Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In the very first claim thread it mentions contacting the claimant is encouraged by the court etc. I was thinking about contacting them and asking about a Tomlin order to put an end to all this, at least I'd be able to stop worrying and maybe get some sleep (currently 4.52am) 😴
    • Hi I'm looking for a bit of help to deal with a claim form from Hoist/ Cohen referencing an old Capital One account please. I have filled out the details below as requested and submitted an acknowledgement of service intending to defend.   In 2007 I sent a SAR and requested a copy of the original CCA from Cap One on this account.    In 2014 Lowells sent a claim form for the same account. I have a copy of a notice of allocation to the small claims track hearing and a copy of the front sheet of ack of service with intent to defend but I have no recollection of its outcome and there are no CCJs on my credit file.    Name of the Claimant Hoist Finance UK Holdings 2 Ltd   Date of issue – 5/11/2019   Date of issue 05/11/19 + 19 days = 24/11/2019 + 14 days to submit defence = 7/12/2019 (33 days in total)   Particulars of Claim This claim is for the sum of £294 arising from the Defendants breach of a regulated consumer credit agreement referenced Under no XXXXX. The defendant has failed to remedy the breach in accordance with a default notice issued pursuant to ss. 87(1) and 88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Claimant claims the sums due from the Defendant following the legal assignment of the agreement from Hoist Portfolio Holding 2 Ltd (EX CAPITAL ONE). Written notice of the assignment has been given. The Claimant claims 1. The sum of 294  2. Costs   What is the total value of the claim? £369   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC I received a letter of claim & income / exp forms.   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? yes   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Not sure claim is for Credit card   When did you enter into the original agreement 2003   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement not sure   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files yes, as closed   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor. Assigned   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?  from HPH2 to HFUKH2L, I don't have anything from Cap One.   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes (2007) Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears” or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not sure, I’ve had letters from Robinson Way.   Why did you cease payments? illness and inability to deal with my debts, I had no money no job and my mental health was in a terrible state.   date of your last payment? 07/2014 paid to Robinson Way   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No (PPI and bank charges refunded)   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes   Do I send a CPR 31.14 next asking for the agreement, notice of assignment and the Default notice?   Thanks.
    • It states the charge as: 'did enter a compulsory ticket area without having with you a valid ticket. Contrary to Byelaw 17 (1) of the Transport for London Railway Bylaws Made under paragraph 26 of Schedule 11 to the Greater London Authority Act 1999 and confirmed under section 67 of the Transport Act 1962.' Then a brief statement of facts that the pass did not belong to me, and that I had stated it was due to financial reasons. It then contains information about making my plea and then the statement of the revenue officer. I am of course planning on pleading guilty before the cut off point and attending court (I'm hoping to be well enough to attend anyway). I'm just concerned about the consequences and if there is any point in trying to still reason with TfL now that court application costs are at least involved. I have debated getting a solicitor solely because of what I've read on the internet and what it says about ruined job prospects, I know it's probably scare tactics to get me to hire someone but it is the driving fear behind everything at the moment. 
    • You really MUST respond to the Singe Justice Procedure (SJP) notice and do so BEFORE the 'cut off' date.   Clearly, you will need to plead guilty and by doing so, you will benefit from having a one third discount in the amount of the fine issued.   You do not....I repeat NOT need to enlist the help of a solicitor and by pleading guilty, you will NOT be required to attend a hearing.   what exactly is stated on the charge sheet.    
  • Our picks

LongHairedLily

Ingeus- ingeus work jobs site

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2522 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Has anyone on the WP with Ingeus and been mandated to use their new website 'Ingeuswork.com'

 

Wondered if anyone had any feedback on it and their results? I have found very little helpful to me, the distances are cost prohibitive travel wise or the jobs unmatched to my criteria. I was sent a Teacher role and a Lawyers Assistant!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had a quick look at the site you mention, and what strikes me as being in particularly poor taste are the 4-5 links to payday loan companies that came up. I wonder what percentage cut Ingeus get for referrals?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi

 

Has anyone on the WP with Ingeus and been mandated to use their new website 'Ingeuswork.com'

 

Wondered if anyone had any feedback on it and their results? I have found very little helpful to me, the distances are cost prohibitive travel wise or the jobs unmatched to my criteria. I was sent a Teacher role and a Lawyers Assistant!

I assume that mandation to use the website is a privilege... reserved for conscripts who signed the Data Protection waiver.

 

In other respects.... have the Administrative Clerks at Ingeus that you have seen ever telephoned an employer on your behalf, where either a face to face interview or telephone interview has been arranged?

 

I also assume that, if after signing the Data Protection Waiver, a candidate revokes their permission (as they are entitled to do without fear of any sanction), that they may avoid IngeusWorks.

