Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Thousands of Chinese companies are making synthetic opioids and shipping them around the world.View the full article
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Government are Losing Their War


Lady Lou
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I do not think it is a war that any of us can afford to lose. However how we do it i am not sure. We all know people who get benefits that in a fair society they should not be getting. But how you stop that without hurting the genuine i do not know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather that a few who are working the system get through the net, than those who are vulnerable and in need get choked by the net - which is what is happening now.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not think it is a war that any of us can afford to lose. However how we do it i am not sure. We all know people who get benefits that in a fair society they should not be getting. But how you stop that without hurting the genuine i do not know.

 

Hi have you seen the latest benefit figures, £20 billon unclaimed in benefits owed. Tax evasion, £500 billion dodged. What planet do yo live on? Do you vote ConDems?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have you seen the latest benefit figures, £20 billon unclaimed in benefits owed. Tax evasion, £500 billion dodged. What planet do yo live on? Do you vote ConDems?

 

Yeah, look - let's be civil to each other, 'k?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know about the government losing.

 

I went to their poll and it has 2 very cleverly worded questions to manipulate views and answers.

 

Do you think it’s fair that people can claim more in benefits than the average family earns through going to work?

Do you think benefits should be increased more than wages?

 

The questions alone are misleading, because the tax cut on personal allowance alone will boost wages more than inflation, secondly they ignoring that the typical benefit claimant is living on a lot less than the typical full time worker.

 

The question about people getting more on benefits than those going to work, is very misleading, there is a few situations where a claimant can get more than someone working but this is typically associated with someone who has children because its child related benefits that are generous, yet that part of welfare has barely been touched.

 

Of course my final point been that they keep going on about fairness, when if life was fair there would be a job available for everyone at equal pay and noone would fall ill.

 

Also that anyone filling in this poll can not say anything meaningful as they have limited any comments to an extremely short amount that is barely enough to say one sentence. Clearly they only interested in the yes/no counts on misleading questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think it’s fair that people can claim more in benefits than the average family earns through going to work?

 

Two different situations are being compared here. The person who claims more in benefits might be a carer. They've kept it quiet that carers will face the benefit cap. I certainly have no issue with a carer (who may work 24/7 and have no breaks) claiming more than £26k in benefits per year. They save the country billions each year anyway.

 

Do you think benefits should be increased more than wages?

 

But they're not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that disabled or very sick individuals can claim more in benefits than some skivvy on a part time low wage job tells me that wages need to rise. The unjustice is that the managers and execitives are having huge pay increases and not that ill and disabled are being given a fair amount to live on in some comfort.

But these condems have decided to shine the torch on us scroungers, blaming us for low wages and it seems the deficit. Turning the workers against us, devide and rule. The unions used to be the demon and now its our turn.

Sadly though the british sheeple beleive the millionairs who have been placed in government. These sock puppets in the theatre of westminster serve their masters, democracy is dead. Welcome to plutocracy my friends.

 

I agree the fix is to push up wages not to decrease sickness payments.

 

I dont know how many sick people get more than min wage income tho, I certianly dont. Maybe possible if someone got full DLA and IB/ESA together? But of course someone can still get full DLA whilst working as well since DLA is not an unemployment benefit so shouldnt count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that disabled or very sick individuals can claim more in benefits than some skivvy on a part time low wage job tells me that wages need to rise.

 

You're comparing two different situations. A disabled person generally incurs extra costs; therefore, needs extra money to meet these costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its arguable the tory leaders are deliberatly inciting unrest between different parts of society, the question is that a crime someone can be arrested for.

 

eg. if I manipulated 2 people to fight each other in the street is that a crime? because I see it as the same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have you seen the latest benefit figures, £20 billon unclaimed in benefits owed. Tax evasion, £500 billion dodged. What planet do yo live on? Do you vote ConDems?

Which ever party was in government i would be saying stop the cheats be that benefits or tax. The benefits system is broken,so is the tax system. Everyone blames the Tories for everything but frankly labour did a pretty good job of screwing it up. I am on benefits and i hate the way i had to act to get the right benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well according to the governments own figures less than 0.5% of benefit claimants were cheating the system.

 

Yep, and let's be clear - this isn't really about cheats. Even if it were possible to eliminate all fraud and error overnight, the amount is too small to be significant. The aim of current government rhetoric is to blur, in the public eye, the line between cheats and honest claimants.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i didn't know that figure but from long experience it does surprise me. In my time i have known a few cheats or people who have managed to abuse the system. As i said i am on ESA and hand on heart i do not know if i could cope with work until i try it. Therefore after xmas i have an appointment to discuss permitted work.

There is,and has been,a long held perception that there are too many career benefit claimants and young single mothers who think a baby gets them a house.

I say use a bit of self control and contraception. :)

As a raving homo that's hardly an option for me

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...