Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check and if I still am,  I am going to discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What would you do if your employer is fiddling................. .


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Im curious as to know what you guys would do in this situation...

 

Working for a company where you cover many different customers/contracts which have set time to be completed as per the contract agreement. ie... 3 hours fix..ect. In some cases your employer owes the customers/contracts fees if a job is completed outside the contracted fix time.

 

What would you do if your employer tells you to be inaccurate to deceive the customers/contracts by manually fiddling the figures to defraud/deceive customers?

 

Let it go and get on with it to make your employer happy

Or

Raise the matter with your line manager or possibly formally with HR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now thats a difficult situation.

 

If it were a manager who was asking me to falesify data to make money for the company I would probably spill the beans

 

if I was confident the company woud back me.

 

But, as its the actual company who are blantantly fiddling the data sheets to defraud the customers its a completely different kettle of fish.

 

It would take a brave person to do this as I'm sure your head would definately be on the chopping block.

 

I dont think they would appreciate a member of staff bringing to their attention they are fiddling !!!

 

In the real world they should be 'outed' , but I think if you were to tell them you are not happy with what they are doing you would be out of a job.

 

Its not right at all but the weight of the company would outweigh you .

 

Its a sorry state of affairs when corruption outweighs honesty !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No you need to ensure the company has a Whistle Blowing Policy in place which legally it should and if you raise the issue pointing out that you are raising this concern under the Whistle Blowing Policy its Protected Disclosure.

 

But if you are going to do this you really need to be sure you have the evidence to back it up and not just he said she said as its hearsay have you recorded this individual saying this to yourselves at all and a paper trail.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No you need to ensure the company has a Whistle Blowing Policy in place which legally it should and if you raise the issue pointing out that you are raising this concern under the Whistle Blowing Policy its Protected Disclosure.

 

But if you are going to do this you really need to be sure you have the evidence to back it up and not just he said she said as its hearsay have you recorded this individual saying this to yourselves at all and a paper trail.

 

I have a recording of an individual(not management) telling me to break the rules 'as per management have told them to'.

 

Also in black and white i have taken a snapshot of the companys system which clearly states different actions/timing to what i actually did.

 

This happens weekly and has done for the past 2 years, ever since they employed a very dodgey management. Others have raised the issues but the company reject it and claim the person who raised the issue was misunderstood or had made a mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I would still say to be careful as the recording Management could deny this instruction and state the employee done this of their own accord so to speak.

 

As for taking snapshots you would also need to be careful as this would be done during your working period and any IT Security Policy they have in place as you are taking screenshot on a company computer in company time of company documents so to speak.

 

Please check your contract of employment very carefully, Any Policy and Procedure on IT Security or Electronic Communications and Confidentiality Policy and Procedure.

 

I am not trying to put you off at all but trying to make you aware of the possible ramifications on yourself and that if you do you need to be prepared for that

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there a parent company here?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would look for another job before spilling the beans and whikle I Was still employed fill in my work correctly and then its up to those higher up if they later change records, make sure you have done nothing wrong.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is all about what you feel comfortable with.

 

If you are happy to falsify documents in the companies favour and with management knowledge of you doing so then continue as you have been.

 

But I suspect you would not have raised this question if you did feel comfortable with what is going on.

 

Personally, I would raise the matter with my line manager first via email and get a written response on what s/he expects from you in the given circumstances. If the direction from your manager is to falsify the documents in favour of the company then I would definitely make a protected disclosure.

 

In the off chance that this ever got out, lets say a customer realised what had been done and decided to take further/legal action you can bet your bottom dollar senior management will drop you right in it and do everything possible to protect the company.

 

IS a very difficult position to find yourself in and only you can decide what action to take that feels right for you.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...