Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

THREE demanding I pay £190 for calling their Customer Services!


StephJ
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I'm glad I found this site! Hope someone can help.

 

Basically, for over a year, Three have been hassling me to pay £233 for calls incurred in Morocco last year. They've been sending debt collectors etc.... Most of this - 64 minutes = £190 to be exact, was due to calls to Three Customer Services when I was asking them to sort out my line which was not receiving texts from a Moroccan number. They took over a year to send me itemised bill - which just landed on my doormat this week. However, their website says that they cap all roaming costs to £49 for their customers. So why did they let me run the bill to £233? I am writing to them with this question, and also saying I'm consulting an expert. Can anyone help, please, with any more insight, or point me to an expert? Fyi, the Ombudsman said that they will only intervene if/ when there is a deadlock...

 

Quick response much appreciated. Thank you!

 

StephJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the cap apply to all roaming costs? Or only EU roaming costs? Most of these caps and limits tend to only apply within the EU (as that's where the mobile operators have basically been forced to cap these things).

 

It's also normal for the Ombudsman to only intervene when there is a deadlock. You'll need to ask Three to issue a Deadlock letter. If they refuse the Ombudsman can still intervene, but only after 8 weeks from the time you opened the complaint with Three.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the cap apply to all roaming costs? Or only EU roaming costs? Most of these caps and limits tend to only apply within the EU (as that's where the mobile operators have basically been forced to cap these things).

 

It's also normal for the Ombudsman to only intervene when there is a deadlock. You'll need to ask Three to issue a Deadlock letter. If they refuse the Ombudsman can still intervene, but only after 8 weeks from the time you opened the complaint with Three.

 

Hi and thanks for your reply. Much appreciated. This is an extract from their website: ".... We've also set up a worldwide data roaming limit of £49 per month to stop you spending too much. We'll send you texts to let you know when you've reached 80% and 95% of this £49 limit." I did not receive any such text.

 

I have sent my letter today quoting the above and asking them to give me time to consider the bill (I've received yet another letter from a debt collector) and also to tell me what damage they may have done to my credit status. Good idea about a deadlock letter. I'll do that when they write back. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You will probably find they ignore a request for a deadlock letter. Customer services staff probably don't know what it is, or understand their industry rules. It is a requirement to issue one when a dispute becomes deadlocked and the matter can then be referred to the Ombudsman for adjudication. Unfortunately the latter requires a 8 week period before action will be taken irrespective of whether a deadlock has been agreed. In the meantime they will continue to pursue you by whatever means. You can write to the debt collectors explaining that you dispute the debt and asking that they refer back to their client, but they may ignore it.

They will probably put a default on your credit rating with one of the 3 rating agencies, Equifax, Experion or CallCredit, unfortunately you won't know which and will have to check all three. This can be done quite easily as they are required by law to provide a basic personal credit report upon request and payment of a fee of £2. Apply for this in writing, their addresses are on their websites. You can also get online access to your own credit report on payment of a larger subscription, but sometimes the agencies have a free trial offer for a month which you can take out and cancel quite quickly. You may have difficulty in getting any defaults removed because you do owe money, only disputing the amount, but they don't last for ever (3 or 5 yrs, see agencies websites).

You must remember that helplines and customer services people have almost no training and are almost completely ignorant of the rules and legal requirements of the business in which they are working. They will also refuse to give their full names and think they can phone and write to Joe Public making threats and demands for money safe in their anonymity. I suggest you do everything in writing from the start, and refuse to talk to them on the phone, so that you can produce written evidence later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hector, thanks very much for your response. You are right. They replied to my letter but no mention of deadlock. They said they will stop the debt collectors letters and gave me till early Jan to pay up. They also said the £49 cap is for certain services and I was not in credit - which I think is a lie as there is no mention / t's and c's on their website. It's like talking to a brick wall. Don't know what to do. Maybe I'll email the CEO. I think I've seen his email address on this site. Any more advice for me? (I'll certainly continue written communication and will not ring them, though they keep on asking me to.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

After checking the T&Cs about whether the cap applies only to EU or is worldwide you should write to them again asking the question specifically , and also ask to which specific services they say the cap applies (your last post). Make sure they are contravening their own T&Cs before refusing to pay up. It might be wise to say that you will gladly pay what is reasonably due but that you are questioning the total amount they are asking. Ask for a detailed breakdown of the amount. Get it all in writing because you may wish to ask the Ombudsman for an adjudication when the 8 weeks are up and will need written evidence. Retain copies of the letters you send, this is important evidence that you have acted reasonably and made efforts to resolve the dispute with the supplier. Ask that letters they write in reply should have a full name signature so they can be held to account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...