Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
    • the process for attaining a charging order is the same no matter what it results in. interim first then latter they can go for a full charging order. at ICO stage its recorded the same on your deeds until a full CO is applied for and granted. however, as in your case, it resulted in simply a restriction k which cannot be converted into a full charging order so the entry remains stating ICO. smart cookies on your side IMHO now ...hope you succeed. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

won esa tribunal but...


gazzer12005
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone this is my first post so here goes!!!!

 

Today I successfully won at my tribunal for esa!!!!!!! And I represented myself!!! GO ME!!! I went from 0 - 18 points !!!!!

 

My decision notice reads like this: 1. The appeal is allowed

2. The decision made on the 14th August 2012 is set aside

3. ( My Name) is entitled to Employment and Support Allowance("ESA") with the work-related activity component

4. This is because in applying the Work Capability Assessment 18 points were scored from the activities and descriptors in schedule 2 of the

ESA Regulations 2008 made up as follows:

 

1© 9 points

2(b) 9 points

 

5. No schedule 3 descriptor applied. Regulation 35 does not apply.

There are no exceptional circumstances.

6. The Tribunal recommends that the Department reassesses the appellant within 12 months

The Tribunal received cogent oral evidence in relation to physical factors

 

Question1. Will my payments / payment dates change??

 

Question2. Do esa owe me any back pay?? ( I currently receive £111 per week for me and my wife)

 

Question3. Do I need to continue to supply medical certificates (sick note) from my doctor to them??

 

Question4. Is it worth me applying for DLA???

 

Question5. Does this mean I am in the support group???

 

Hope someone can help I am very confused, ELATED at winning my Tribunal, but still very confused!!!!! Hope someone can help!! Thanx Gazzer!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your payment date shouldn't change. I believe that's all done by your national insurance number. After you're put into a group, there is no reason to carry on sending in sick notes. The DWP / tribunal have accepted that you have limited capacity for work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, well done on winning :-).

 

I won mine on 4th dec and backpay will be in bank tomorrow. My payment day will stay the same. Your same position as me as we as a couple got £111 a week. I now get the £111 plus £21.50 a week as top up as we were IB esa and an extra £34.50 a week for support element you will get same as us im sure but minus £5 because your in WRAG group. Your backpay is from date of medical with dreaded ATOS. Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am right :-). I applied on 27th feb, medical on 29th may then appeal on 4th dec. letter today stated i would get backpay from 29th may (92 days) until 4th December then money goes up to £333 a fortnight. You can call jobcentre say on thurs and ask if they have tribunal decision as its normally sent straight away and they can confirm on the phone you will get backpay. They may not tell you amount till they calculate it but thats what i done.

 

Whats your wife's situation though because u get same as us and we are IB ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

With us i claimed CB esa then hubby lost his job so he had no income. They put him on my claim and it changed my esa to ib esa which gave us the £111 a week. My rep said to me if i was on CB esa i would of been getting more than the £111 a week so im wondering why thats what your getting. It may be right and I've maybe picked her up wrong but just wondered incase you were entitled to anymore money. Maybe someone else can clarify this incase im wrong.

 

I actually thought i was on CB esa and found out it had been changed to ib while talking to tax credit people lol. Anyway your due at least 900 plus anyway :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been a great day if what you say comes to fruition it will take alot of pressure off us thanks for the advice i will ring them on thursday and see what they say. thanks for taking the time to look at my situation good luck to you and your family..... DOWN WITH ATOSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are more than welcome. If you can check back in and let us know.

 

P.s i actually emailed my mp so i believe thats why my money was put in sooner. He had money approved within 48 hours when i had called sameday and told 5-6 weeks so something else worth remembering ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all toooooooooo confusing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:noidea:

 

 

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?114-How-do-I-post-my-story-on-the-Consumer-Action-Group-forum

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...