Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because there was still £69 owing, I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle. However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account ......... has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

"BUDGET" People insurance cock up


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5665 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Quick story.

 

One month ago I had a car accident, just a few days after taking out new insurance.

Condition of insurance is that there is a thatcham cat 1 alarm system fitted.

There is such an alarm firtted, copy of certificate sent off.

Letter arrives today, they have cancelled the insurance because there is not an alarm fitted.

I ring up to find out why.

There is nothing on the certificate saying that its category one, and the alarm model isnt listed with thatcham.

I have rung cobra (maker of said alarm) it is listed, there is even a thatcham number for it.

Thatcham says that it isnt.

It turns out that the alarm comes under 2 names, and on the book it gives it under both.

I gave my insurance company the number for cobra.

 

This has taken about 5 hours on the phone.

 

 

OK, I get home, and take a closer look at my documents (had no access to them at work) and indeed the alarm is a thatcham one.

 

So, I ring up the insurance.

They have now agreed this is a thatcham alarm.

As the policy has now been cancelled, it cannot be reinstated, I have to take out a new policy.

The quote was now £150 more than it was before, because now I am showing an accident.

I told them that there was no way I was paying that as it was a cock up from them. They agreed to stick to the old quote, so now I am insured again.

 

Now, this is the big problem.

The policy has a claim, therefore no refund is due to the old policy. This leaves me £400 out of pocket!

 

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR:-x

 

So, I cant get any further with the phone line, they wont pass me on to anybody else.

They cock up, I am £400 out of pocket.

 

I really dont need this!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car has to have cat 1 as a condition of the insurance.

I provided that evedence.

They cocked up big time, couldnt read the certificate properly, thought it wasnt valid.

They cancel policy.

I dont get refund of rest of money because of claim a few weeks ago.

So, I have had one month of cover for £400, as I have to take out a new policy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like a letter to the ombudsman to me

HTH (Hope This Helps) RDM2006

 

THE FORCE (OF CAG) IS WITH YOU

;)

 

We've Helped You To Claim - Now Help Us Remain

A live Site - Make a Donation

 

All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

 

However, if you have found any advice you have been given helpful.

Why not show your gratitude And

Click the * on the post you found helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't think this is right at all - I reside in Peterborough and Budget's Head Office is about a 5 minute drive away. To be honest Budget does not have a good reputation when it comes to insurance and indeed as an employer. They are alway's loosing staff and have regular recruitment drives. I have spoken to several friends who used to work for the company and they have quoted how bad they really are! If I were you I would phone them again and tell them you want to make a complaint and that you will be escalating the matter to the Ombudsman. Your complaint should be acknowledged and dealt with within 5 days. If they can't deal with it within 5 days they ultimately have 8 weeks to deal with it. Once you receive a final response on behalf of the Chief Executive you can take it further to the FOS if you are still unhappy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like a letter to the ombudsman to me
Ditto.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurance companies have only recently come under the umbrella of the FSA, so they're all a bit nervous about it. I reckon if you make a big enough fuss to the various regulators you'll be able to get it sorted.

 

I have to say, that if this were me, I would have them straight up to the small claims court for £400 - very safe in the knowledge that they'll settle straight away. One tactic I've used very successfully on many occassions is to send tham and LBA with completed copy of the court documents included. Tell them that you'll be submitting it on a specific date if they don't cough up. Big companies often rely on the fact that many people threaten to sue them, but then don't. The fact that you'll be including the completed claim forms means that they'll know that all you have to do is send them to the court. Just a suggestion. :)

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well after that guess what I got in the mail this morning? A letter from Budget. Having cancelled my insurance with them verbally and in writing when my car 'died' two months ago and having cancelled the direct debit with the bank advising Budget of what I'd done and getting confirmation from the bank that this (cancellation) had been done, they're still chasing direct debits and me. I'm going to write to them and send an invoice for my costs to date in dealing with them. Is there a thread on this forum that deals with dodgy insurance companies ? Apart from Budget....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have let this go for a while as I have had no time to deal with it, they promised to answer my complaint in 8 weeks, this passed long ago into the dim past. As if to remind me, I had a phone call from Budget recently offering me breakdown cover, which I did not accept. I need international cover; they could not even give me a price for this cover, so I emphatically refused it, as it did not cover my needs, and I wouldn't give them another penny in any case them being so utterly crap. Today I received a letter from them complaining that they could not take a payment, when I rang up it was concerning RAC cover that I had not asked for. To top it all they have said they are going to cancel my policy because I have not paid for cover I did not want or ask for!!!

ARGHHHH!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, if this is any help, I dont think it will get as far as the FSA. The FSA, as soon as they get your papers will forward them on to the insurer, advising they have so many days to issue you with a final notification letter (This is a letter stating this is our final stance on the issue).

 

They are so plainly in the wrong, that SURELY someone with an understanding of insurance, or even an ounce of common sense, will see that they cannot hide behind the argument "The computer wont let me do that" and pay up....

 

Good Luck!

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well.

Updated story.

My complaint went in months ago, they are allowed 8 weeks to reply to it.

After 11 weeks had passed, I sent in a complaint to the FSA.

More trouble.

I was offered RAC cover, which I declined.

Lo and behold! A letter advising me that unless I paid £60 quid extra, I would have my poicy stopped once again.

Why the extra money, as I had paid the premium in full up front?

Some fool had put down I had accepted the offer of RAC, and now I had been covered, I was to pay for it.

I point blank refused the cover. It did not cover my needs as I at times drive abroad, the cover did not include this. Besides Budget are fools, why would I get tied up with them any more than I am already?

Now they would not believe me, they had to listen to the recorded phone call.

Yesterday I had a call.... yes, I had refused the cover, oh how sorry we are.

And also, more good news, a credit of 11 months of insurance shows up in my account.

So, another claim bites the dust. What a pain it has been!

 

They seem to be very keen to end policies early.

I wonder why.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A litigant to breed from, that's what you are my friend. :D

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let other Budget sufferers out there know - there is light at the end of the tunnel if you just keep at it : After seven months of hassle I have finally got the answer I wanted.

 

Budget really cocked up my insurance - they accepted my no claims then they didn't, then they did, then they changed their minds and so on. I ended up with no less than eight policy documents all different with all different amounts. Call centre staff said one thing then in the post arrived something totally different. In desperation in one telephone call with Budget I said I had a good mind to cancel my policy. The response? Go ahead and see if we care. As it happened my car 'died' and I was forced to cancel my policy - Budget being unable to place a hold on my insurance until I found a replacement vehicle. Call centre staff accepted my cancellation over the 'phone and said I owed nothing. Then I got a bill for cancellation fees and recently threats of court action. I wrote to Budget saying I would only deal in writing and explaining my case and what did they do? Telephone me and then write asking me to telephone them. In desperation I wrote back at the beginning of January with my invoice for charges relating to my costs in dealing with their inefficiency. The result? An apologetic letter today saying that they can't consider my invoice but they have deleted all monies they have showing on the account. I haven't made any money but it's one less to worry about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

i insured with budget they cocked up instalment plan so ended up paying full amount they wouldent accept no claims proof i resent same docs they then accepted them

the policy ended last month i told them not to renew

they renewed any way and are now demanding £123.00 for cancalling insurance i had allready renewed elseware the policy had only run for 4 days when returned it to them the letter is threatening dca or court action

they are oviously morons

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...