 

As for the vacancies contained within IngeusWorks, are they likely to be original and unique... or simply filtered from other jobs boards?

Edited by RebeccaPidgeon
Additional Information Submitted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went into Ingeus the other day and was asked to join the website just like I was asked to join Universal Jobmatch but they more expect you to say yes to these two big brother style snooping tools designed for expressly that purpose than allow you to get away with a flat refusal.

 

So I joined both to save any argument and for an easy life if interference in your life until you get so sick of them a job at minimum wage fifty miles away with transport costs making the job uneconomical can be seen as an easy life.

 

So far I've only had one lot of jobs sent to me by my adviser and they are all part time jobs about fifty miles away or in care homes or other such jobs I don't have the temperament for jobs like housekeeper I mean I'm a man for christ sake my friends would make my life a misery if I became a housekeeper or a domestic flipping assistant, care maybe but as I said I don't have the temperament for a lot of these jobs they think they can press gang me into, doubt I'd last a month.

 

Anyway I sorted the lot of them and it turned out every one of them are jobs already being advertised on the proper websites who's business it is to be in the advertisement role of advertising jobs and making a living out of it.

 

So I don't see the point when I can just search for the jobs myself I see it as just their way of snooping and checking up on you as they are getting a bit desperate now the first years figures have proved they don't do a damned thing to earn their money they take the credit for things that would have happened anyway don't they ?

 

Universal jobmatch is the same I used to just search the site and was never a member now I have to log in and they expect me to give them a reason if I don't apply for a job I look at but I just ignore the box I wouldn't waste breath telling them my reason for this that and the other it's none of their business you should be free to browse any website without having your neck constantly breathed down.

 

It's all big brother style nonsense I mean you have to laugh at Ingeus claim that their website is designed to make you more independent - by taking your discretion away from you and telling you what job's your suitable for I fail to see how that makes people more autonomous in their job searching activities.

 

It might not happen for a decade maybe longer but I surely do hope one day these people will end up on the right side of a court answering for all the laws and common based laws etc. that they are utterly disregarding, huma rights law being the obvious one that springs to mind but we all know what the tory party think of commoners having human right's it's just not on when it comes to private profits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I went into Ingeus the other day and was asked to join the website just like I was asked to join Universal Jobmatch but they more expect you to say yes to these two big brother style snooping tools designed for expressly that purpose than allow you to get away with a flat refusal.

 

So I joined both to save any argument and for an easy life if interference in your life until you get so sick of them a job at minimum wage fifty miles away with transport costs making the job uneconomical can be seen as an easy life.

 

So far I've only had one lot of jobs sent to me by my adviser and they are all part time jobs about fifty miles away or in care homes or other such jobs I don't have the temperament for jobs like housekeeper I mean I'm a man for christ sake my friends would make my life a misery if I became a housekeeper or a domestic flipping assistant, care maybe but as I said I don't have the temperament for a lot of these jobs they think they can press gang me into, doubt I'd last a month.

 

Anyway I sorted the lot of them and it turned out every one of them are jobs already being advertised on the proper websites who's business it is to be in the advertisement role of advertising jobs and making a living out of it.

 

So I don't see the point when I can just search for the jobs myself I see it as just their way of snooping and checking up on you as they are getting a bit desperate now the first years figures have proved they don't do a damned thing to earn their money they take the credit for things that would have happened anyway don't they ?

 

Universal jobmatch is the same I used to just search the site and was never a member now I have to log in and they expect me to give them a reason if I don't apply for a job I look at but I just ignore the box I wouldn't waste breath telling them my reason for this that and the other it's none of their business you should be free to browse any website without having your neck constantly breathed down.

 

It's all big brother style nonsense I mean you have to laugh at Ingeus claim that their website is designed to make you more independent - by taking your discretion away from you and telling you what job's your suitable for I fail to see how that makes people more autonomous in their job searching activities.

 

It might not happen for a decade maybe longer but I surely do hope one day these people will end up on the right side of a court answering for all the laws and common based laws etc. that they are utterly disregarding, huma rights law being the obvious one that springs to mind but we all know what the tory party think of commoners having human right's it's just not on when it comes to private profits.

I am sure that the jobs would be appealing to anyone stuck in a rut... and having failed to get a job in the Wealth Creating Sector, or Public Sector, are otherwise stuck in the demeaning Welfare To Work Sector.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean are you saying everyone should take any job no matter what even if it's exploitative and demeans the person even more than they feel they are without a job, is that an improvement on a persons circumstances I don't think it is I thinks it's one of those specious ideas.

 

I mean let's take the case of a slave there is this opinion that being a slave in a financial sense just because it's a job for him or her to do that he's better off in that job I really do find that idea specious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...