Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/Orange


eightcat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4111 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, I was wondering if anyone could help.

 

I received a letter about a week ago from Debt Mangers LTD stating they had been looking for a person with my name and to contact them, the usual phishing trip, which I ignored. Today I have received a letter headed Doorstep Visit with a threat to have someone call at my address unless I call them immediately. They claim I owe £728 to Arrow/Orange. I did have an Orange phone account, but not since October of 2007, and I cannot recall owing them anything. My main concern is that I live on a property that shares grounds with my landlord, and do not want debt collectors turning up, especially since no details of any money owing have been given.

 

Any advice on how to proceed?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't react in any way. Just check your credit record to see if this debt is on there.

 

The doorstep collectors are just s/employed people who they send lists out to and if they manage to gain payment or an arrangement, they earn a commission. They often don't visit and if they do, it will be a quick visit at any time. According to reports some will do the trick of having a parcel for Mr X and does he live here. They then say what the visit is really about.

 

I suspect that if you respond, you are more likely to be visited.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

 

I have checked my credit record, and nothing is showing. What concerns me is the fact that if they do come they will speak to my landlord, as we share the same grounds. Also, if the alleged debt is not showing on my credit report does that mean it is not existant? My credit report is in good standing right now and would like it to remain that way.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

 

I have checked my credit record, and nothing is showing. What concerns me is the fact that if they do come they will speak to my landlord, as we share the same grounds. Also, if the alleged debt is not showing on my credit report does that mean it is not existant? My credit report is in good standing right now and would like it to remain that way.

 

Many thanks

 

Sometimes debts are not entered on credit records in error. Perhaps the debt is older than 6 years, as debts drop off credit records after 6 years ?

 

If you are concerned about the landlord, you could just mention this in passing, by saying that you have had a letter from a debt collection agency about a debt that is not yours and you have checked your credit record which shows nothing. You think they have the wrong person, but wanted to let the landlord know, just in case they hear anything and you are not around to deal with it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its nice to see they have changed there fetish of collecting doorsteps to visiting them now:wink:

 

If you do get a doorstep visitor remember they are not bailiffs,never will be and can be told to do one!!

 

you do not need to talk to them just shut the door

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lodge a formal complaint to the OFT&TS about yet another childish clown outfit failing to trace debtors correctly.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lodge a formal complaint to the OFT&TS about yet another childish clown outfit failing to trace debtors correctly.

 

I am considering it actually. I can't see how they can send a phishing letter asking to confirm my identity, then just decide it for themselves and send another letter with potentially sensitive information - breach of DPA?

 

Should I write to them telling them to prove it and cease all contact until they can?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eightcat

I received exactly the same letters as you, from the samecompanies that you have mentioned, both of the letters arrived over a monthago.

Now this isn’t meant as advice but I did nothing with theletters and up until now, I have not received a “Visit” or any further lettersfrom these companies. I must admitthough, this hasn’t stopped me being paranoid every time a different car parksoutside my house and in a sort of weird way, I now get disappointed every timethe postie delivers the usual junk!

I have already posted my own thread on my situation. I have printed the Doorstep Visit letter fromthis site to hand to the Gorilla that may or (I think most likely) may notvisit. I also sent a SAR to the originalcreditor when this all kicked off and that should be back in the next couple ofweeks, hopefully that arrives before the Gorilla and I’ll then know if it is SB’dor not (Knowledge is power)!!!

Anyhow, I cannot guarantee that they won’t come knocking, Ijust thought that I’d just try and give you an insight.

I believe that by responding to they’re letters, that we’dbe playing into their hands, by not responding, I believe they are just movingonto they’re next victim.

I hope this reassures you, sorry for rambling.

QB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I write to them telling them to prove it and cease all contact until they can?

 

No, just ignore them, if you respond in any way they will think they have the right person and simply start to con you out of money you don't owe.

 

Just lodge the formal complaints, let them deal with it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello all.

 

I posted here toward the end of November for advice on a letter I had received from Debt Managers LTD regarding an orange debt they are collecting on behalf of Arrow.

 

The advice was to basically ignore, which I did and heard nothing until

 

I received another letter today from a company called Call Serve,

in very blunt terms stating that 'unless I have good reason not to, payment is required within 7 days.

 

Is ignoring still the best option?

 

I am quite happy to, I just don't want them trying to obtain a CCJ by default.

 

I have checked my credit ref, and nothing appears there,

and I have not been with Orange since Sept of 2007,

 

I don't remember any debt but was having personal problems at that time and cannot be sure.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all.

 

I posted here toward the end of November for advice on a letter I had received from Debt Managers LTD regarding an orange debt they are collecting on behalf of Arrow. The advice was to basically ignore, which I did and heard nothing until I received another letter today from a company called Call Serve, in very blunt terms stating that 'unless I have good reason not to, payment is required within 7 days. Is ignoring still the best option? I am quite happy to, I just don't want them trying to obtain a CCJ by default. I have checked my credit ref, and nothing appears there, and I have not been with Orange since Sept of 2007, I don't remember any debt but was having personal problems at that time and cannot be sure. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

If you phoned Orange customer services I suspect that they can provide the details on their systems. You should not need a reference number. They can probably find your details using your name and address at the time.

 

The debt not appearing on your credit record does not mean it is statute barred, as they may just not have noted the default. Anyway contact Orange to find out why there was any debt, if there was one.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

From previous advice, IMO I would still ignore, forget any notion of getting a CCJ, this will have been done within months of defaulting, or as soon as their efforts to collect had been exhausted.

 

Keep an eye on your credit file, and remember they have ZERO legal rights, knowledge or power to do anything, they are not bailiffs.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...