Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fig. 5: Account Status Codes for Current Accounts Explained 0 Your account is in credit; your account is not overdrawn; you are managing your account within the terms of your agreement. 1 Agreed repayments are one to two months behind; your overdraft balance has been greater than your overdraft limit for one to two months; cheques, direct debits and standing orders may have been bounced to keep the account in order. 2 Agreed repayments are two to three months behind; your overdraft balance has been greater than your overdraft limit for two to three months; cheques, direct debits and standing orders may have been bounced for a second month to keep the account in order. 3 Agreed repayments are three or more months behind; your overdraft balance has been greater than your overdraft limit for two to three months; cheques, direct debits and standing orders may have been bounced for a third month to keep the account in order. 4-6 Agreed repayments are more than three months behind but you have agreed new repayments with the lender to bring the account in order. 8 Your overdraft balance has been greater than your overdraft limit for more than three months and you have not agreed new repayments to bring the account in order. The lender has decided that you have broken the terms of your agreement and has told you that your account is now in‘default’; the lender has closed your account. U Your account has just been opened; your account is more than three months old, has a zero balance and has not been used in the last month.
    • Para 4, ICO technical  guidance on the filing  of defaults at CRAs   4 It is an accepted industry standard to record only serious ‘defaults’ with credit reference agencies. The term ‘default’ on credit reference files is used to refer to the situation when the relationship between the lender and borrower has broken down. A record showing a series of payments as six months in arrears when this does not reflect the real payment history should not be used as an equivalent of a default. Where a code is used to describe a default or variation in payment, it should always be accompanied by an explanation in plain and intelligible terms which informs the reader of its meaning. 
    • I read this morning that ‘a cabinet minister’ has complained that over 70s are being contacted before all over 80s have been vaccinated.  It’s beyond all sense to me that a vaccination programme should be slowed or halted for any reason except safety.  I accept there’s a pecking order and we’d like to adhere to some notion of fairness where possible but this is a pure numbers game surely.
    • Even if a county court case is issued against you and you loose if you pay within 28 days it dont go on your credit file and also its cheaper to go to court becasue the £60 is never allowed so it would be £200 if you loose £230 if you dont go to court.
    • The government is being scrutinised over trade deals with countries with poor human rights records? View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

what happens at a work program interview with your jobcentre advisor?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2952 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

i've just signed in to my emails and discovered a company had invited me to attend interview last friday, it's not a vancancy i was matched to by my advisor but i did apply for it off the directgov website. will the jobcentre find out and if so will i get sanctioned?

 

please help, advice needed :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites
I would email the company and say you have only just found the email and you would be very grateful if they could rearrange. Maybe give some guff about limited internet access and include a phone number.

 

i've just emailed them saying something simular, it wasn't a matched vacancy but will the jobcentre find out and what will happen if they do?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tough one which i can't answer. Personally i wouldn't tell them unless you get another interview

 

i'm not going to tell them and i'm hopeing the company won't either *fingers crossed* :fear:

Link to post
Share on other sites
i'm not going to tell them and i'm hopeing the company won't either *fingers crossed* :fear:

 

The Jobseeker Direct website is available to everyone, whether on benefits or not. If you didn't tell the Jobcentre you applied, and the company doesn't know you're on JSA, it seems highly unlikely that there would be a problem.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The Jobseeker Direct website is available to everyone, whether on benefits or not. If you didn't tell the Jobcentre you applied, and the company doesn't know you're on JSA, it seems highly unlikely that there would be a problem.

 

well i put the position in my jobseekers log but i didn't tell them verbally i had applied for it, also i wasn't matched to the vacancy by my adviser and the company as far as i'm aware don't know i'm on jobseekers so i guess it's a waiting game to see if the jobcentre say anything about it :undecided:

Link to post
Share on other sites
well i put the position in my jobseekers log but i didn't tell them verbally i had applied for it, also i wasn't matched to the vacancy by my adviser and the company as far as i'm aware don't know i'm on jobseekers so i guess it's a waiting game to see if the jobcentre say anything about it :undecided:

 

If it was just in your JSA diary, I think you'll be fine.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
is it only vacancies you were matched to by your adviser that your at risk of sanction from or all vancancies you apply from there?

 

Up until last week or so, JCP had no way to know whether you had applied for any given vacancy if you weren't matched to it and didn't tell them about it. Even if you mentioned it in your fortnightly diary, it's unlikely anyone at JCP would have the time or inclination to check up on you - they see so many people, and there aren't enough staff to keep such close tabs on everyone who claims JSA.

