Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I have not. I will probably do that
    • Based on ECP's previous, what will definitely happen is this. They will send more idiotic letters. After they will send a Letter of Claim, and it is essential that your brother replies at this point to this to show them he would be big trouble in court. Next it is highly likely (but not certain) that they will crawl back under their stone and that will be the end of the matter. The slight worry is that if they do do court it will seem a likely story to a judge that your brother has no connection to the ticket, when it was him who appealed and replied to the Letter of Claim.  Indeed I think it would seem the lot of you were playing games with ECP and with the court by getting unconnected people involved and then later deny they were involved. So be aware there is that slight risk. You talked about "a mess" in your first post, and you weren't wrong. Someone hires a car and gets a ticket.  There is an appeal.  Who appeals, the hirer?  No, the hirer's mate's son.  Obvious! There is an approach for help to a consumer website.  By the hirer?  No, by the hirer's mate's son's brother! This is so damn silly and totally avoidable. Anyway, it seems the decision has been made for your brother to carry the can so whatever consequences will ensue will ensue. 
    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI , recently i was made aware of a CCJ that had been passed to HCEO for enforcement.

The CCJ was obtained when i was recovering from illness and I failed to file a defence.

 

The debt was from EON for about £450 however the balance on my account was only around £360.

 

HCEO have been in touch and i explained my situation then sent an I & E form to them offering £20 / month as this was all i could afford. I setup a standing order for this amount.

After about 2 weeks i received a letter saying that the client did not accept £80 of expenditure on my form and decided i need to pay £100 / month.

Next HCEO were at the door again saying that i owed £80 on my arrangement and needed to pay immediately.

This was not possible and the Officer left.

 

The letters i get from HCEO have no court numbers on them but are made to look like court letter, the only ref number is a HIG number with the Claim number blank.

Since my first offer my situation (financial) has worstened.

 

Can anyone advise me of how to deal with this as the HCEO is wanting an urgent phone call from me over the £80.

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt was £450 including costs at the point a ccj was awarded I fail to see how eon have managed to hike it up to the £600 required to transfer it to the High Court? Can I ask if you have seen this alleged Writ or are you being duped into thinking the matter was being addressed by HCEO by use of a clever letter heading? who is the alleged HCE company?

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,the letter just says High Court Enforcement at the top.Address is Marine House,Colwyn Bay, LL29 8PH. I have never seen the writ however the person who called produced a sheriff's badge. They also say that the owed is now £1199.67.The Letter goes on to say Removal of your assets will now take place with or without my presence at the property if necessary and without further notice. I will have to check the actual figures that were claimed by Eon but it was higher than my closing balance before costs were addded.

 

Nicurro

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much is the HCEO asking for in total? Debt plus his fees =?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , i have aqttached the letter from them about refusing the offer of £20 / month also the last letter from the person who called at my property.

On the original claim form they claimed £584.92 before solicitors costs even though my closing balance was £409.00.

 

Thanks

Nicurro

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain with all the questions.

 

The 2 attachments above, can youconvert them to PDF files - JPG's are too small to read? Make sure you obliterate all personal info though.

Do you have EON's Particulars of Claim, this is the when the original claim was made?

Excluding the HCEO fees are you in a position to pay the initial debt?

The amount you say they are disputing on your I&E. is it possible you can tell us what that is - if you think I'm being too nosy then I apologise?

Has the HCEO gained access to your home?

Has the HCEO seized any goods outside?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original debt is below the £600 transfer threshold and you have an HCEO concealing evidence of a writ.

 

I would say you have a nupty trying it on because the debt you describe is not compatible with the criteria laid down rule 30.3 of the civil procedure rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I see it your most important task is to stay execution of the writ, to do this you need to download forms N244 & N245 from HMCT website and make an application (N244) to stay the writ pending decision to a variation order(N245) If you are on a low income or certain benefits you can claim fee remission to the costs of these applications using form ex160.

