Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have previously posted about a dispute my parents have had with LL who has had little to do with the property they have rented for the last 35 years.   Fast forward to today, LL has applied for fair rent which was registered and the LL has finally brought the property to a safe standard following involvement from the local council.   We have received a new bombshell.. that the LL has applied for a possesion order under a notice of seeking possesion of a secure tenancy (NOSP).   Under grounds 3, 4 and 10.   I googled and found below:   Ground 3 –  Deterioration in the condition of the property The tenant, or anyone else living in the property, must have caused deterioration in the condition of the property or common parts. If damage is caused by a lodger or subtenant of the tenant (without the tenant's consent), possession will not be granted if the tenant has taken reasonable steps to evict that person. Ground 4 –  Deterioration in furniture provided The tenant, or anyone else living in the property, must have caused deterioration in the condition of furniture provided by the landlord in the property or common parts. Where damage is caused by a lodger or subtenant of the tenant (without the tenant's consent), possession will not be granted if the tenant has taken reasonable steps to evict that person. Ground 10 – Demolition or major works Where the landlord intends either to demolish or reconstruct or do works to the property and needs possession in order to do so. The landlord must prove that it intends carrying out works and such work cannot reasonably be carried out without obtaining possession.[2] If the tenant agrees to vacate the premises temporarily while the works are carried out then there may be no need for possession. The displaced tenant will normally be entitled to compensation.[3] See Problems during repairs for information on compensation for loss of home.   My question is, following the fair rent register and an agreement that parents were covered under the 1977 rent act we were under the impression this is a regulated tenancy, not a secure tenancy?? or is there no difference?   Its a private rent, not through housing association and the property has just been deemed as safe under by the council.   We have also never been approached by the LL to say they felt that my parents have caused any damage or deterioration in the condition of the property. If anything, over the years it has vastly been improved by my parents. We raised safety issue to the council following repeated attempts for LL to repair the dangerous electrics and blocked drains.   If there is no difference in the tenancy types, what should our next step be? any thoughts?   More info if needed in my original thread https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421879-major-repairs-to-letting-of-a-sitting-tenant/?tab=comments#comment-5064284          
    • Keep in mind also that the companies in administration are currently at the moment putting plans in place to change reporting depending on IRR Claims etc / Criteria set out by the Administrators. 
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Please Help!! :( Company threaten legal action for me selling their brand on eBay - New Era

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2906 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi, I sold about 20 caps on ebay and my listing got removed and told that these caps were counterfeit. I received a letter by post a few weeks later from "new era" with the print screen of their order details and some undertaking for me to sign. I sent them the signed undertaking and agreed to never sell these again and i was unaware that these were fake.


I sent the original undertaking by email and by post. they replied to my email saying that i need to tell them how much profit i made and i told them that after deducting all fees, posting fees ect i made about £240, and after about nearly 2 weeks, today i received a email saying that they will accept £225 by the 7TH DECEMBER!!. I am in no financial state to pay them £225!


please help me with this, i will be grateful for any advise you guys can give me, do these guys really have a case? is there a way i can get out of this without paying them.


I am just a student and i was trying to make some extra money by buying few caps from a wholesaler.


thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The emails they have sent me have no name and not signed by anyone. The last email they sent me was


" Sale of counterfeit caps on your ‘my ebay i.d’ eBay user account


New Era Ref: "my ebay i.d"


Thank you for the information about the profit you made from the sale of New Era Caps. As per clause (e) of the undertakings, you are required to pay the account of profits figure to New Era, we will accept £225 in this instance and look forward to receiving this by 7th December 2012.


Yours sincerely,


Brand protection


New Era"


I opened this thread as soon as i received this! thanks again guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must not pay anyone anything at least until there is certainty these products were in fact counterfeit. If you wish to continue with the dialogue with them, then you should insist that all correspondence is on company headed paper by post and will consider all correspondence as unauthoristed unless complete with a legible signature.


Have they asked who this wholesaler was?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, None of the email i received has any name signed on them and no signatures either!, Although the one letter that i received was signed by someone but there was no name or anything, it just said "New era brand protection"

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must insist on proof and not just a piece of paper saying so. Sorry, but this is a US company and I trust US companies as much as I trust the inmates of Wormwood Scrubs.


Have they asked for any stock you have remaining? Have they asked where you got them ? Have they asked anything ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Yes in the post reply, i sent the signed undertaking, the proof of the website where i ordered them from, i told them that i have no more of these caps and Dont intend on getting or selling anymore as i now know what kind of hats these are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the help guys!, basically this is the first email they sent me when i sent them a scanned copy of the undertakings


" Thank you for your email. We look forward to receiving the original undertakings via post.


As per the contents of the letter, we would be grateful if you could supply us with the following:-


I. full details of all items delivered up pursuant to undertaking © above;


II. the names and addresses of all persons, firms, companies or organisations who have offered to supply, supplied or delivered to me any of the Counterfeit Goods;


III. the total number and total value of the Counterfeit Goods, stocked, imported to or exported from the United Kingdom by me or sold or otherwise supplied by me in the United Kingdom; and


IV. copies of any relevant purchase / sale documentation relating to (d)II-III above in my possession, power, custody or control which related to such information.


To pay you an amount to be agreed to compensate you as an account of the profits I have made or, if we cannot agree the amount within 14 days from the date of these undertakings, we will submit to a court"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do follow Connif's advice.

I would also be interested to know which country the letter came from. Could you please put it up for us to see.


Let me give you a few details about your situation. If a claim was brought against you, it would normally be brought in the County Court as a small claim. This means that if you lost the case, you would not be faced with having to pay the other side's costs.


However, if this company is trying to carry out a sweep of counterfeit goods then they might try to make a more serious issue of it.


They want you to turn your profits over to them. However, as Connif has indicated, they have not provided evidence that the caps are fake - although I suppose that they very likely are.

They have not show that they are the owners of any of the rights in the caps - and finally, you need to break down the rights.


Are these caps sold exclusively by this company or can you get the same caps elsewhere but with different badges etc on them?


If New Era is simply in the business of buying caps from some general supplier and then adding value to them by putting on lifestyle branding (character merchandising) - then the only profit they can claim from you is the added value from the branding. The profit from the cap itself, is yours to keep.

It might be that the cap is a generic cap - easily available - and that the branding causes an improvement in the value of, say, £5. In that case would only be liable to pay over £5 per cap.


On the other hand, if New Era have rights in the caps themselves because they were manufactured to their own design, then they are more justified in demanding that you turn over all of your profit to them.


So if you challenge them, I think that not only you need to ascertain if they are the rights-holders but also what is it that they say they hold the rights to? - The branding/motifs/badges? or the cap as well.


It would be a very good idea to start searching the internet to see if you can find identical caps for sale - and eventually see if you can find the source of the unbranded item.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm not able to read the last two. Try photobucket.


I see that in the first one they are referring to an "account of profits". This is very legal technical language coming directly from the company. They've done this before.


Anyway, - account of profits - is precisely what I have described to you above. You would be required to disclose to a court what profits you have made and then turn them over to the claimant - so no surprises there.

However, to ask for an account, they would have to disclose to a court just exactly what their rights are - so no surprises there either.

If they wanted damages - frankly this would be about the same as the account.


I expect that this company has done this before and is used to getting all of the money and is not used to be asked funny questions as to what rights do they actually own.

Link to post
Share on other sites
here this link should work: "s1289.beta.photobucket.com/user/a118822/library/" *please remove the space between com and paste in the url*








Can't open the link on my phone, could you post a copy of the undertaking you signed? Did you read it and understand what the undertaking was before signing?!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...