Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vanquis and now Moorcroft headache


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, and please bear with me,

 

I've had a vanquis card since 2006 (limit £1750) with ups and downs but

 

this year I started struggling to pay the £100 or so each month in interest.

 

After missing a couple of payments an arrangement to pay £30 a month with all interest frozen was accepted by vanquis.

 

This was going fine until due to my health I was unable to pay the £30 in October.

 

I did email vanquis about this and sent a letter (not recorded stupidly) but other than a couple of threats from Impact and lots of phone calls that I ignored

I received no letters from vanquis until a notice of default arrived (dated 18th) giving me until 6th of November to make payment due.

 

I was able to pay the amount asked for by the day they requested (6th)

but I could only make payment on that day.

I did check evanquis before they blocked my access and they had received the payment from me that day.

 

On the 6th I also received a text from them threatening to pass me onto credit line (call credit?)

if I didn't pay and later on I received one about a one time offer to pay my outstanding balance minus 50% (could not afford).

 

I also paid the £30 for the next month as that had become outstanding and was back on my arrangement or so I thought.

 

Out of the blue I received a letter from Moorcroft (09/11) saying they had been instructed by vanquis to collect my debt

asking for full payment within seven days and telling me vanquis had defaulted me.

 

I was fairly surprised by this as I thought I'd paid vanquis by the date they stated

 

I sent a letter to them asking if I had actually been defaulted and why I was receiving letters from Moorcroft who I did not acknowledge any debt too (Vanquis have yet to reply).

 

I sent a CCA request to Moorcroft who did reply (14/11) saying

'we have approached our client with regards to the request who have confirmed that to obtain a copy of the agreement

you must put your request in writing to the following address (vanquis address).

 

That letter doesn't prove they hold the debt and have vanquis defaulted me as it has yet to appear on my credit file?

 

I have continued to pay vanquis and have received two letters from Moorcroft acknowledging the payments for the last two months but stating they should be going to them.

 

I thought the CCA had at least stopped Moorcroft from calling (it seemed to for a couple of weeks)

but they left a message on my home phone this evening saying to ring them as it was an emergency.

 

Any advice or answers you can give on all this, would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you received the Default Notice you were given a remedy date. If you made the payment requested by the due date then they probably wont record a default on your file... If you read the DN you will see that it says something like..

 

If the payment requested is made by the due date, then it is as though the default has not happened. Therefore, any of the threats they made to default you with the CRA's, terminate the account, issue legal proceedings or sell your first born into slavery.. will not happen.

 

Moorcroft are probably only acting as collection agents on behalf of Vanquis. If they have purchased the debt, then they should have sent you a Notice of Assignment.

 

 

Moorcroft should have simply passed the request on to Vanquis.. but there you go..

Send the CCA request to Vanquis .

 

Then send a letter to Moorcroft advising and confirming that it is not your practice to discuss your finances on the telephone. That it is your legal right to communicate in writing, which as holders of an OFT licence, they should be aware of.

 

That you are now insisting they remove your telephone number from their records and communicate as requested, in writing.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

stay off the phone to the spoofing dca

 

never ever call them

 

they are not bailiffs

 

they have no such legal powers

 

if you are getting letters offering a discount

 

then something is wrong

 

you've either got PPI to reclaim

 

or

heeps of unlawful £12 PENALTY fees

 

the same goes for them

 

if you've not got all the statements

 

then sar vanquis and get reclaiming

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both for the quick replies. I do actually have a letter already typed up for reclaiming fees but had yet to send it as I didn't want to incur this default for any reason, but will do so now along with a phone harassment letter to Moorcroft.

 

I guess I was just thrown by Moorcroft's involvement as I paid vanquis by the required date on the default notice letter and they have not contacted me since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll need to do a spreadsheet too

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

2nd one for court route via restitutional

 

or

last one fos route

 

if the refuse that is

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I sent both letters off by recorded delivery but unfortunately the Moorcroft one is 'in the delivery system' which probably means lost unfortunately. I'm still getting calls from them and a text today and they always leave answer phone messages which I hate.

 

I also received a normal statement from Vanquis today asking for the arranged amount so I have no idea why Moorcroft are even bothering.

 

Vanquis letter was delivered though (CCA and sub access request) so hopefully I can start reclaiming soon.

 

Thanks for the help again, will update when something substantial happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again,

 

So Vanquis have replied with the CCA and sub access request. The CCA response included a letter with the following:

 

'(1) your account is in debit to the amount of .......

(2) The amount currently payable by you is....... (Same as full amount above)

(3) If you do not draw further on the account, then you will have to pay Vanquis bank at any time on demand the above debit balance and any further interest accrued'

 

The third response confused me as I cannot draw on the account as I am under a payment plan. A statement I got from Vanquis for this month states I owe my payment plan amount by the end of the month (interest and charges still frozen).

 

As well as that letter I received a copy of my digital signature application details with my information filled in from when I applied

and a print out of the Vanquis credit card agreement and full terms.

 

I assume this is what they are required to provide and my goal was not to avoid paying a debt to Vanquis but to avoid dealing with Moorcroft and getting a default.

 

Speaking of Moorcroft

 

they have also sent me another couple more letters,

one of which was threats of further action (in comic sans, very professional)

followed by another which was a reply to my phone harassment letter.

 

This said they would agree to communicate in writing but that the account has remained 'active for recovery, as requested by our client'.

 

It also included an income and expenditure form to fill in.

 

In terms of the Subject Access Request I received a copy of account notation and a list of transactions and charges.

 

Essentially an excel spread sheet print out.

 

No actual copies of statements but I'm not too fussed as long as all the transactions and charges are included as they seem to be.

 

Now I don't plan on doing anything until after Christmas anyway but will following this up mean they'll want full payment on the account?

 

Further advice on all the above would be very much appreciated.

 

Hope you all have a Merry Christmas

Link to post
Share on other sites

moorcroft do not own the debt .

 

ignore them.

 

get that spreadsheet done with the charges.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...