Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds credit card with PPI and Marlin Europe


Nath123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3927 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'll aplogise now for such a long winded post.

 

In 2006 I had a credit card with Lloyds with PPI, I went to claim and I couldnt because I was self employed. Now I started proceedings back then to claim back this PPI, after a long drawn out process I gave in and never heard from Lloyds again.

 

As I got wiser and older I realised they had infact just defaulted the account on my credit file. I wasn't best impressed and contacted Lloyds to continue trying to get my PPI back and any charges squashed.

 

However Lloyds was now telling me that they had no information what so ever regarding this account, they searched my name, my address and any linked accounts to my current account. They said it didnt exist.

 

I left it again until one day I received a letter regarding PPI and outstanding balances, it basically stating if i claim PPI they will take it off the balance of what I owe them. This letter however had the account number on it.

 

I've filed for the PPI back and receieved a letter confirming they are looking into it. I even received a phonecall asking me further information about my self employment, they wanted to know how long before the card was I self employed. Roughly 12 Months.

 

I receieved a letter on the 10th of Oct, this just acknoledged that I had made a complaint.

 

Now I have just receieved a letter from Lloyds explaining they have sold the debt on followed by one from Marlin Europe explaining that they are now the people to speak to regarding this debt.

 

I rang Marlin in a bit of a rage explaining the situation, the bloke on the other end seemed to know is job very well and pressed the right buttons to push me into further rage. :-x

 

I finished the call and I rang lloyds, lloyds said they had sent me out a final decision on the 20th of Oct which I never received.

 

Marlin are chasing the exact amount as Lloyds defaulted me on so it looks as if I have been unsuccesful in claiming back the PPI. Since contacting Marlin they have rang me several times both on my mobile and on my business line.

 

Any ideas on what to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

NEVER EVER phone a spoofing DCA

 

esp marlin

 

they are NOT bailiffs & can do little to you.

 

does the PPI outweigh the OD balance?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure of the amount of the PPI as I have never been able to request such information with lloyds being unable to give me the account number.

 

I very much doubt it.

 

Thanks for the response greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ithink the next move will be to SAR lloyds

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still not received my letter with the final decision, rang them again and was told it could take seven to ten days. Today is the ninth and still nothing.

 

Receieved numerous phonecalls and letters from Marlin, I simply said I do not wish to speak to them regarding this account as I have yet to finish communications with Lloyds regarding it.

 

Also receieved the SAR back from Lloyds explaining due to me not having a iopen account with them I can only go into a branch to obtain such information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

not heard of them pulling this dodge in this s ituation before

 

i've heard they usually deliver to a branch of your choice

then you go in with ID to get it.

 

so they are still going to give the SAR info though?

 

marlin..correct, just tell them to go away.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe a mis communication between me and the "Mrs", I'll have to double check when I get home but your probably right about collecting with id from a branch.

 

I'm naffed off with not having received the final decision yet, they explained they send 2nd class but I send items out daily using 2nd class and have yet to see any of my items take 7 - 10 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems you was right dx100uk, they returned the cheque with a covering letter and another form to request to send it to a branch of my choice.

 

One thing I find strange is, I sent the cheque payable to blank as I wasnt sure who to make it payable to. They have returned it but scribbled Halifax across where you would write the payees name.

 

Odd!

 

Nathan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no final decision letter from Lloyds, been on the phone again this morning and asked them whats going on? 10th October first letter was sent out, 20th November second letter sent out and I'm yet to receieve any. I asked her could she email me the letter she said no but was willing to tell me what it said.

 

The letter states not enough evidence to issue me any kind of refund and that I should contact the FO.

 

:(

 

Edit) Still awaiting response from the SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a letter from Lloyds regarding the SAR, they have aknowledged they have all the information and I should receive what I have requested by the 14th of January, they have also stated if I require statements to get in touch?

 

Surely they dont think I just want to know what products I've had from them for £10?

 

Still waiting on the final response letter too for the ppi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

everyone has a right to reclaimmis-sold PPI

 

i take it they say their processes were correct

 

std temple reply

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go thru the rejection letter point by point

 

look for customer/coms log entries to confirn what they are saying IS correct

 

i bet its not.

 

might be an idea to post up the fob-off letter.

 

though if you look at other lloyds PPI claim here in this forum

 

i bet its the same.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri should have posted instructions

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates. {DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN]

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites [http://docupub.com/pdfconvert/]

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

i'e Default notice dd-mm-yyyy

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason it wont let me edit the page. Ill just upload it here...

 

lloyds-1_zps03e7ed3a.jpg

 

I've got the application form and I've got the credit checks.

 

One thing I have noticed in the credit checks are the reason codes on the checks are not listed in the information booklet listing all the reason codes. There are 3 applications in total

 

1, £1000 Loan, Decision Refer, 045 & 080. Employment Retired 99years 99months Income £0

2, £1500 Loan, Decision Refer, 045. Employment Employed Unknown Income £0

3, £2000 CC, Decision Accept, 601. Employement Unkown 99years 99Months Income £10400

 

All seems a bit odd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow the guide post 20 here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is that X pre typed?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely didn't enter it you can see the state of my hand writing. I'll have to double check to see if it is pre entered or the member of staff entered it.

 

It says the ppi terms are on the application but I don't see them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is your reason

 

pre ticked BOX.

 

end off

 

they cant fight that.

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...