Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bwlegal SD help new here and have no idea what to do


msbay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Ok please bear with me , new here and in a bit of a state.

 

Hubby had SD delivered by hand tonight.

 

Two debts detailed

 

phone 38 odd

 

credit card 3700 ish

 

I spoke to people at door how refused to give names or where from ( darklate at night) hubby went and they handed him SD

 

I called BW legal on hubbys behalf ( he gave permission for me to speak tothem) and told them debt in dispute, had been for some time we don’t believe weowe it cca request made to other DCA none responded ( I didn’t chase them attime - no proof now as ages ago) said if we did owe then we would pay but stronglybelieved we didn’t owe it.

 

They asked for telephone number I refused stating didn’t want hounding callsand wanted to deal with in writing.

 

Told him wanted CCA , he said needed it in writing and pound fee

 

He stated action would be stopped as debt in dispute

 

Can some one tell me what to do know.

 

How do I know action stopped? Or shoulda still do the setaside thing , what if they don’t allow it will they take thehouse?

 

Is this debt SB, from when does the 6 years apply? We had letters from otherDCA but never responded apart from very close to the beginning when we askedfor CCA.

 

Hope this makes sense, bit rattled at moment as we have 4 little ones and iam worried we might lose our home which is mortgaged with equity . We both ownhome in both names , debt only in hubbys name.

 

Can someone please help me to follow the correct process, as Im worried Ive made it worse by talking to them, not named person on SD as she was not there .

 

thank you , I have tried reading threads but I think where Im a bit upsetjust getting more confused

 

thank you in advance. Sorry so many questions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just have a look through CAG and you will see many BW Legal/Lowells statutory demands. Yes your hubby will need to do the set asides on the basis of the disputes that you have had.

 

As you don't have the paperwork for the disputes/CCA requests, you will need to SAR the relevant companies to get them to provide the details they have on file. You should also SAR the original creditors to find out the information you need. The 6 years runs from the last date of payment or written admission to owing the debts.

 

You have 18 day to get the set aside into your nearest County Court that handles bankruptcy and hopefully you can get some information before then. If not, you complete the set aside forms with the information you know. As long as there are issues for a court to consider, then you will get it set aside or a hearing to decide on it. If there is a hearing, it will give you more time to get hold of the information you.

 

Worth checking credit record to what is on there.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Example thread here.

 

There are many many others. You just have to fight it and mostly people are able to get the SD set aside. BW Legal don't always appear to have the information and are using the SD as debt collection tool without always seemingly wanting to follow through. ( They are not supposed to do this)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much so can i please clarify

even though they have said they have stopped the action should i still apply to the courts for it to be set aside.

the debt was assigned 2008 to lowell stated in SD. we have not abmited debt ect for over six years is this SB who do i send letter to lowell /egg/bw legal

should i send CCA/SB/sar and in the case of phone debt ( this is totally unknown) a letter saying unknown debt cann i send all these letters , or would they cancel each other out

who do i send the CCA to Bw legal or lowell.

thank you for advise guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

even though they have said they have stopped the action should i still apply to the courts for it to be set asidelink3.gif

 

Absolutely, defgeinately yes. Do not trust these people to put this on hold . This happens so many times, they lie to people and get a claim by default.

 

we have not abmited debt ect for over six years

 

The statute barred process begins from your last payment. This is why a SAR is important, as they would need to provide a statement showing yoy made a payment within the last 6 years. You say you did a CCA request, just be careful, it is not uncommon for DCA's to use the £1 payment to credit the account.

 

who do i send the CCA to Bw legal or lowell.

 

If you have already done a CCA request in the past, I'm not sure you need to send it again.Instead use the correct template letter from the library informing them that the account is in dispute. I also think that at this stage the best form of defence is attack. Keep track of all the time and expense involved in defending this and threaten to counter sue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you thank you thank you

what should i say to courts to get it set aside?

and who should i send SAR to

would you suggest sending both

SAR and SB letter first as im sure we didnt pay when we requested CCA as we never have paid for this. or been given a letter requesting a fee.

WHo gets SB letter, thank you so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent a CCA req to Lowells before ? When did you send this ? If this was quite a while ago and Lowells did not respond, I would suggest doing this again. I think you said that you don't have proof of the previous CCA req. If this is the case, as you are being threatened with bankruptcy, I would consider making an SAR to Lowell for all information on their files. I would not normally advise to SAR a DCA, but in this case with your lack of paperwork, it may be advisable.

 

I would also SAR the original creditors to obtain all the information on their files. Ask for copies of all statements in particular and default notice, so you can see the details.

 

As has been said, you MUST do the set aside. You have 18 days from the date the SD was served to do this. There are many threads on here, one I linked to previously, which will give you an idea of what forms need to be used and what to put on them. Have a read through other threads and then post back for help, when you come to attempt to put the forms together.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some great advice above.

 

If you have not made any payments towards the alleged debt for 6 years nor acknowledged the debt in writing then it will be statute barred, and you can bet that despite Lowells and BWLegal knowing this they are hoping that you will curl up in a ball and give in. You need forms 6.4 (set aside) and form 6.5 (witness statement) you can find them both here - http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/about-us/forms/england-and-wales

 

This is a guide as to how to fill in 6.4 -

 

How to fill in Form 6.4

 

For (a) fill in your name and address

 

The section that states attend before the Registrar leave blank. This will get filled in by the court.

 

For (b)

on the hearing of an application by (b) (insert your name)

 

An application for an order that the statutory demand dated (insert date on the SD that you received from (CREDITORS NAME) be set asidelink3.gif

 

For ©

The grounds on which the applicant claims to be entitled to the order are set out in the witness statement of the applicant sworn on (insert the date that you hand the forms into the court).

 

For (d)

The names and addresses of the persons upon whom this application should be served are:

(d) (insert name and address of CREDITOR/SOLICITOR)

 

For (e)

The applicant’s address for service is: (e) (insert your name and address)

Cross out where it states (Solicitor for the) and just leave the word Applicant and sign and date the form.

 

----------------------

 

As to filling out the 6.5 (witness statement) then you will find a good thread here.... - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?309388-capquest-statutory-demand

 

You have 18 days (from when the demand came into your hands) in which to submit the 6.4 and 6.5 (along with any accompanying paperwork (including your CCA request)) to your nearest court that handles bankruptcies / insolvencies (not all county courts do) and you should check with your local county court.

 

Once you have taken the completed 6.4 and 6.4 in to the court, (along with the original stat demand) (make sure you take at least 2 copies of each peice of paperwork) Then you should expect a court date in one to two months time. If the debt is statute barred then it is a complete defence without considering anything else. You should also submit your costs to the court 24 hours before the hearing (but you have plenty of time to do that) refer to this thread (for the costs) - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?327997-Statutory-Demand-from-Hamptons-Legal-WON-STAT-DEMAND-DISMISSED/page2&highlight=hamptons

 

Don't be bullied and be prepared to fight your corner....(which in your own case should be easy)

 

What you MUST also do is drop an email to the OFT about this as it is likely they know the debt is statute barred....

 

If you need any help then please shout....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...