Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Big Fight With NAT WEST ***WON***


Deller
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 718
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I skipped the SAR stage too seeing as though I had all my statements, it doesn't seem to have caused my claim any problems so far. :rolleyes:

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

God they string this out don't they, its over three weeks now since I filed my claim with MCOL and havn't heard a peep from them.

I can't understand why they don't just pay up earlier and save Mr Higley a hell of a lot of ink and paper. His desk must be swamped in claims!! HEE! HEE!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest screwloose

From what I've been reading they seem to be dragging it on a bit for a lot people and really running to the deadlines, but HEY, I'm in it for the long haul!!

 

You don't seem too far off now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just popped home to check the post....still nothing, I know they've still got a week to get their defence in but I'm so impatient!!!

 

HURRY UP COBBETTS!!!!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have been in contact with the now legedary Higley.

 

After prelim was fobbed off I sent LBA, he replied he couldn't add anything more constructive and had alerted his lawyers, thanking me for advising of my intentions.

 

Send online claim today and have claim number, looks like I'll be waiting about a month then!

 

ZZZZZZ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Grazel, you're not too far behind me then, Oh and trust me they'll make you wait!!:x :x

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest screwloose

Hello there deller, I too havn't had any news yet, its a long old waiting game aint it!!

 

Will keep you informed of any progress!;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Long! Its starting to feel like forever!!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lodged my MCOL today, £3300 plus interest. Interesting to see how the next few weeks are likely to pan out. Quite alot of inactivity.......

My advice has hardly any legal foundation whatsoever, however you never know it it might just work!

:cool:

 

NatWest Prelim 07.10.206

LBA 21.10.2006

MCOL 30.10.2006

Acknowledgment of Service 06.11.2006

Offer of approx 50% £2200.00 22.11.2006

Full settlement £4500 received 03.01.2007

Smile settled in full

Barclaycard settled in full

RBS Worldwide settled in full

Lloyds TSB settled in full £750.00

Lloyds TSB settled in Full £275.00 11.04.2007

Lloyds TSB business account £1376.00 AQ filed

Lloyds TSB Business account settled in full 21.05.07

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they only have to the 7th to answer if they will defend my claim

18/10/06 sent lba for current account

18/10/06 claim issued against NatWest for £2,495.00

30/09/06 O'Neill V NatWest - declined offer of £1216.00 sent responce to settlement letter

30/09/06 O'neill v Woolwich plc mortgage account sent Data Protection Act notice for not replying

30/09/06 Oneill v citifinancial sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

30/09/06 O'neill V Capital One sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

 

If u can do it, SO CAN I!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There seems to be lot of us at the same stage, and looks like we're all being pushed to the wire!!:x

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well still nothing from Cobbetts, they've only got a week left to get their defence in or I'll be entering judgement. Whats the bet they get their defence in right at the last minute, that seems to be the norm at the moment!!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting a bit worried the closer the deadline for their defence gets. When I submitted my claim with MCOL I was a little hasty and don't think I gave enough detail, I have since forwarded a copy of my schedule to MCOL, Cobbetts and Nat West asking them all to attach that copy to my claim. Now after some heavy reading through other peoples threads I'm still a little concerned that this might not be enough.

Would it be OK to post (to MCOL and Cobbetts) an amended copy of my 'Particulars of Claim' and ask them to attach it to my file?

If so, will this have any affect on my claim with regards to timescales, deadlines or costs?

 

Help would be much appreciated!!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to amend your claim you will need to complete an N244 form and send it to the Court to request amendment at a cost of £35.00 and then the court will decide whether or not to accept the amendment.

 

As long as you had the legal justification for your claim, along with the account details and schedule of charges, I don't think you need worry. Can you put your POC on your thread so we can see if you have reason to worry or not.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of my claim were:

 

I am claiming back all bank charges paid on my account for the past six years as I now understand that the regime of fees which have applied to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent consumer regulations.

The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 18th September 2000 to 1st October 2006 of £xxx.

 

I have since forwarded a copy of my schedule which does state my account number, and you may have noticed I havn't included the daily rate in my claim as at the time of submitting I was unable to work it out, I was also unaware of the template for the POC.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right to be concerned. You have not stated the legal basis for your claim. You need to amend it and I suggest you do it along the lines of the POC in the bank templates library.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I'm even more confused, have just phoned the help desk at MCOL regarding making an amendmant on my POC and the guy said that it would not be a problem but would mean starting the claim procedure again. He then asked if I really needed to change it as all the info seemed to be there and that my schedule had been attached to my claim which showed my account details. I explained to him that I was a bit hasty and that I didn't think the wording of my POC covered the legal basis of my claim. He said that it shouldn't be a problem as when my claim went to court I could show all details regarding my claim then.

 

Help, what now???:confused: :confused: :confused:

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any help with previous!!

 

PLEASE!!!:!:

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strictly speaking, I suppose, you would not need to amend the claim until such a point as either the Judge or the Defendant made an issue of it.

 

It is possible, however, to pre-empt this scenario and amend it now - Caro is correct above in detailing the form etc....

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There may be a way round this.

 

Almost certainly NatWest will put in a defence which would probably suggest that your claim has no merit - they may even ask the court to strike out your claim. Although there is equally a chance they won't notice, and just file the same standard defence they have been using for all the recent claims.

 

However, as soon as they file their defence, you are entitled to issue a "Response to the Defence". This would be sent to the court, and to the defendant. In that you can include all the necessary legal background to your claim, and argue against any attempt to go for a strike-out.

 

The CPR does provide a means for claims to be struck out where, "the statement of case discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing or defending the claim". However, your claim does state that the charges "are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent consumer regulations". Even though you have not given the exact legislation, this should be enough to keep your claim alive.

 

Please remember though, that this is just my opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice guys, and your comments (Alan) have put my mind at ease a little. After taking on board all of your advice and some serious reading through other threads I thought it might be a good idea to fax an updated copy of my particulars to Cobbetts along with another copy of my schedule, (I noticed Martin advised this in someone elses thread), this can then be attached to my claim and hopefully resolve the matter.

 

If this fails then there is the option ( as Alan suggested) to issue a response to the defence, and like you say I have hopefully put just enough to keep the claim alive.

 

Fingures crossed all will be well.

 

Big thanks again. ;-) ;-) ;-)

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh no. i have been reading threads on these pages now for some time, never feeling the need to ask for advice. but here i am. i have two claims going on at the moment, one for myself, and one i am overseeing on behalf of my fiance. mine is with barclays and his with natwest. the thing is, they have both been sent off to court now and both claims have been acknowledged. i filled out mine first (rather hastily) with "claiming the bank charges levied against my account over the last six years. this is unlawful at common law and unfair as set by the OFT. This includes £1020 of bank charges and £236.27 of interest as a direct result of these charges" i realised this was probably too hasty when i filled out the next one and put (quoting the template letter) "claiming bank charges levied from my account over the past three years......unlawful at common law......OFT who reported on 5th april 2006......" then i go on to give dates from and to and the total amount. now i have read this thread and i am sorry to infringe on your thread with my problems but now i feel like i have done it wrong too! i havent heard anything apart from that the two have been acknowledged, and intend to make a defence. could they throw mine out for my lack of info at this stage??? :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shouldn't worry too much, I've been stressing about it all day, but with all this helpful advice and hopefully more to come I'm very hopefull of getting through this.

 

Keep watching my thread marieclaire, I'm sure any advice I get on this matter is surely going to help you too!!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...