Jump to content


Please help! My defence struck out without any evidence from bank


kobylka
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Brief background: I was a director of limited company and applied for business overdraft with Lloyds. They sent a pack of forms to fill. I was specific not to fill the personal guarantee document.

 

They provided overdraft. In 18 months the company went into luquidation. Bank went after me for PG. i took them to financial ombudsman - this went on for over 2 years, with ombudsman simply not reading any of my argument and agreeing with everything the bank said.

 

Earlier this year bank yook me to court, producing a strangely looking photocopy of personal guarantee and nit producing any executed business overdraft credit agreements.

 

I did cpr 31.14 request copying to court - which was ignored. 2 months later, i sent another letter to Lloyds remiding about the request and saying that i would apply for strike out of their claim if they do not respond.

 

Within days , i got a request registered with court for strike out of my defence! I had a hearing now - the judge ( who was a recorder and not a full judge) said he believes every word of the bank and finds it unnecessary to see any original evidence from the bank!

 

So the bank now got a summary judgement against me without any evidence.

 

How can i get this set aside? Is this even legal for a judge to simply side with the bank without any evidence? Please help!

Edited by kobylka
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Koby and welcome to CAG

 

Did you acknowledge service of the summons and submit a defence?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - it was a short notice hearing for struke-out, and they required a statement which i submitted by email and post and had a postal receipt.

 

Hearing was listed for 10.30 - but when i arrived at 10.05, it already started. The judge told that i did nit submit any statement - to which I replied that i did and gave him a printed version. He did not look and asked to present my argument. As i started talking and mentioned there were no copies of originsl agreements, he went to say that he has no doubt the debr existed. I said that i did not sign the personal guarantee document and would like to see the original, to which judge replued that he sees no need for that and would just take a word of the bank that they had the original!

 

What argument can i use to set the summary judgement aside and get a full hearing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we could just take a step back and refer to my first post did you Acknowledge Service via MCOL and did you submit a particularised defence?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...