Jump to content


mar1kos

MBNA Mis-sold PPI

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2534 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Link financial will not send PPI documents with s78 request as it has been settled.

They are saying "A statutory response is not required by the Act to include matters no longer in force and for which no funds are owed".

Is this valid any help appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is correct.

 

Link are the wrong people to be asking for data. You should SAR the original creditor and add a line to the letter to say that it is to include copies of all and any agreements you have ever had with them.


If I have helped you please leave me a message by clicking my star

 

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI

Read Here

3. Reclaim Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial

Read Here

5. Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

6. Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

7. Thinking of a Full & Final Settlement?

Read Here

 

How To Upload Documents To Cag

Instructions

 

I DON'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM BUT IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

 

 

 

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are perhaps inappropriate for posting on the main forum. Site rules explain this in more detail.

 

If you receive a private message which you consider abusive, derogatory or otherwise inappropriate, whether it be about yourself or other members, please report it using the "report" icon

 

If you are approached (or have been approached) by private message with an offer of help "Off Forum" or with a view to asking you to visit another website, please inform the site team via the report icon, especially if this results in a request for a fee. Remember, this is for your own protection

my views are my own and are given in good faith to try and help people. Please seek professional advice on your case if necessary

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did SAR request to MBNA no PPI documents were sent.

When i did request pursuant S78 to link the sent the agreement but no PPI documents.

They conceded it was not compliant.

Now they are saying there was no need for PPI documents as its been mis sold and settled and therefore they fulfilled their obligation under S78 by just sending the credit agreement without any document refered into it i.e PPI.

This their response to my defence for the court

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Court?

 

Can we have the full story please?

 

You mention the word "settled"...what has been settled?


If I have helped you please leave me a message by clicking my star

 

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI

Read Here

3. Reclaim Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial

Read Here

5. Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

6. Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

7. Thinking of a Full & Final Settlement?

Read Here

 

How To Upload Documents To Cag

Instructions

 

I DON'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM BUT IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

 

 

 

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are perhaps inappropriate for posting on the main forum. Site rules explain this in more detail.

 

If you receive a private message which you consider abusive, derogatory or otherwise inappropriate, whether it be about yourself or other members, please report it using the "report" icon

 

If you are approached (or have been approached) by private message with an offer of help "Off Forum" or with a view to asking you to visit another website, please inform the site team via the report icon, especially if this results in a request for a fee. Remember, this is for your own protection

my views are my own and are given in good faith to try and help people. Please seek professional advice on your case if necessary

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Link financial satarted court proceedings in august 2012. (Credit card with MBNA)

 

The account was in dispute (S78 request not fulfilled, balance inaccurate) and Link even refusing a good will of monthly payment plan.

 

They just went for court proceedings without any notice or reply to my letters.

 

CPR 31.14 sent to link ..no reply up to now ...

 

I filed my defence, a court stay was ordered as link did not respond.

 

In the meantime MBNA admitted PPI mis-selling and sent me a refund.

 

LInk sent me their reply to my defence to court few weeks ago.

 

Link sent me a Tomlin Order with charging order on my house. Accepting the Payment plan i offerer them months ago.( which i am refusing)

Link also added their fees to the account. (while they admitted non compliance with s78)

 

In their response :

 

1. They conceded that their reply to my initial S78 request was not compliant.

 

2. Regarding S78 ..any documents refered into agreement..link are saying there is no duty to send them as PPI is settled.

 

"A statutory response is not required by the Act to include matters no longer in force and for which no funds are owed".

i know MBNA as per SAR Request and Link has no PPI documents or policy .

 

3. They are saying also that they are permitted to start court proceeding even when the account was in dispute.

 

4. My defence was also based on Section 18 muliple agreement. Link are claiming it is a Unitary agreement as per s18(b)

They are quoting Heath vs Southern pacific mortgages. They are saying:"The agreement is one integrated package could not be split without affecting the character of transaction."

 

5. PPI mis selling and unfair relationship.

Link are saying :"PPI was a contractual matter not a relationship matter"

6.CPP mis selling (which i am claiming)

Link are saying :"CPP was a contractual matter not a relationship matter"

7.CPP : Link are wrongly claiming in their reply that there are no debits to the account for CPP

 

Any advice appreciated

Edited by mar1kos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Markos

 

I assume the claim is now stayed...they remain in default of your section 78 request...you have received a refund re the PPI. Having received a response to your defence (which is twaddle) until the AQ is initiated it will remain stayed.

 

What advice do you require?

 

Regards

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...