Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with debt and Marston Group **Success**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If they do attend again then you do NOT have to let them into your home.

 

If the HCEO is prevented from making a levy on any of your possessions then he is powerless.

 

If you have anything lying round outside then move it NOW.

 

If you have a car then I would advise you move it well away - a good 10 minute walk if possible or into a neighbours garage.

 

He is allowed to force entry to any detached buildings you may have, garage, shed, greenhouse etc but more often than not do not bother.

 

You could get the Writ information by ringing the Enforcement Section at RCJ 020 7947 7772

or [email protected] ,

 

you will need the number Marstons have given you,

 

they should be able to tell you the history (timescales) behind it.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I live in a flat with a car park so there are a number of cars at any one time parked there, if they try to get access even to the garden I have a dog that will go mad at them, they will need to be very brave.

Do they have the right to find out which car is mine ie from the DVLA?

Edited by nuttyburd
add question
Link to post
Share on other sites

I live in a flat with a car park so there are a number of cars at any one time parked there, if they try to get access even to the garden I have a dog that will go mad at them, they will need to be very brave.

Do they have the right to find out which car is mine ie from the DVLA?

 

They should check a car with the dvla before seizing it, but as it costs £2.50 a pop, they would be unlikely to check 10 cars near a premises, just levy the nearest one and hope the debtor doesn't know any better·.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have found the letter left by the baliff with my son. I scanned it but was unable to upload it here as it made it too small, so here is what it said.

 

Claimant: Anglian

Defendant: Me

 

I have received a high court writ against you in respect of the above matter, made up as follows:-

 

Judgement Debt 500.00

Judgement costs 149.75

Execution costs 51.75

Interest to 4.70

Officers Fees 364.19

 

Total Levy £1050.19

 

In addition, interest will continue to acrue at 8% per annum on the full amount of the judgement Debt and costs, until payment in full.

 

A walking possession fee of 25p per day may also be charged where we go into possession of any goods.

 

In the event that you cannot pay my officer in full, in cash immediately, then he is required by law to formally seize sufficient of your goods to satisfy this debt.

 

Please be aware that we are required to enforce a writ without delay and, unless the debt is paid quickly, arrangements will be made to complete the Execution.

 

Payment, to be made by cash or cards to Marston Group Ltd

 

Quote ref on correspondence.

If no contact we will return with removal contractors

 

X XXXXXX (Tel number)

 

:!:

Edited by nuttyburd
removing name, I dont think I shouldve posted it
Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record I have read on this forum somewhere about Baliffs and HCEO's being registered to carry out a writ ect.

I cannot find the HCEO that served this letter on the register. does this help me at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record I have read on this forum somewhere about Baliffs and HCEO's being registered to carry out a writ ect.

I cannot find the HCEO that served this letter on the register. does this help me at all?

 

HCEO's are appointed by the Lord Chancellor and in turn they are allowed to employ anyone they like to carry out their orders. Although many also have a Bailiff Certificate it is not applicable in this circumstance.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have found the letter left by the baliff with my son. I scanned it but was unable to upload it here as it made it too small, so here is what it said.

 

Does it have a date on it anywhere - some thing like transferred by certificate from xxx County Court

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No. It appears exactly as I have typed above, the only thing Ive missed out is My name and address and ref number at the top. The only date is the date it was written.

The letter is typed but all the details ie my name etc the claimant and all the amounts are hand written.

 

When I received it I phoned the office as I was not happy with the details given to my son. I quried the amounts, in particular the officers fees and was told that the court had set the amounts when they issued the writ and there was nothing I could do about them. I was told all the details on the letter were set by the court that issued the writ. thats when I agreed a payment plan of £50 a month. which I am no longer paying.

 

I have filled in the letter you gave me a template for re: Data protection and will send it to them tomorrow.

