Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my council tax account was passed to the newlyn but i have cleared the councill tax account but battle with bailiff is going on they trying to charge £162.50 .

 

i covered my self by sending them proof that my car is private hire but they keep saying they still can clamp my car but can not take it .

i also told them not to visit my house as my wife has mental history and she is till seeking some counseling for it and they said we will visit tell your wife not to open the door

 

where before they was sending me the letters with both our names now they only start sending letters only stating my wife's name

only.

 

i am attaching recent letter they send me and in this they also said ( Goods maybe removed in your absence )

 

they never got levy on items as we never had them visit physically let them in or open the door for any bailiff so how can they say goods maybe removed in your absence .

 

please help me thanks

 

newlynabsence.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

money all paid to the council and just bailiff fees owing?

 

The most they can charge with no levy is £24.50 first visit and £18.00 second visit

 

they cant levy on goods just to cover there fees the liability order/warrant is satisfied

 

Bailiffs are relying on fear and intimidation thinking you will pay up

 

Get on to local MP and to council to get a breakdown of there agents fees

 

That seams a standard letter

 

Bailiffs on to a looser no levy they cant take car

 

they have no levy no right of entry

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send this letter to Newlyn by recorded delivery

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were certificatedlink3.gif at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject access requestlink3.gif under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would appear that the Local MP should be directed to this site and the others

 

Clearly he does not know what bailiffs can and cant charge and should have a read up on things

 

try the breakdown from the bailiffs

there is no warrant so they can do very little to get there money before giving up

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does your wife have a CPN or similar? Did the Bailiff leave you a Notice of Seizure?

 

I don't know how this notice of seizure looks like or it's wording I only have letter through post by newlyn and one letter was in red color and all the crap about their action

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how this notice of seizure looks like or it's wording I only have letter through post by newlyn and one letter was in red color and all the crap about their action

 

 

have a look at the form 7 in this link it shows what notice of seizure

looks like

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1988/2050/schedule/2/made

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are trying to charge you £162-50 they must have levy on some of your possessions - you mention a car in your original post. A Bailiff is allowed to charge £24-50 for his 1st Visit to you & £18-00 for his 2nd - providing he has not made a levy on your goods. If this has been charged then that leaves £120 unaccounted for. It is all the more urgent you send off for the breakdown of fees as said in Post 4, this best done initially by email followed by a copy in the post.

 

If they have made a levy on anything it is a legal requirement they leave you a Notice of Seizure - also called a Form 7 because that is its number. This is usually an A4 sheet listing the goods seized and on the reverse it should have a list of what they have charged.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I did not revieved any form 7

 

I did talk to the the guy

the appointed bailif that came and visited my house my wife was not home so he left letter with the sum on it and his name

 

I did search his name on bailiff data base but he was not bailiff

 

I asked him why he came

he said he came to claim the money and I told him not to come when I am not home as my wife's depression history

 

he told me to tell my wife not to open door as he will keep calling at my house.

 

I warned him that he will be breaking law by doing that and I also said I got proof of signiture post that I have provided the documents to your office

which they never send me acknowledge so far it's been over month.

 

He than asked me what time I am home so he can come and collect money

 

I said you not getting any money or any access to house so don't bother

 

he than said he will come and clamp my car

I said up to you but

 

I have provided the proof of car

it is work car and I do my earning than

 

he told me that he can clamp it but can not twoe the car away

and keep it clamped until I pay the money .

 

Since I have talked to him I have recived 2 letter first my name and my wife's together

as shows on council tax second letter today with only my wife's name as I posted in perivoius post

 

.thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am on stage 2 of council complain procedure as they are not upholding my complain again now i am going to local ombudsman

 

mpletter.png

 

Surprise, surprise. The Minister of State responsible for the certification of bailiffs comes out with crap like this. He really does need to invest in a copy of John Kruse's book, as I have. Just waiting for it to be delivered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they will claim a levy on your motor, if it is contract hire then it cannot be levied or seized, as it belongs to the finance company. Once they have responded to the Acme letter, if they have levied the car it can be challenged.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they will claim a levy on your motor, if it is contract hire then it cannot be levied or seized, as it belongs to the finance company. Once they have responded to the Acme letter, if they have levied the car it can be challenged.

 

the car is private hire

Link to post
Share on other sites

the car is private hire

 

Then it belongs to the hire company and cannot be either levied on or seized. Make sure the bailiff is served with a photocopy of the hire document. This will kill his pig, but if he then tries to levy on or seize it, he will be acting illegally from the outset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be wrong Old Bill, but when the OP says his car is private hire, he means it is a minicab. Probably why the bailiff says he can clamp it but not remove it. So a question to the original poster - does the car belong to you or does the minicab company own it? If it belongs to you, does the car have any outstanding HP on it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. Does the vehicle have a Private Hire plate on it? If so, it is used for business purposes and the OP's livelihood and the bailiff will be on a sticky wicket if they try to levy on or seize it.. If it is subject to finance, it is third party property and, therefore, cannot be levied on or seized.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt for the council tax has been cleared then, im sure when I say this, that the bailiff cannot levy for his fee's only.

 

However the council must give you verification that your debt have been discharged with them. They can take the bailiff fee's out of the payment that you have made, which would leave the debt still owing.

 

I would offer or pay the bailiff for the two visits, which are owed. The levy on the vehicle can then be queried. No lawful levy, then no fee above the visit fee's.

 

You stated that the bailiff wasnt a bailiff, did you mean that he wasnt a certificated bailiff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. Does the vehicle have a Private Hire plate on it? If so, it is used for business purposes and the OP's livelihood and the bailiff will be on a sticky wicket if they try to levy on or seize it.. If it is subject to finance, it is third party property and, therefore, cannot be levied on or seized.

Car got private hire plates and I have send the documents by recorded delevery to newlyn and also I have updates council office with the documents and the car is on my name .i called citizen advice beru they asked me to call free debt help line and they told me that bailiff are not able to clamp the car but try to keep the car out of their sight .thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt for the council tax has been cleared then, im sure when I say this, that the bailiff cannot levy for his fee's only.

 

However the council must give you verification that your debt have been discharged with them. They can take the bailiff fee's out of the payment that you have made, which would leave the debt still owing.

 

I would offer or pay the bailiff for the two visits, which are owed. The levy on the vehicle can then be queried. No lawful levy, then no fee above the visit fee's.

 

You stated that the bailiff wasnt a bailiff, did you mean that he wasnt a certificated bailiff.

Bailiff is refusing to accept my first fee payment .the name of the guy who visited me third time is not listed on the bailiffs data . I also offered council that I am willing to pay only one first payment to newlyn now the newlyn is adding more charges my fear is if council pays it and than will start chasing me for what will I do than anyone can highlight me on this issue please thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Newlyns cannot add any further charges without being able to prove they have lawfully incurred them. You could try threatening to have their fees submitted for Formal Determination. In layman's terms, when bailiff fees are subject to a Formal Determination, a County Court Registrar scrutinises the fees and, where it is found fees are excessive or not in accordance with legislation, they are disallowed. Also, the Registrar has the power to report a bailiff to their certificating court if what the Registrar finds brings into question the bailiff's fitness to hold a bailiff certificate. This is contained in the Distress for Rent Rules 1988.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...