Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Opus was Citi sold to 1st Credit - Now a default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2564 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

so the new owner have failed your CCA request?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

sent the failure to comply letter

 

stop payments

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

which year does your agreement with citi date from?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not still on your CRA file is it?

 

that might tell you the date you took it out

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Opus have a habit of sending out t&cs that predate your agreement, and are therefore not true copies.

 

 

Have a look at your original letter says t&cs from 1 11.2006

 

 

you need to find out as DX says from your cra file

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well that blows them right out the water then

 

those doc you post mention £12 PENALTY fees

and a date of 2010 on one set

 

the £12 fees did not come in until after the OFT bank charges investigation

 

so those T&C's etc are from AFTER 2006

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I miss read the date of your cra file

 

2007 not 2004!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

been having another look at this and its interesting.

 

Your cra file says started 18/04/2007,

Opus say your ac is 0025 citi & bmibaby cards starting 1/11/2006,

and of most interest in your t&cs under 22 your right to cancel it says

"you can cancel by sending written notice to AUDI Card etc"

not a phrase I would associate with bmibaby t&cs.

 

At the moment follow as dx has said.

 

If it were me I think I would also send a SAR request to citi to establish that ac opening date.

 

It could be of much help to you in future if you could establish that it was opened prior to 6/04/2007

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your eagle-eyed look at my situation. I hadn't spotted Audi!!

 

Out of the blue I received what I presume 1St credit consider be a reply to my CCA request.

 

They have supplied a letter from Opus cards replying to my complaint that they were failing to stick to the agreed payment plan.

 

I intend to send the non-compliance to a CCA request letter next, unless someone suggests otherwise.

 

I will also SAR Citigards

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By way of a light update.

 

I have received a second letter from 1st Crud enclosing what they call a copy of my original agreement and at the time of the default.

 

Neither contain the required information.

 

In fact pages are missing and they are complete rubbish.

 

No statement etc etc.

 

The accompanying letter from their collections department, suggests I contact them to discuss the matter.

 

Well they can reply to my non compliance letter first.

 

They should have supplied the CCA by the 1st August, so they are three months late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ist Crud have now sent a letter acknowledging my complaint and outlining their complaints process. they have also deleted from credit file any trace of this account.

 

CCA request to Citi cards has been answered by Opus who returned the Postal order as it was made payable to Citi. What should I do now please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no SAR to Citi Cards not cca request, ac remains in dispute 1st Crud until they produce a compliant reply to your cca request

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have now had a Final Response from 1st Crud dated 4th December.

 

They acknowledge my CCA request of 26th July and go on to say that

 

they had to ask Opus for the information and they are not responsible for the delay in replying.

 

They then state what they say is a true copy and that is what they have supplied

- but it was incomplete with pages missing !!

 

They also acknowledge that the statement was omitted and include a summary in the letter.

 

They close by writing that they have now complied with the CCA request and hope that the matter has been resolved.

 

How can this be compliant when they haven't complied by the due date

and what they have sent is incomplete??

Any thoughts please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the stuff up...

 

how about the sar ?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just scanned and uploaded what 1st Credit sent as a true copy of my agreement.

 

 

As you will see they have only included alternate pages.

 

 

Therefore I could do with some help please on what my next course of action should be.

 

Thanks

 

Having trouble uploading two scans but will try again

Edited by manxie
Trouble uploading files
Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have done the sar regardless of the cca outcome ideally.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

still no signed cca too.

 

anyone could have made those and inserted your address

 

as its been sold

 

I think that speaks volumes upon what citi thought their chances were

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have sar'd them last novmber

 

information gathering is the key here

 

PROVE things rather than speculate.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...