Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SB in Scotland /CRA Defaults


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Excuse me if I seem a bit thick here.

 

Iv been doing some reading on what constitutes a statute barred debt in Scotland

And as far as I can see after 5 years of no payment or admission of the debt under the prescriptions and limitations act

the debt is not only deemed unenforceable but actually ceases to exist.

 

Is this correct?

 

Now my next point.

 

Assuming I'm correct in the above and the debt ceases to exist.

 

Can a CRA still show the debt as being in default after the 5 year period.

 

Or do they have to remove it.

 

I believe that after 6 yrs I drops off anyway.

 

But I'm just curious to find out if a 5yr old debt in Scotland

can be removed for being recorded on the Cra files

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok that's what I thought.

 

Now what I'd like to know is would there be grounds to challenge the CRAs legally to remove these after the five year limit

because in the eyes of the law (Scotland) these debts cease to exist.

 

Therefore arnt the Cras being detrimental to your financial wellbeing by reporting a default on something that no longer exists

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok that's what I thought. Now what I'd like to know is would there be grounds to challenge the CRAs legally to remove these after the five year limit because in the eyes of the law (Scotland) these debts cease to exist. Therefore arnt the Cras being detrimental to your financial wellbeing by reporting a default on something that no longer exists

 

Hi,

 

I know and agree with what your saying but I'm sure if this was going to be challenged, someone would have done it by now.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe so.

 

Or it may well be that no one has considered challenging it Either way

 

I find it ridiculous that a CRA will allow debts to be shown as defaulted

when in actual fact they legally do not exist anymore

Edited by bluebear1872
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't find anything of much interest regarding the legalities of this issue, seems as these CRA's are English based the 6 years applies across the board, dosen't seem right.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

The act is for the bringing of an action .......not when it disappears

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I get that.

 

But my point is if this act states that after 5yrs the debt will cease to exist then what gives the CRAs the right to continue reporting it.

 

Surely a debt that no longer exists in the eyes of the law(scotland)cannot be reported in such a way that it has a detrimental affect on your financial record

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are doing what most people do

 

linking anything to do with statute barring with the way your

financial history is recorded by credit reference agencies.

 

there is NO LINK.

 

your 'accounts' will show on the cra systems for:

6yrs from settled

6yrs from default date [paid or not]

6yrs from YOUR last financial transaction

 

whichever is the soonest.

 

statute barring has nothing to with what is/is not on your cra file.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which emphasises my point. After 5 years the prescriptions and limitations act deems the debt to have been extinguished and this means it no longer exists.

 

How can a CRA Report the financial history of a debt that doesn't exist

I can understand why in English law they can as after 6 years it still exists but is just deemed uncollectable

But what I'm specifically asking about are debts covered by the debts covered by the prescriptions and limitations act in Scotland Once the debt ceases to exist surely the cra is obliged to stop reporting it

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF the account has been defaulted it is removed after 6 years in England and five in Scotland and cannot be repoted on further.

 

Yes the reporting must continue even If the criteria for SB are met no payment

or acknowledgment in writting has not been made, but the default period has time to run.

 

The default date is as dx100 said the important date fo removal of the cra entries.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying and yes I do understand what your saying. But I fear your missing my main point

 

Under the prescriptions and limitations act(scotland)

Not only does the debt itself become unenforceable. The debt ceases to exist.

now if the debt no longer exists in the eyes of the law then why is it allowed to be reported on your credit file. I'm sorry if I'm being thick here But surely of something no longer exists then it cannot be reported on

Link to post
Share on other sites

and you are missing ours....

 

your credit file is a record of your credit history.

 

just because a debt is SB, it does not mean it should not be there.

 

if your debt has updates follow the 5yrs,

then i suggest you write to the CRA's

 

but i bet i know the answer.

 

and its prob already been asked in their FAQ's.

 

i refer you to post 11

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has the default still go time to run, they continue to be posted until the 5th anniversary of the default date!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok now I'm really confused. Brig you say they stop reporting on the 5th anniversary of the default but dx states that they continue to report for 6yrs irrespectively Who is correct?

I have a couple of defaults last paid in April 2009. So the 5yr mark would be 2014

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok a debt becomes sb in Scotland after 6 years no pyment or written acknowledgement made, but the default date will up to 6 monhs after the last payment so the default entry remains until the life of the default ends.

 

if any payment has been made at any time in the 5 year period the''clock'' is restarted and reporting contiues.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I don't follow. The prescriptions and limitations act state that after a period of five years of no payment or admission of the debt it not only becomes uncollectable but the debt itself is extinguished So how can it be 6yrs till it then becomes SB in Scotland. I appreciate that that defaults will remain for a period after the five year mark But the debt itself no longer exists

 

Sorry if I'm confusing things here I'm just trying to get it straight in my head how it works as regards a debt for a Scottish resident and the reporting on the cra files for that debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

bluebear, I think the Brig meant to say 5 years :-)

 

I know what your saying, as I said before I think the 6 year on your credit file is just applied across the board in the uk, don't know if anyone has tried to do anything about it, maybe you should, I wouldn't hold my breath though.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

THE DEBT CAN ONLY BE REPORTED ON IF IT IS STILL ''LIVE'' IE ACKNOWLEDGED, OR THE DEFAULT IS ACTIVE.

OTHERWISE IF REPORTING CONTINUES YOU MUST MAKE FORMAL COMPLAINT TO TE DATA CONTROLLER OF THE COMPANY PLACING THE ENTRY SEND COPY OF THE LETTER TO THE DC OF THE CRAs.

  • Haha 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...