Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because there was still £69 owing, I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle. However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account ......... has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VF & Small Claims


ShaneG2009
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3584 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

 

I had a chance to read through the questionnaire last night and its confirmed it is merely the document confirming the case is in their estimation eligable for the small claims track. They do suggest i go down the route of mediation as it could be ordered by the judge even if i refuse.

 

The questionnaire is simple to fill out so i am going to get it done over the weekend and back to the Court copied to VF. How / when do i go about issuing a response to VF's defence?

 

Thanks

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 272
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Quick update all

 

I've had a further letter from VF's Solicitor (Riverview) today. They've filled in the questionnaire referred to in the above posts. They have confirmed that VF are open to have the case referred to the Mediation service in lieu of a Court Hearing at this stage.

 

Does anyone have any experience of using this service? Is it worth it? What is the format for it (i.e. can i present my response to their defence or is this done separately?)

 

I'd appreciate all of your help in progressing things now, i suppose VF are finally acting swiftly so i ought to return the favour and get my questionnaire in place with them and the courts?

 

Thanks

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may as well go for the mediation - although I don't exepct it will do any good.

 

Please keep in close contact with us about this.

 

Mediation does not mean that you have to give up your rights.

Make sure that you prepare a list of your minimum outcomes and don't accept anything less than these

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may as well go for the mediation - although I don't exepct it will do any good.

 

Please keep in close contact with us about this.

 

Mediation does not mean that you have to give up your rights.

Make sure that you prepare a list of your minimum outcomes and don't accept anything less than these

 

Hi BF

 

OK ill get the forms back to them indicating I am happy to try mediation.

 

For me the absolute minimum is the removal of the Default. Given VF's past stance on this request I assume we'll be heading for a hearing however maybe it will change when the circumstances are presented in front of a Court mediator.

 

Ill of course keep you all in the loops. Finally am I required to submit a reply to VF's defence or shall I just wait until the outcome of mediation.

 

Thnks

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no requirement to supply a reply to a defence. It is only something you can do if it is going to be helpful.

 

If you do one, then leave it until after the mediation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a telephone appointment, isn't it.

 

Make sure that you have your minimum outcomes listed and don't give way. You can always go to court where I am sure you will get the result you need.

 

Make lots of detailed notes during the conversation and also go back and add to your notes after it has finished - immediately and without waiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a telephone appointment, isn't it.

 

Make sure that you have your minimum outcomes listed and don't give way. You can always go to court where I am sure you will get the result you need

 

Hi BF

 

Yes it is but apparently not in a conference call manner. The mediator explained that I'd be called first and given the chance to explain my side of things and then they'd talk to the defendant.

 

I know the minimum for me is removal of the default and am very prepared to go on to court if this is not the outcome.

 

Thanks

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I didn't expect that it would be a conference.

 

You should also hold out for compensation. Have a good figure in mind and be prepared to compromise on that.

 

If there is an agreement to remove the default, then make sure you have a time-scale for that. Max 14 days, I suggest. Make sure that the agreement is to rmeove the default completely - not judt correct it. They might want to correct it as a compromise.

 

In court you would achieve total removal and a good figure in compensation. there is not a lot of need for you to accept much else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mediations are a very valuable way of getting dispute settled I have been involved in quite a few, the mediator is not a judge or a lawyer and cannot give you legal advice.

 

When you have put your 'case' and please make sure you have at least a full list of all points you wish to make and what you want from the mediation process.

 

I would suggest that a 'bullet' layout is easiest to use.

 

Listen carefully to what the mediator relays to you record the process if you can, if not put you phone in loudspeaker mode and have some one take notes for you.

 

You are NOT bound to anything discussed until decide that you are satisfied with the scenario and even then you can still change your mind before a 'consent order) Tomlin Order is made and sent to court to be sealed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are going to record the call then I think that you should tell the mediator. Normally you don't have to but I think that it is sensible and polite in this case

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Thanks for the pointers. I will have my POC and other notes to hand when i take the call. At this stage i think the following but open to your suggestions: -

 

1) Removal of the Default in its entirety

 

2) Refund of the £282 'penalty / early termination charges' + interest charges. VF have had this money and if i can prove it may not have been entitled to it.

 

3) £500 in compensation for financial harm default has caused me over the last 2 years i.e. sub-prime credit (Capital One CC and 30% APR Car Finanace deal)

 

My compromise on the above is something like this: -

 

1) No compromise on the Default, i want that removed in its entirety within 14 days.

 

2) Suggestions??

 

3) Compromise would be £250 (50% reduction)

 

What do you think as a start-off?

 

Thanks

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

No compromise on actual losses

 

Up to you to agree a lower figure in compensation.

 

Of course, for them the sticking point will be the default. That is likely to bring the whole mediation crashing to the ground.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default definately will be the sticking point for them. If they dont compromise it can go to a judge and he can decide if it's lawful.

 

Im very content on going the full hogg on this one, i've nothing to lose really as to be fair the damage has already been done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck.

Vodafone seem to be especially prone to making such a pig's ear of people's credit files through their own poor procedures.

If it goes to court and there is a judgment against them, I hope that you will find time to report it to the Information Commissioner and to trading standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good. I may have a couple of journalists lined up as well. The fact that Vodafone are acting so stupidly about this makes me realise that they care as little for their own reputation as for yours.

 

It is a shame that someone in a position of responsibility at Vodafone doesn't know about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me about it BF, they stand by whats down on their headed paper and they do not seem to have a care in the world about sorting themselves out. It would be great to see them named and shamed in the national press!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok update...

 

So i had my mediation this morning. I put my points across to them and VF Solicitors say they applied the default correctly and the ETC theyve applied as part of that is as per their terms & conditions and would not be removed. Their solicitor kept saying to the mediator that the judge (if it went to court) would side with them because they had favorable 'verdicts' from the ombudsman. This is despite the fact the Ombudsman said they were not empowered to rule on the legality of the ETC and how its applied etc hence why i was now taking things to Court. Their solicitor also said to the mediator that i district judge wouldnt be able to rule on this case...not sure if that was simply a throw away comment to move me away from the courts (it hasnt Lee from Vodafone if you are reading and reporting this tread back to your powers that be :).

 

I ended by asking the mediator to ask VF solicitor her thoughts on OFCOM's guidance and the response to that was that she was now going to speak to her clients about removal but she doubts they'd be progress as its 'company policy not to remove correctly placed defaults'. I said this one is not correctly placed and im happy to have a judge review the whole lot.

 

The mediator was fair and we've scheduled a further call tomorrow after she has heard back from the Solicitor. I dont believe they will cave but lets wait & see.

 

Cheers

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for gate crashing your post shane but I wanted to ask a quick question. How long did it take for the courts mediation to be arranged? I’m in a dispute with a company at the moment and returned my directions questionnaire before the due date of 1st july, does it take long for them to make contact?

 

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Timings will vary wildly depending on the willingness of the parties to agree to mediation, all parties must fully support the mediation process.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know which path the mediation is proposed to take, telephone or court appointment?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...