Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

They are interviewing my mum under caution - please help!


mollies_mum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I know that there are a lot of posts about this but I've been reading them all weekend and can't find one similar to my mum's situation. I understand what happens and the reasons these interviews take place but would like some advice on how we should go ahead.

Basically my mum collects her state pension and claims housing benefit and council tax benefit. She has never claimed any benefits before as she has worked her whole life. When she retired she had been suffering from depression/anxiety so our family friend was dealing with her redundancy options and secured her a payout of £20,000 and monthly payments of £250. The £20,000 was paid out to people she owed money to within one week of it being paid into her account.

When she made her housing beneft/council tax claim this redundancy money/pension hadn't been sorted yet, as soon as it was I sent a change of circumstnces form with a covering letter off the the council. The next month her payments were reduced so we assumed that this was why although there is no confirmation of this in her paperwork (she has copies of everything)

My mum then had 2 separate visits from the council about pension credits to check her bank statements and to discuss her pension and oher finances.

This was 18 months ago, then on Friday she received an Interview Under Caution letter. I have spent all weekend going through her paperwork wth a fine tooth comb and the notes from the second visit say that she told them that she doesn't have a private pension which of course she does. I think that this is where the problem lies.

My mum is now having panic attacks, can't sleep and is convinced that she is going to prison. It's awful.

I am going to the interview with her but I'm not sure how involved I am allowed to be and I am also going to arrange for a solicitor to come with us. Because of my mums health I am also dealing with numerous creditors on her behalf.

My mum has never been in trouble before and at the time of all this she was on a lot of medication and was off work for months with depression and anxiety, we have all the copies of sick notes for this. She said that during the home visits they asked her lots of questions and she found it all very confusing so that is when she thinks that she told them the wrong information. She said that they kept going on about different types of pensions, credits and benefits and she has obviously said the wrong thing.

I'm not even sure she will cope with the interview on Friday let alone waiting to see if they prosecute. She says that she can't cope with the shame of it all. She has never claimed anything in her whole life.

I have told her that I will pay the money back for her so not to worry about that but it is the fact that she may be prsoecuted for this that is scaring her to death.

Does anyone have any advice or ideas what might happen?

Sorry it's so long.

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have not been in this position, but I would think that they are wanting to find out the exact position. I can't see them taking this further, unless they consider that deliberate false information was provided. There may be an overpayment issue that needs to be sorted out. They interview under caution just because if any information comes out that they believe merits a prosecution. they can take it forward.

 

Wise to have legal representation and to record the interview.

 

Make sure that she has paperwork about the £20k being paid to people she owed money to and has receipts from the people to confirm that they have recieved it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. The people that she owed money to were me and my brother, not companies. I've had a look through her bank statements and they clearly show that cheques were issued to us shortly after she received the money. Do you think this will this be a problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just looked what 'deprivation of capital' is and yes you're right it could very well be seen as that. However I did tell them in the change of circumstances form that my mum had received this money so we were upfront about it. The thing is, our family have never EVER claimed any benefits so this is all new to us and unfortunately it looks like we have made some mistakes, albeit innocent ones. I'm just so worried for my mum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. The people that she owed money to were me and my brother, not companies. I've had a look through her bank statements and they clearly show that cheques were issued to us shortly after she received the money. Do you think this will this be a problem?

 

I think you will have to explain this and may be have something drawn up legally to cover this off. Perhaps the Solicitor can advise on this. If you had lent your Mum £20k between you, for your Mum to pay debts or some other legal obligation and you can demonstrate this with documentation, then maybe it won't be an issue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I know that there are a lot of posts about this but I've been reading them all weekend and can't find one similar to my mum's situation. I understand what happens and the reasons these interviews take place but would like some advice on how we should go ahead.

Basically my mum collects her state pension and claims housing benefit and council tax benefit. She has never claimed any benefits before as she has worked her whole life. When she retired she had been suffering from depression/anxiety so our family friend was dealing with her redundancy options and secured her a payout of £20,000 and monthly payments of £250. The £20,000 was paid out to people she owed money to within one week of it being paid into her account.