Edited by nuttyburd
Link to post
Share on other sites

The way forward is to use the advice offered in Posts 13 & 16. Have you checked any details with Anglian as to why you appear to have both HCEO & DCA collecting on the same debt? Have you checked the age of the Writ yet as in Post 26.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Firstly thank you for all your help, I am feeling better about all this now and able to deal with it better.(with your help)

 

I have spoken to Anglian today. they have been very helpful, the DCA is for a more recent bill than the one marstons are dealing with,

 

I explained they I was willing to pay direct with them but would not pay the DCA and gave them my reasons why.

We have no made an arrangement for this debt and they have agreed to take it back from DCA. :wink:

 

Anglian have informed me that the warrent of execution was issued on 11.08.07 and it it the only one they are aware of.

they also confirmed Marstons have paid them some money (about half the amount I have paid) and that the amount outstanding on this debt is £472.46.

 

I have today sent via recorded delivery the SAR to Marstons and will fill out the forms you mentioned in posts 13 tomorrow and get them sent off.

 

Anglian did not know when the writ was issued only the warrant of execution. is this the same thing?

 

I could ring the enforcement office at RCJ as you suggested earlier but do not have the writ number.

the number Marstons gave me is the court claim number I beleive ( XQAXXXXX) and their reference number which has been on their letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anglian did not know when the writ was issued only the warrant of execution. is this the same thing? I could ring the enforcement office at RCJ as you suggested earlier but do not have the writ number. the number Marstons gave me is the court claim number I beleive ( XQAXXXXX) and their reference number which has been on their letters.

 

A Warrant of Execution is obtained when a CCJ awarded to the Claimant goes unpaid, the cost of this is £100 and this is added to your debt.

 

For it to be used you should have received a letter/phone call/visit from the County Court Bailiff.

 

This is an entirely separate process & application to that of a Writ of FiFa.

 

It does however seem strange that Anglian no nothing of this and do not seem to be aware of any Writ renewals as these are also charged to your debt.

 

I think at present wait and see what your SAR turns up but make sure you keep your doors & windows locked for the time being.

 

Unless Anglian are being very vague about this something is not quite right.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Firstly thank you for all your help, I am feeling better about all this now and able to deal with it better.(with your help)

 

I have spoken to Anglian today. they have been very helpful, the DCA is for a more recent bill than the one marstons are dealing with,

 

I explained they I was willing to pay direct with them but would not pay the DCA and gave them my reasons why.

We have no made an arrangement for this debt and they have agreed to take it back from DCA. :wink:

 

Anglian have informed me that the warrent of execution was issued on 11.08.07 and it it the only one they are aware of.

they also confirmed Marstons have paid them some money (about half the amount I have paid) and that the amount outstanding on this debt is £472.46.

 

I have today sent via recorded delivery the SAR to Marstons and will fill out the forms you mentioned in posts 13 tomorrow and get them sent off.

 

Anglian did not know when the writ was issued only the warrant of execution. is this the same thing?

 

I could ring the enforcement office at RCJ as you suggested earlier but do not have the writ number.

the number Marstons gave me is the court claim number I beleive ( XQAXXXXX) and their reference number which has been on their letters.

 

actually that scenario crossed my mind

 

sri i should of mentioned it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have today received a letter from Marstons stating that the execution has not been settled and they are giving me fair warning that an officer will attend on 28/11/12 to sieze and remove

it is imperative that someone is available to meet them so I should phone to make appointment or pay owing cost to avoid visit.

"We have previously advised you that the effect of the writ we hold is to bind your property in your hands from the time the writ is lodged until it is withdrawn. (Schedule 7 section 8 of courts Act 2003). Section 9 places a duty on us to seize sufficient of your property to satisfy the judgement debt and related costs in the absence of payment voluntarily."

 

It then goes on in bold to say "Please budget for an amount of approximately £400 for the first hour or part theerof and £250 per hour or part thereafter."

 

No goods have ever been levied at least I have had no notice of this. are HCEO's different to Baliffs in that they can seize and remove just like that?

 

I will make sure someone is home that day to ensure they do not get access, although I doubt they will come when they say I think or hope they are just trying to scare me to bring the account up to date.

 

Thanks again for your help with this.

 

Nutz.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does however seem strange that Anglian no nothing of this and do not seem to be aware of any Writ renewals as these are also charged to your debt.

