Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bank-Smart excessive charges & fees...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I'm new to this so bear with me :)

 

I've recently been contacted by mail by a company called Bank-Smart, which deals with recovering missold PPI from loans etc.

 

I signed their authorisation document, giving them the go ahead to proceed with my claim,

then things started unravelling over the past few weeks and

 

I found out, from reading other people's stories with BS, that Bank-Smart were involved with some really shady issues

where they charge ludicrous amounts of money for services they don't even provide,

and that they can be nasty when people dispute the fees they are asking for...

which is what is happening to me now :(

 

I have contacted the ministry of justice, the trading standards, the financial ombudsman, the claims regulations,

 

I've alerted various media organisations, such as Which? and Watchdog, and am about to go visit my local Citizens Advice Bureau for more help on the problem.

 

Has anyone else had the misfortune of dealing with these people?

 

I'm trying to find a way to get them off my back before they start turning nasty,

 

as they are already talking about taking the whole thing to court etc :(

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old is this?

 

have they actually DONe anything for you yet?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's happening now,

 

I signed their 3rd party agreement document and sent that to them,

and asked for a copy of their T&C because there wasn't one for me to keep and refer to in their initial mail,

but that T&C never found its way to my letterbox, strangely enough...

 

when they wrote to give me access to my account on their website on October 17th,

it showed on the website that the claim was created on the 4th of October, and still no T&C,

but they included another form where they asked me to give details of other loans I might have taken in the past,

 

I started to feel uneasy about the way it was all going because I had only asked them to look into one loan,

and there they were asking about mortgages, car finance and all kind of other stuff,

 

I looked them up on google and read dozens of horror stories about their practises..

 

I emailed to cancel the claim but nothing happened and I didn't hear from them for another couple of weeks.

 

.. I thought that was the end of it,

 

then another lot of paperwork came for me to fill on October 31st,

asking me to give them more details of the loan I initially instructed them to claim for, like the account number etc.

 

.. obviously I didn't send that back either and I went back to their website and tried to cancel again,

and that's when suddenly my status changed on the website and I saw they were asking me for £92 something..

 

. I've been disputing it since,

 

they are arguing that the claim took effect the day I signed the document not when it said it was created according to the info on their website..

. there was no mention of any cancellation policy in their original papework.

 

.. sorry for the lengthy message, I'm just blurting the story out as I remember it!

 

In short, they've timed everything to make sure I couldn't meet their supposed 14-day cooling off deadline,

so they could charge me on the grounds of "works carried out"..

 

. and now, because I have disputed the fee they are asking and told them it's their choice to take the matter further if they aren't happy,

 

they have blocked my access to their website and they have sent me a threatening email to say that because I have instructed them to start proceedings

and I have made no attempt to pay the debt, they will start the proceedings.

 

.. they said in their email that the court will contact me directly to let me know how much they will be claiming for,

and that it's going to include a further £150 on legal fees, court order etc etc, plus warrant and enforcement fees where applicable providing a successful judgement is obtained..

 

. are these guys for real?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let them start proceedings then... easily defended...not that they will. I hope you have not provided banking details or they may help themselves to the fees.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for the support... I'm feeling quite stressed about this actually, well WAS feeling stressed but now I've referred it to the OFT, financial ombudsman, phoned the ministry of justice about it, and I've started mentioning the story to the media, explained the whole thing to someone at my local CAB today and she said I have a pretty good case anyway, still won't rest till this is over...

 

Andy: no, all they have is the name of the company I took that loan from, no account number or any other details for it, and they haven't got my bank details, thank God!

 

Today, I also phoned up the lender I had the loan with, to find out if anyone had contacted them regarding claiming PPI, but they haven't heard anything, so at least I know that Bank-Smart haven't done any "work" in that area (hardly surprising!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing to fear then...take time have a read around the PPI forums...everything you need to know is at your finger tips with a wealth of experienced posters to advise along the way...do it yourself.. don't pay anyone, the process is so simple.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I had a good read at the postings a few days ago, you guys talk a lot of sense (that's why I decided to join here!) and it's a comfort to know that you're not alone when something like this falls on your head! Funnily enough, I found out that my loan actually included PPI so I am due a refund soon, apparently, and all it took was one phone call! Thanks again for your help Andy and Dx :) Will keep you guys posted on what happens next with those people :x

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

yea read those emails carefully

 

it does not say WILL

 

if ,but, might, could . instructed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...