending their benefit on trash.

 

Also would ESA come under disability benefit and not be included or udner unemployment and included, I think the latter.

 

This convincngly passed its first hearing in the house of commons, I didnt hear any no's shouted out from labour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry

 

But a few people on CAG really do need to get a life and stop worrying about something that's not going to Happen and believing everything they read !

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pie in the sky thinking. The card would have to act like a debit card and be acceptable online. In the unlikely event it could be programmable to interpret the individual items purchased (as opposed to the total as is the current state of affairs), there would be many sites popping up to get around the problem. You buy a packet of cigarettes and it appears on your bill as a pair of socks.

 

I think they will restrict the retailers to places like tesco, another backhander to those companies diverting welfare money to them.

 

which of course removes the ability to shop around for the claimant such as using ebay or charity shops for cheap 2nd hand clothes.

Edited by worried33
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry

 

But a few people on CAG really do need to get a life and stop worrying about something that's not going to Happen and believing everything they read !

 

we shall see, but I do not trust this government as far as I can throw them! Wish I could find a deep hole they could all be shoved down!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry

 

But a few people on CAG really do need to get a life and stop worrying about something that's not going to Happen and believing everything they read !

 

All I can is, never say never - with this lot.

If they can make life hell they will.

I am not overly worrying, but it is part of the trend with them isn't it.

Out of work - on benefits, then suffer seems to be their view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone remember green shield stamps?

For those that are too young, these were the original nectar points, you got varying amounts of stamps depending on how much was spent on shopping and a book to stick them in, they were meant to be redeemed at specific stores for things like irons, or kettles and so forth.

My grandmother used to save up full books and give them to me to run down to the local second hand furniture shop where the proprietor would give you 10 bob on the pound.

Nothings changed much in 50 years.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone remember green shield stamps?

 

I use to love licking them,especially the big one's :!:

 

No, this is definitely going to happen. This is way more worrying than the Universal Job Match.

 

Worrying again I see :lol::lol::lol::lol:

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the article I read in the paper (note not seen anything in work) was that the cards would be for essential which included internet but excluded booze and fags. Can't recall it all sorry as the paper went out for recycling.

As I said though nothing has been posted at work so I would just take it as the usual speculation of something they would like to do but haven't got past the lightbulb moment yet.

With the removal of Crisis Loans though it is looking as though that is going full circle to many years ago where vouchers were issued instead of cash specifically for teh required item.

Wonder what the local authorities will put in place of CL's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the article I read in the paper (note not seen anything in work) was that the cards would be for essential which included internet but excluded booze and fags. Can't recall it all sorry as the paper went out for recycling.

As I said though nothing has been posted at work so I would just take it as the usual speculation of something they would like to do but haven't got past the lightbulb moment yet.

 

The team(s) currently trying (& failing) to sort Universal Credit out, have been asked to see if its feasible.

That's as far as its got at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tbh I'm usually racing around like a blue @rsed fly to find much on the works intranet but we are emailed important information directly by the JCP manager usually firwarded from the District Management of anything that is pending to be intoduced. so I'm not saying yes or no it will happen just that I haven't read anything at work as yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...