Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shanusascarabus V Yorkshirebank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6269 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all ! i`m at pretty much the same stage with a court date set for 22nd Feb. I received a second offer last week which was still missing the interest i`m intent on claiming. Rejection letter was posted today. The clocks ticking so time is running out YB.

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The template is fine but it misses any mention of Interest out, what would you alter to mention this, I was also thinking of putting something out that basically says that their figure is 200 short of mine but if they can explain how they got to their figure and its correct ill gladly re adjust my figures

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is your case one of those going to the Mercantile Directions Hearing?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im Sorry, I Dont Want To Hijack Your Thread, But Want To Start A New One For Me. I'm Sick Of The B**kets...

How Do I Do That Please?:-|

 

When you log on to the yorks bank forum,just click on the new thread button.Give it a title and away you go:rolleyes:

;) If this helps please click the scales bottom left
Link to post
Share on other sites

Er.... how do I say this....... I WON ha ha ha, sent me another offer through post and its my total amount + Interest + court costs Blah blah.... yippeeeeee, Iv just gotta send this tomlin order back off n stuff, do I need to do anything else as we all know how sly this bank is:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOOHOOOO CONGRATS, have you got the cheque in your hand? If not I would send a letter to accept the offer and to tell them you will send off all the documants once its all cleared in your account

 

Started 25th Sep 2006 - got cheque on 4th December 2006. Settled without interest but full amount plus court costs :)

A & L Watch out buddy you are next 2007!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Tomlin Order is not the usual procedure. I believe that means payment will have to go via the court. Dan-rides-bikes thread in the successes forum has something about this. Check it out, and I'll see if I can get you some advice on this. Hold fire and don't send it for now.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the tomlin order...............

 

 

Upon the parties having agreed terms of settlement set forth in the schedule attached here to

 

By Consent

 

It is ordered that:

 

1 The judgment dated 15th December 2006 in the sum of £+++ against defendant is set aside

 

2 The defendants application dated 4th January 2007 to set aside the judgement is withdrawn

 

3 All further proceedings in this action to be stayed exept for the purpose of carrying such terms into effect

 

4 Permission to apply to carry such terms into effect

 

5 There be no order as to costs of this application or in the case, and neither party shall enforce against the other any outstanding orders made in this case

 

then just the usual signatures blah blah blah,

 

All a bit too technical for my liking so.................. whats going on???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you already have judgment by default and they want it set aside, but are now ready to cough up. I didn't realise you already had judgment.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to get a legal opinion for you.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give them a call, and say your are unwilling to sign it as it makes no mention of settlement, and if they do not wish to settle and what to defend the claim you have a series of conditions to your consent and if they are unwilling to agree to your conditions the matter will have to go to a set aside hearing and you will be looking to recover your costs:

 

My own terms would be as follows:

 

1.The defendant has 14 days to file a defence.

2.The defendant to detail the cost of the charges to its self and give supporting evidence to such in it defence.

3.The defendant to pay into court the sum of claim as a bond

 

And if they are unwilling to consent to the above at the set aside hearing that will be needed.

 

4.Costs to the claimant.

 

And if they are willing to settle that the following be added to their consent order:

 

·Within 7 days of the claimant signing the consent order the defendant pay the claimant the sum of £(your claim).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Zooman.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, have been looking at your thread, have you got anything back yet? I have received a cheque twice for about 1/3 of the amount and need to now sort out a court date, have you reached that stage yet and how easy is it to do?

Fiona

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Barbera

 

Thank you for your offer of £xxx, I am sorry to inform you that I will not be accepting this offer as the actual Tomlin order makes no mention of the settlement exept for reference to the " attatched schedule ".

I would be willing to accept your offer if you insert onto the order the following :-

 

1 Within 7 Days of the claimant signing the consent order the defendant pay the claimant the sum of £xxx.

 

If you do not wish to settle, and wish to defend I have a list of conditions to your consent, these are

 

1 The defendant has 14 days to file a defence

 

2 The defendant to detail the cost of the charges to itself and give supporting evidence to such in its defence

 

3 The defendant to pay into court the sum claimed as bond

 

If you are unwilling to agree to my conditions the matter will have to go to a set aside hearing and I will be looking to recover my costs.

 

 

 

Does this make any sense to you guys....I must admit it dont to me ha ha ha..... Please feel free to let me know if I need to adjust anything....asap please cos the bank stated that they wanted me to sign and send back by the 5th Feb... thats today.

 

Cheers all

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...