 

Universal Jobmatch may change that to some extent. I'm not sure how, exactly, as it seems the system is still not fully implemented. But that's only just started.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

you will go in a room with other people like you,and the advisor will explain all you have to do ,then you will see your adviser once a fortnight,and show them your job diary,normally takes 10 mins,

sometimes they ask you to do a job search on their computers,thats it really.

Link to post
Share on other sites
you will go in a room with other people like you,and the advisor will explain all you have to do ,then you will see your adviser once a fortnight,and show them your job diary,normally takes 10 mins,

sometimes they ask you to do a job search on their computers,thats it really.

 

so it won't be a one to one interview with my advisor? i haven't been refered anywhere yet by the jobcentre.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only involvement the JCP will have with regards to your claim when you are part of the work program is your fortnightly signing unless you are not able to show you have been actively seeking or available as per your JSAg and then you will be referred to a JCP adviser to gather full details regarding a DMA referral.

Work Program are your adviser in place of the JCP adviser iygwim?

Link to post
Share on other sites
the only involvement the JCP will have with regards to your claim when you are part of the work program is your fortnightly signing unless you are not able to show you have been actively seeking or available as per your JSAg and then you will be referred to a JCP adviser to gather full details regarding a DMA referral.

Work Program are your adviser in place of the JCP adviser iygwim?

 

so because an appointment for me has been made with my advisor does this mean im been sanctioned or will she just explain everything about the work programme to me? :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the meeting that you are attending is at the JCP Office, and the purpose of the meeting is to assign you to the Work Programme, then the aim of the session (which will last about 30 minutes) is to provide information, develop an Action Plan with you (where you specify a Job Objective), and when they contact the Work Programme Provider with your details.

 

You should then get a telephone call within a few days from the WP Provider, and invite you to a meeting. Which Provider ? Refer to the following link

www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/cpa-preferred-bidders.pdf

 

At the first Work Programme meeting, the WP provider will ask roughly the same questions which JCP Staff asked you at the allocation meeting, and will then try to persuade you to sign a Data Protection Waiver. It is not necessary for you to sign the document - and even if they threaten you with a sanction, there is no legal obligation for you to sign.

 

so because an appointment for me has been made with my advisor does this mean im been sanctioned or will she just explain everything about the work programme to me? :???:

It is important to realise that your only obligation is to Job Centre Plus, and to the Job Seekers Agreement, which will remain active insofar as you remain unemployed. Although Job Centre Plus may require you to attend the Work Programme until such time as they tell you otherwise, as soon as you get a job and sign off, then you can forget about them and need not contact them for any reason.

Edited by RebeccaPidgeon
Additional Information Submitted
Link to post
Share on other sites
If the meeting that you are attending is at the JCP Office, and the purpose of the meeting is to assign you to the Work Programme, then the aim of the session (which will last about 30 minutes) is to provide information, develop an Action Plan with you (where you specify a Job Objective), and when they contact the Work Programme Provider with your details.

 

You should then get a telephone call within a few days from the WP Provider, and invite you to a meeting. Which Provider ? Refer to the following link

www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/cpa-preferred-bidders.pdf

 

At the first Work Programme meeting, the WP provider will ask roughly the same questions which JCP Staff asked you at the allocation meeting, and will then try to persuade you to sign a Data Protection Waiver. It is not necessary for you to sign the document - and even if they threaten you with a sanction, there is no legal obligation for you to sign.

 

 

It is important to realise that your only obligation is to Job Centre Plus, and to the Job Seekers Agreement, which will remain active insofar as you remain unemployed. Although Job Centre Plus may require you to attend the Work Programme until such time as they tell you otherwise, as soon as you get a job and sign off, then you can forget about them and need not contact them for any reason.

 

thanks for the information, is it possible that i won't get my first appointment at the WP provider until the new year?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Most of the WP providers are finishing on Friday until the new year so yes it is likely that you won't hear from them until then :)

 

are igneus and seetec closing from friday untill the new year? they are the two who provide the WP in my area.

Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks for the information, is it possible that i won't get my first appointment at the WP provider until the new year?

You may get the call inviting you to the interview within a few days of the meeting at JCP, and likely that it will be scheduled after New Year.

 

I suggest that you review the information contained within http://consent.me.uk/, understand your rights, start a Twitter account, and follow @boycottworkfare and @refuted - that way you will get a live feed of significant updates. Also, if you need urgent help, you can either post a message her, or short message via Twitter.

 

It is important to realise that the Welfare To Work Staff that you meet are not Consultants (a baloneous term), are broadly on a par with the Clerks that you meet at Job Centre Plus, and are supposed to treat you and other candidates with respect.

Edited by RebeccaPidgeon
Grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

i missed a call from ingeus this morning, i called them back and they said they will call me back this afternoon at some point..could it be possible i'll have an appointment with them tommorow or are they just booking for the new year? :/

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...