Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

advice needed.


pca2012
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi my son and i are thinking about moving in with my partner he pays csa for his daughter every wk and he was told off someone that if we were to live together that my wages get taken into account and that i would have to contribute to those payments he makes, baring in mind i only work 16hrs a wk i dont think this is right paying for someone elses child .,:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't think of one ..... under CSA-2 ..... it's cold hard calculations

Which is, both good, and bad!

 

The terrible thing, with CSA payments, wether we make em, or recieve em

is the emoction, invovlement.

 

It really helps, if you can detach yourself. And just accept the enevitable.

 

But from experience...... always always always, check the figures.

The CSA get their numbers wrong, all too often.

 

In this particular case, the OP and her partner will be better off.

But of course, the suppported child, will be worse off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlkess the partner, has had, a 1 off bonus, earlier in the year.

Or had a salary increase, between, annual assesment.

 

Then, there's not a lot else, the ex partner can appeal on.

 

In fact, I'd go as far as to say, it's none of her business.

The op and her partner, can ask for a reassment, and the result, will be what the ex partner will recieve.

Based on the fact, there's a new dependant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I'm not going into details but I appealed a CSA decision and we are currently waiting on a tribunal date. I have a damm good reason for appealing the decision and the CSA accepted it hence the tribunal.

 

It would be wrong for us to say to the poster of this thread that her partners ex can do nothing about it because its not strictly true. However its unlikely because the ex partner will need a really good reason for the appeal if its to even be looked at by the CSA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to see an example, becuase I can't think of one.

 

If the OP's partner has paid the correct amount, and has been, for all of the claim.

Then it's quite simple.

 

If there's been an underpayment, or some skulldugery, on his part(e.g not declaring income)

Then an appeal, can be maid. Although its not an appeal, but a supply of further information, to be investigated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm afraid you won't be seeing my example as it involves my two children's ongoing medical conditions and care. Obviously quite sensitive information I won't be posting on a forum that anyone can read. Also just because you cannot think of an example doesn't mean there aren't exceptions to the rule.

 

The OP has asked if her moving in with her parnter will have an effect on her wages. The short answer is that it won't as her wages are not taken into account. However the ex partner could appeal the decision that would be made which could result in a tribunal hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appeal for what ??

And I did'nt ask you for personal info

In fact I did'nt ask you for anything. I'd just like to see an example.

 

So, What could the OP's partners ex, have grounds for an appeal ?

 

I like to add to my knowledge bank

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again see what i find annoying my daughter is 21 and i split from her father before she was born and she has never had anything what so ever from him he knew all about her and stayed in the same area all her life when i met my sons father down south i was working full time and we were together for over a yr before i fell for my son we moved bk to my home town in scotland he was living with me for a yr after his birth before we split and after we split he paid me £40 pound a fortnight for the first 8months after we split and that was taken from my benefits and after that didnt hear from him again and the social security asked me if they would like them to contact him for csa payments and months later i got a letter saying the 3rd party didnt want to proceed with it whatever that meant i dont know

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could ring the CSA and make a claim for your son. I don't think he gets the option not to proceed if he is named on the birth certificate. All I did when I split from my husband was ring the CSA, follow the options for making a new claim then gave them my details, the kid details and confirmed my ex was named on both birth certificates. Gave them my ex's name and address and they contacted him then wrote to me with details of how much I was entitled to per week etc. Took about 5 minutes on the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...