 

If your local Court is listed as a District Registry you can take both applications in person to them and explain to the counter staff the Stay is seen to be urgent due to the HCE threats to remove your goods. Quite often their is a 'spare' Judge available who can hear your application there and then, if the Court is busy you might be asked to wait/return later/await a reply by phone or even post. In the meantime you should send a copy of your application to a stay to HCE they in turn SHOULD step back until a decision is made but if they want to be awkward they can still attempt to enforce until the stay is granted.

 

If you need help with the forms please don't hesitate to ask.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , the attached letters explain the reason for not accepting my offer , since this offer my income has reduced and the two things they don't agree with can be removed still leaving me in a position to pay £20 / month.

The claim was earlier this year when i was taking morphine for my illness , i thought i had filed a defence but i hadn't , they got judgement by default. I heared nothing from the court , no letter no call and thought that no judgement had been made until HCE knocked on my door.

I am unable to pay the initial debt at this time.

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that information.

 

As I see things you cannot really apply for Set Aside but should apply for a Variation Order as Wonkeydonkey has said. The form for this involves submitting I&E and although it may be submitted to the Claimant for their approval - they will probably reject it & cite what you have given previously. Don't worry about that as they are probably incapable of thinking peoples circumstances change - up or down - and the Court can direct how much you pay. Again if it is too much you simply apply again. I suspect I could hazard a guess as to who the solicitors may be as I have seen this scenario previously.

 

As for the HCEO there are 2 possibilities here. Firstly following what you have said there may be chance you could be classed as vulnerable according to the National Standards for Enforcement Agents to which HCE Group should agreed to adhere too. Of course the chances are the Enforcement Officer attending is instead focusing on his fees. Secondly as Wonkeydonkey says apply for a Stay of Execution which if granted halts all further enforcement action & charges. Your grounds for doing so may include:

i - pending determination of a Variation Order

ii - you cannot afford the fees charged because of your financial circumstances - again provide I&E

iii - because of your illness/condition you cannot deal with this in a satisfactory manner

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again , I am still being pursued by HCEO , they called again and put a notice of seizure on my mobility car , I explained that he could not do this as it was not mine to which he replied '' I can do what I want ''. I since contacted their office who told me they would check the DVLA database , if it is not mine they will remove the notice.

Does the statement '' I can do what I want'' breach the code of practice as it implies that he has more powers than he actually has , also it comes across as a threat which I felt very intimidated by.

also I asked for a breakdown of fees and it looks as if the list still has charges for the seizure notice on it, along with £240 for enforcement costs( re-attendance fees ) for the visit when he left the seizure notice.

I spoke to the head office about what he said and they agreed he should not be saying this and to write a complaint to them.

 

any thoughts please and help with a complaint letter would be appreciated.

 

I have also complained to EON's Director of Customer service about the original debt am mount and the HCEO fees and attitude to see if they can help.

 

Nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

At a quick guess it will be your debt + their over inflated costs that got it to the magical £600 + they need to involve a HCEO.

 

The HCEOs costs cannot be added to the debt. If the figures are correct it will either be the creditors costs detailed in an agreement (some add legal fees I believe) or the court costs that have pushed it over the £600 threshold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The HCEOs costs cannot be added to the debt. If the figures are correct it will either be the creditors costs detailed in an agreement (some add legal fees I believe) or the court costs that have pushed it over the £600 threshold.

 

If you read it I never said that - it is the original debt + any costs the creditor has come up with.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes u have but have been waiting for national debt line to send my income / expenditure forms , the list has the original debt amount then about another 8 items that have been added onto this given a full total of around £1400.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the debt has now more than doubled due to costs. How does this help the debtor, discharge their debt? As to Motability car, and HCEO saying he can do as he wants, if the levy is not removed, complaint to EON and if you live in Clwyd West, inform David Jones MP, he may well be interested as would Darren Millar AM no doubt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way to prevent the HCEO chasing you is to apply for a Stay of Execution, even if you apply for any other application enforcement can & will continue. As for your car a clue the HCEO should have noticed is that of your RFL which should have told him it was issued via Motability Fleet, no excuse at all for missing that.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do as PT suggests as the Stay will put the HCEO on hold, once granted, you could then also complain to MP and AM, regarding levy on Motability car etc, if you are on certain benefits or low income the fees for the Stay can be remitted.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...