Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

David Lloyd probems.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3947 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone! First post here, so be gentle.

 

I signed up for a 12 month contract with DL in October last year and did not fully read the 3 month cancellation clause and it wasn't pointed out to me at the time by the rep. I stupidly and naively thought the membership expired on 31st October this year and thought no more about it.

 

I received a letter on 15th November from DL informing me that I had to pay a balnce of £723.50 with the threat of ARC and a £70 admin fee. I immediately phoned head office and told them I wanted to cancel the membership immediately but they quoted the terms & conditions, etc. I was angry at DL's underhand methods and told this to the lady on the phone.

 

I received a letter from DL on 6th December that my membership would end on 31st January next year with a fee of £241.18I then went on this site and read other members stories, catching on very quickly that DL are bullying people and forcing them to hand over hard earned cash for services they do not want. I phoned my local branch and put that to them, being advised to write to the branch manager.

 

This morning I received a telephone call from ARC asking what was I going to do about payment - I initially told them I wanted them out as it was a dispute between DL and me, and then admitted I may pay by postdated cheques. They said they would hold for 7 days.

 

I phoned my local newspaper who are interested in my story, (but to warn others), I got a phone call from DL head Office reminding me to pay! I told the lady I was just off the phone to a reporter and she terminated the call.

 

So, I know I legally haven't a leg to stand on as I signed the T&C's but I am not going to be bullied and want my local community to be warned about these extortionists. Now that the stakes have been upped, I am doing the right thing? Any advice would be very gratefully received. Thanks,D

Edited by slick132
layout
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello and Welcome,

 

Best placed to help you would be Slick132 he'll be online later, hopefully someone else may give you some advice before then.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vondoothoven,

 

Firstly, do not discuss this by phone any more and keep everything in writing only. That way, you have a clear papertrail which is important.

 

Secondly, ignore ARC for now. They are a powerless pain in the rear and there's nothing they can do to force you to pay in the way, or the amounts, that they demand. The admin fees they are trying to charge are simply penalties and they are unenforceable, despite what they'll try to tell you. If ARC call again, tell them to put anything they have to say in writing and then HANG UP !

 

Don't worry that you may have offered to pay by post-dated cheques - you've taken advice and, now you know your rights, you'll only pay them what you owe, in a manner that you can afford.

 

Thirdly, I'd like some info :-

 

1. What was the monthly m/ship fee.

 

2. When did the initial 12 month agreement expire.

 

3. When did you cancel the DD Mandate.

 

4. Did you, in fact, pay the first 12 months' fees as required, in full and on time.

 

I wouldn't worry with the local papers. The truth is that you've been caught out by the 3 month cancellation clause because you failed to read the T&C's about m/ship properly. You're not the first, nor will you be the last !! :wink:

 

:-)

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the lack of paragraphs and the spelling mistakes - as I said, that was my first post and although I put paragraphs in, my message got squashed.

 

Thanks very much for taking the time and effort to read and reply, its much appreciated.

 

I actually paid £602.90 by debit card on the 31.10.11 just in case things went pear shaped at the end of my membership on 31.10.12 and I am so glad I did. There are obviously no direct debits involved.

 

 

My thinking behind the press was twofold. Firstly, I was hoping DL head office would waive the outstanding charges if I threatened to print. When they phoned me yesterday asking for me to pay, I told them I was just off the phone to a reporter. (which I was). The lady immediately told me she was terminating the phone call and hung up. Secondly, I wanted to bring it to the attention of local people who may get caught like myself.

 

 

I have limited experience of bailliffs, but would there be any chance of them turning up early in the morning and seize my car as I would obviously not let them into my house? That is my biggest fear.

 

 

Thanks again for your help!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Von and thanks for the info above.

 

Regarding bailiffs turning up to seize your car, that's simply NOT going to happen.

 

Ok, so you paid the fees last year in one go and there was no DD mandate.

 

Ignore ARC and write to the gym saying:-

 

I have received demands from ARC seeking payment of £723.50 which I entirely dispute.

 

As you are aware, I called the David Lloyd head office on 15th November confirming my anger at the demand and my wish to cancel membership with immediate effect.

 

I am willing to pay you one month's fee for the notice period (about £50) but I will not pay the ridiculous amount demanded by ARC.

 

I will not pay you 3 month's notice fee The initial minimum membership period expired on 31st October and 3 months notice is not reasonable according to Mr Justice Kitchin in his ruling on The OFT -v- Ashbourne Management Services Ltd last year.

 

If you confirm the amount due for one month and you agree to accept that amount in full and final settlement of all sums due from me, I will arrange payment within 7 days of your letter.

 

If you fail to accept my offer within 14 days, it will be withdrawn and I shall assume you have let the matter drop.

 

See how they respond. :wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Slick,

 

Just to confirm, the final amount to pay was £241.18 - its still ridiculous as its a bill for a service I do not want or will ever use.

 

One last thing, should I sent it to the Head office or my local gym?

 

The 'going to press' will be a wild card though - will probably get a letter from DL in the next few days though.

 

Thanks again!

 

Vondoothoven

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Von,

 

Now my brain's hurting !!

 

I can see figures mentioned of £723.50, £602.90 and £70, but I have no idea how the amount of £241.18 comes into it all.

