Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/408156-cabotnolans-spc-claim-old-next-cat-debtclaim-dismissed/page/4/#comments https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/404240-arrowshoos-spc-old-newday-aqua-credit-card-debt-claim-dismissed-no-dn/page/4/#comments default notice win  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/407490-meiii-cabotnolans-spc-claim-old-yorkshire-bank-loan-2nd-claim-dismissed/  
    • It follows a public backlash after stores were told they could not sell items such as clothes. View the full article
    • With regard to your question on post 207 if you bring in the points that I made on the validity of the contract they are supposed to have with Peel holdings then mention that there are already doubts about the validity of the contracts that are being used by the PPCs and the OPS is a classic example. Once you are on there you should then try and get your other point in after that.   if it is in connection with the extra charge of £60 remind the Judge that the charge has been defined by many Court across England that the charge is an abuse of process which was covered in PE v Beavis at point 198    " The charge has to be and is set at a level which enables managers to recover the costs of operating the scheme"  IE the £100 charge covers all their expenses so nothing should be added.   as their WS claims an extra £60 that could be judged as perjurious since it is an additional sum that should be known by VCS and the author of the WS as a double recovery. Especially as they have already lost in Court for the same reason.   Another cause to prove that they do not comply with their Code of Conduct. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/CamScanner%2008-05-2020%2016.34.59.pdf  Byelaws are statutory not arbitrary as their WS said on no .42 .   Best of Luck.   The above URL does not work but this one does http://forums.National Consumer Service.com/index.php?showtopic=133001    [20.1 is where  VCS  lost then 20.2 where they appealed and lost again . But read the whole thread as it may help you in other ways too.
    • Sian Williams from Indonesia takes us through her week during the coronavirus pandemic. View the full article
    • stop doing nolans job for them... there are numerous threads here in the same forum yours is in     no DN info to follow   dx    
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Garage replaced lifetime filter with inferior - advice


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2886 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I had my vehicle serviced by a garage. It is, or was fitted with a K&N air filter - which is a lifetime filter which just needs to be cleaned. It's supposed to give increased performance & mpg.

 

I checked it today and found it to be replaced by a throw away filter :mad2: so I have a £48 filter missing and was no doubt charged for the inferior part they replaced it with.

 

K&N filters have been around for along time and are clearly marked up, so I assume a young inexperienced mechanic/trainee was doing the service and hadn't been told to look out for them.

 

I've emailed the garage today to see their response - has anyone come across this before?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you say, K&N have been around a long time. If they really were that good, don't you think the car makers would fit them as standard especially if they measurably increased the mpg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a k&n filter. I think they are over rated.

 

Did you tell them not to change it? Did you want them to clean it instead?.

 

It was probably dirty and not performing as well as the oem one that replaced it.

 

As for mpg increase its negligible at best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would guess that with the number of air filters manufacturers fit to vehicles, the extra cost would soon add up, not to mention the manufacturer makes a profit on every filter it sells whereas fit a third party manufacturers filter and it is the third party making the profit.

 

Likewise why do they make a 2 litre, 2.5 and 3 litre diesel engine for the same vehicle - why not just make the 3 litre - after all it is more fuel efficient because it it ticking over to do the same work the 2 litre has to work hard to do.

 

And why on the 2.5 litre engine do they choose to give three power options - 90hp; 115hp or 125hp - it's the same size engine - why not just make it the best that it can be?

 

Kenlowe cooling fans are another money saver - again a third party.

 

But my question was if anyone had had a garage remove lifetime parts and replace with inferior, not how they feel these parts perform.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Changing air filter is part of the service. If you didn't tell them not to then it would be changed unless it was clearly an after market part such as a cone or honey comb filter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Changing air filter is part of the service. If you didn't tell them not to then it would be changed unless it was clearly an after market part such as a cone or honey comb filter.

 

I can't agree with that. I would never have allowed one of my mechanics to replace an after-fit filter (or any modification) with a paper one unless I had specific instructions from the customer. Let us know what the email reply says KVF.

 

Are we talking a bolt on chrome and wire job or a paper element replacement that is in the original filter box?

If in the box, then I would agree with the above. How would they know unless you told them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

K&N filters aren't a new to the market item that motor engineers wouldn't be aware of, they have been around a LONG time and I wouldn't have expected it to be changed unless they had checked with me first - they are designed to be cleaned not thrown away and replaced with paper ones.

 

It's not paper, it's a lifetime replacement for the paper one, clearly marked as being K&N - I wouldn't expect it to be removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a lifetime replacement for the paper one so it would naturally be in the filter box.

Edited by KVF
I have removed a sentence added to this post presumably by admin to make it look like it was posted by me.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oil and filter changes are usually given to the junior to do. He probably thought it was a big brillo pad so changed it.

 

Hang on until you get a reply to your email, should be tomorrow latest, and let us know what he says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I think is likely, a junior or apprentice was given the task, but given that these type of filters have been around for a long time and are clearly marked then I feel either the garage has failed to drum into their staff that they need to check or the person changing it didn't pay attention at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Why not ask for it back and if that's not possible ask for a contribution towards a replacement.

 

 

If they still have it I will be happy to have it back, but one doesn't expect to have to check up on the work done by a garage and so I didn't look at the time. I have a six monthly diary note to check the filter and this is when I saw it wasn't there any longer

Link to post
Share on other sites
Why not ask for it back and if that's not possible ask for a contribution towards a replacement.

 

 

I've emailed the garage today to see their response

 

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to go with Conniff on this one. k&n stuff is often proved to be a waste of money. Garage who changed it could actually be doing you a favour in the long term. Tests I have seen done with this type of filter show no long term benefit whatsoever but because of the name it is percieved they are better when in reallity they don't do anything more or give any advantage. And as conniff rightly points out if they had an advantage then they would be fitted as standard anyway.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of whether the filter is of any benefit, it cost the OP £48 and is life long filter and any trained mechanic would know that and simply wash it and replace the filter. I bet that the garage never charged the OP the apprentice hourly rate and that the OP paid the hourly rate for a fully trained mechanic to do the work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any trained mechanic would get rid of the K&N rubbish and put it back to design intent which seems the have happened. So fair play to the garage it seems. K&N make some quite wild claims without concrete backup!! There is only rate applicable in workshops and that is the hourly rate. Doesn't matter who does it, it's a set hourly rate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the garage were instructed to complete a service, they'd have done so in line with manufacturer guidelines, or gone down the basic service route of; Oil, filter, air filter.

 

In replacing the air filter for a standard one, there's a 100:1 chance they've prevented you from having your insurance voided as a K&N performance filter has been known to be called a "Performance Enhancing Modification", regardless of the fact they do sod all apart from make the under-hood area look untidy and "Barried" with.

 

Seriously, if they've still got it in the bin, ask for it back if it matters. If not, consider them as doing you a favour by ridding your car of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...