 

I think at present wait and see what your SAR turns up but make sure you keep your doors & windows locked for the time being.

 

Unless Anglian are being very vague about this something is not quite right.

 

 

The person I spoke to at Anglian was very helpful and seemed to be very forthcoming with all the information I asked with regards to Marston, and this debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes indeed the help and advice I have been given has been great, Thank you all. I have filled in and sent off al the forms and the SAR as suggested, except the N244 as I do not understand what I need to put on this form or how to fill it in.

 

Nutz.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Most of it, am I right in thinking I am the defedant and Angliam the Claimant?

 

3.what order am I asking the court to make and why?

4. I dont have a draft of the order.

5. do I need a hearing?...The court in Northampton, Im in Essex, I wouldnt be able to get there.

7.What fixed trial date?

8.What level of judge?

9. Who should be served?

10. What information am I relying on?

 

Nutz x

Link to post
Share on other sites

N244 Form:

 

Name of Court - where CCJ was awarded

Claim No - CCJ number

Warrant No -

Claimants Name - name of Claimant as entered on CCJ

Defendants Name - name of Defendant as entered on CCJ - yourself

Date - when you filled this in

Q1 - put your name in here

Q2 - tick relevant box

Q3 - a brief description - you are applying for a Stay of Execution on the following grounds:

i - you have no means of paying the Fees demanded

ii - pending determination of a Variation Order

Q4 - tick no

Q5 - tick at a hearing

Q6 - leave blank

Q7 - leave blank unless relevant

Q8 - District Judge

Q9 - Claimant & Defendant & HCEO

Q10 - needs expansion of Q3 - better done on sheet(s) of paper with each point bulletted. Remember to copy Statement of Truth on to last sheet & sign + date. Tick statement of case on form and again sign + date

Q11 - fill your details in

 

As this is an application for a Stay of Execution it must be returned to the High Court or a County Court acting as a District Registry. The application is best taken in person to the Court and you need to explain the urgency for its submission - you are being hounded by a HCEO. The fee for this is £80 but if on certain Benefits or a low wage you may be exempt - see Form EX160a & c for details. If unsure of which Court to go to let me know the general area you live in & I'll look the choice of Courts up. Be back in the morning if any queries.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PT

 

Thank you for the above. I have taken the afternoon off work in order to fill this in and get it to the court today.

 

In question 10 should I state that I did not know about the warrent of execution untill april this year, that I beleive it to be out of date. should I say about the SAR. Should I explain the stress it is causing me. or keep it to the fact that I am having difficulty paying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q.10 is for expansion of why you need the Stay -

a - can't afford the fees - give them a breakdown of your Income & Expenditure that will prove you can only pay £X - if you are submitting a Variation Order then make sure it matches this.

b - applying for Variation - just need to put date & Court it has been submitted to.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to submit an N244 last year when The Sherriffs Office were hounding me.

 

The Judge was lovely, spoke of his annoyance that DCA's HCEO's and the like hardly ever bothered to turn up to hearings

 

- thanked me for having the decency to attend and wishing me luck, granted the stay.

 

It was a really positive experience in contrast with the bully boy tactics of the HCEO's.

 

I have since completely paid the debt off to the company I owed the money too, dealing only with them directly,

and have not given a penny to the Sherriffs Office who contacted me only once after I had been to court to demand payment of their extortionate fees

in a remarkably aggressive letter and then nothing since.

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to submit an N244 last year when The Sherriffs Office were hounding me. The Judge was lovely, spoke of his annoyance that DCA's HCEO's and the like hardly ever bothered to turn up to hearings - thanked me for having the decency to attend and wishing me luck, granted the stay.

It was a really positive experience in contrast with the bully boy tactics of the HCEO's.

I have since completely paid the debt off to the company I owed the money too, dealing only with them directly, and have not given a penny to the Sherriffs Office who contacted me only once after I had been to court to demand payment of their extortionate fees in a remarkably aggressive letter and then nothing since.

Good luck

 

V pleased to hear you had a good result, shows following the correct procedures works.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, glad it is sorted,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...