 

Anyway, amend my suggested letter as necessary and send it off to DL's HO address.

 

And, just to satisfy my curiosity, how does the amount of £241.18 fit into the equation ? :???:

 

Please also post up a copy of the final letter to them.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha, Slick, you are working too hard.

 

£241.18 - in my original thread, its the 4th paragraph down - thats the final amount DL were looking for 3 months membership until 28.2.13

 

K, I will compose the letter tommorrow and copy on to here. I will also post DL's reply, (if any), and the outcome of the dispute.

 

Thanks again for your time and patience.

 

Cheers,

Vondoothoven

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received demands from ARC seeking payment of £311.19 which I entirely dispute.

 

Sorry I haven't been on for ages - busy,, busy, busy.

 

I posted this on 1th December to DL head office.

 

As you are aware, I called the David Lloyd head office on 15th November confirming my anger at the demand and my wish to cancel membership with immediate effect.

 

I am willing to pay you one month's fee for the notice period (£50.24) but I will not pay the ridiculous amount demanded by ARC.

 

I will not pay you 3 month's notice fee as the initial minimum membership period expired on 31st October and 3 months notice is not reasonable according to Mr Justice Kitchin in his ruling on The OFT -v- Ashbourne Management Services Ltd last year.

 

If you confirm the amount due for one month and you agree to accept that amount in full and final settlement of all sums due from me, I will arrange payment within 7 days of your letter.

 

If you fail to accept my offer within 14 days, it will be withdrawn and I shall assume you have let the matter drop.

Edited by slick132
used paras to make it readable
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I haven't been on for ages - I have been busy, busy, busy. I posted the above letter to DL head office on 11th December and received a standard reply on 14th that my outstanding balance is now £190.60. As theirs was dated 12th I am not sure whether DL read my letter before sending their own or we crossed in the post. No post today, 17th.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Von,

 

Sounds like their letter of 12th Dec'r was NOT a reply to your offer.

 

Wait for their next letter and see what they say about your offer to pay only one month's fee as cancellation notice.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

K, thought that Slick. Just had another phone call from ARC - I know I should have told them to write as you advised, but they were not aware of DL's offer of £190.60 offered to me on the 12th. ARC said they would leave the matter for another 6 days. Would phoning OFT or the Ombudsman be helpful? I have also health issues which go in my favourwhich I could PM you if you want. Von

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Von,

 

If ARC call again, tell them to put it in writing as this will always buy you a bit more time and peace !!

 

Ombudsman is not able to deal with gym matters and the OFT will only log your complaint - they can't and won't offer advice or intervention.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just received letter from ARC which reads:

 

We are writing with regards to a recent conversation we had with you regarding the above account.

 

We have contacted our client and have now received an update from them. Please can you call us in the next 7 days to discuss your account.

 

If we have not received a response from you within the next 7 days, this account will be passed tp our Legal Department for further action.

 

J. Turner.

 

**********

 

Any idea how to respond to same?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

Von.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear sir or madam,

 

I refer to your letter of xxdate.

 

I made an offer to pay the gym £50.24 which, so far, they have failed to acknowledge, despite the fact that my offer was for a limited period of 14 days.

 

I therefore have no reason, nor the desire, to contact you as you suggest and I will ignore further communication from you.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received a letter from ARC about an hour ago. Very quick response as I sent the above recommended reply on Thursday with a 2nd class stamp.

 

 

***************************

Balance £311.19

 

We are writing to inform you that as you have failed to keep to the terms of the offer you made to us, we have terminated this agreement.

 

The agreement was made outside of our normal repayment terms, as a good will gesture on our part, to help you clear this debt. However,as you have broken the agreement the full balance is now due.

 

We have to inform you that unless we receive the full balance or a substantial payment within the next 10 days, along with a firm offer to clear the rest of the overdue balance, we may pass your account to our solicitors, with prepare court proceedings.

 

**************************

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Von,

 

I assume they refer to your offer to pay by post-dated cheques which you mentioned in your very first post above,

 

I see no reason to respond to ARC further as you've already made your position very clear in the letter in post #18.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, funny how they've flipped it all around.

 

You've made your offer to the gym and they failed to accept it.

 

Tough on them, is what I say !

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep the receipt safe in case it's needed later.

 

Otherwise, ignore them.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just got this from ARC today.

 

"We are disappointed to note that you have not cleared your balance following our previous letter. On the instructions of our client, we can now take steps to prepare a County Court Claim against you for recovery of the above debts.

 

A Court Claim will be prepared ten days after the date of this letter, unless we receive either payment in full or a substantial payment and a firm commitment to clear the remaining balance. You may want to seek independent legal advice from a solicitor, debt counsellor, Citizens Advice Bureau or similar organisation on this matter.

 

If this action is necessary and we pass the Court Claim to our solicitor for issue, our client is entitled to claim interest under the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum together with fixed court fees and solicitor fees amounting to a further £80"

 

Letter continues about debt still not being paid, Court Judgement, etc.

 

Martin Wicks, (FCILEx) - Chartered Legal Executive

Legal Manager - ARC (Europe) Ltd.

 

*********************

 

I would have a good guess what FCILEx stands for, but no swearing on forums. lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...