When she made her housing beneft/council tax claim this redundancy money/pension hadn't been sorted yet, as soon as it was I sent a change of circumstnces form with a covering letter off the the council. The next month her payments were reduced so we assumed that this was why although there is no confirmation of this in her paperwork (she has copies of everything)

My mum then had 2 separate visits from the council about pension credits to check her bank statements and to discuss her pension and oher finances.

This was 18 months ago, then on Friday she received an Interview Under Caution letter. I have spent all weekend going through her paperwork wth a fine tooth comb and the notes from the second visit say that she told them that she doesn't have a private pension which of course she does. I think that this is where the problem lies.

My mum is now having panic attacks, can't sleep and is convinced that she is going to prison. It's awful.

I am going to the interview with her but I'm not sure how involved I am allowed to be and I am also going to arrange for a solicitor to come with us. Because of my mums health I am also dealing with numerous creditors on her behalf.

My mum has never been in trouble before and at the time of all this she was on a lot of medication and was off work for months with depression and anxiety, we have all the copies of sick notes for this. She said that during the home visits they asked her lots of questions and she found it all very confusing so that is when she thinks that she told them the wrong information. She said that they kept going on about different types of pensions, credits and benefits and she has obviously said the wrong thing.

I'm not even sure she will cope with the interview on Friday let alone waiting to see if they prosecute. She says that she can't cope with the shame of it all. She has never claimed anything in her whole life.

I have told her that I will pay the money back for her so not to worry about that but it is the fact that she may be prsoecuted for this that is scaring her to death.

Does anyone have any advice or ideas what might happen?

Sorry it's so long.

Thanks in advance

 

Hi. I have a few questions first if that is OK.

 

You said that you sent a change of circumstances form and covering letter - did these detail both the lump sum payment and the monthly payments?

 

You said that your Mum received two visits where her bankstatements were checked - does she remember if copies were taken? And do the bankstatements that were checked show the lump sum, and monthly payments?

 

You said your mum's HB was reduced after the change of circs was notified - did she receive a new award letter around this time - if so does it show the new pension?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I have a few questions first if that is OK.

 

You said that you sent a change of circumstances form and covering letter - did these detail both the lump sum payment and the monthly payments?

 

You said that your Mum received two visits where her bankstatements were checked - does she remember if copies were taken? And do the bankstatements that were checked show the lump sum, and monthly payments?

 

You said your mum's HB was reduced after the change of circs was notified - did she receive a new award letter around this time - if so does it show the new pension?

 

The change of circumstances form did detail both the lump sum and monthly payments however I can't find a new award notice from around that time to confirm this eventhough her payments reduced after this.

I'm not sure if copies were taken of her bank statements and what they showed - sorry. I did ask my mum but she is in such a state that she can't really remember what happened and when.

She's convinced that she is going to prison, can someone please tell me if this is likely?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prison very unlikely, unless this is a second offence or a deliberate fraud, where she had gained a significant amount of money. A case regarding someone I am aware of who fraudulently claimed nearly £50k worth of benefits, ended with them getting a community punnishment order.

 

If she has always given accurate information to her local council/DWP and has not hidden anything, then I cannot see that she has done anything wrong.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The change of circumstances form did detail both the lump sum and monthly payments however I can't find a new award notice from around that time to confirm this eventhough her payments reduced after this.

I'm not sure if copies were taken of her bank statements and what they showed - sorry. I did ask my mum but she is in such a state that she can't really remember what happened and when.

She's convinced that she is going to prison, can someone please tell me if this is likely?

Thanks

 

I think it is highly unlikely that a prison sentence would even be an option in this case.

 

Firstly, request a delay in the IUC due to your Mum's mental health. In the meantime, make a SAR to the local authority for everything they have on her claim. If there is even a notation on your mum's records that the interviews who saw her looked at the bankstatements (and the bankstatements showed the payments), then even if they claim not to have received the change of circs form, there is no way that criminal fraud can be charged as even providing bankstatements counts as notifyiing the authority of the change of circs. If the statements that were looked at also show the payments to you and your brother, and the lump sum payment itself, the this also counts as notification. getting this info from a SAR, could prevent your Mum in her vulnerable state having to go to an IUC at all (obviously if the SAR shows the right info). The SAR should also show why her award reduced.

Edited by estellyn

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...