Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your registration number is still showing (third line below the picture)
    • Hi I took rooftop Mortgages to the County Court a couple of years ago asking them to produce the original mortgage deed which they did not it was just a copy the judge  referred me to the Chantry Court.  I pulled out because my friend stop advising me. I have now found evidence that Rooftop sold its mortgages for 200,000,000 to Farringdon No2 PLC plc I am now in the process of going back to the County Court if any can help please contact me
    • 1 Date of the infringement 14 Oct 2020 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 19 Oct 2020 3 Date received 20 Oct 2020 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Mentions "Made under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012", but doesn't mention schedule 4 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Photo of back of vehicle, showing number plate 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? UKCPS 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Gateway House Piccadilly 9. For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.IAS (IPC)   I appreciate this has been asked several times already, but commentators in previous threads seem to suggest that a No Stopping Parking Charge is de facto illegal, due to a 10 minute allowable period, but the recent case of VCS v Ward (attached) shows that this is not the case, and that de minimis non curat lex is not a valid defence.   Any suggestions or advice? ukcps redact.pdf VCS v Ward - ridiculous and wrong Appeal Judgment (1).pdf
    • We believe this firm has been providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation. Find out why to be especially wary of dealing with this unauthorised firm and how to protect yourself from scammers. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Sigma SPV1 Ltd court claim form for M & S store/credit card***Discontinued**


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2754 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello Cleo,

 

They used Fenton cooper and then Rockwell on me. One little letter should send them packing;).

 

Do indeed write to them and ask them to liase with M&S regarding the legally disputed account and inform them that you will retain all of their nasty correspondence for your harassment file. Also tell them to remove all of your personal data from their data bases and you require written confirmation of this.

 

I would also write to M&S and tell them they are breaching the data protection act by passing your personal data to 3rd parties and you will hold them responsible for this harassment.

 

They know exactly what little game they are up to:rolleyes: I would imagine that you are only one of many of their disputes they have and they are trying to scare with the use of the dca, and many will fold and pay up money that they can ill afford when they get treating letter of a dca.

What I find so unbelievable is that M & S sent me some documentation in response to my CCA request. They also sent reverse document to another M & S customer which is exactly the same - same postmark , same identifying marks. I have asked for the original to be made available and they have not even acknowledged this in their reply - completely evaded the issue. Thanks I will write asap - I would be interested to see if anyone else has had the same document ???

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 519
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

M&S tend to grab anything that looks sortof maybe suitable, and send it off in the hope that people won't notice.

 

This rather suggests that they only have copies, and have no idea what copy goes with which Customer.

 

Excellent, just the sort of banker we like...utterly clueless.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now had another leter from Yvonne Sneddon basically that once and for LL THE ACCOUNT IS NOT IN DISPUTE - WE HAVE NOT PROVIDED THEM WITH EVIDENCE OF THIS ETC ETC ETC.......

 

They wrote saying also that original terms and conditions were unavailable but the fact that we signed them at the beginning is enough - they still don't admit to terminating the account and keep getting letters from Blair Oliver Scott.

 

I despair!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

They sent a DN dated 12th December - giving me until 26th December (boxing day) so invalid DN as I understand it - then have put in writing TWICE that agreement is terminated. They have then denied in writing that agreement is terminated???????

 

Forgive my ignorance but what is a repudiation please

 

I have quoted Woodchester v Swayne to them in my correspondence but they still continue to process the account adding interest and charges so the arrears are getting more each month, but I understand it is the arrears at the time of default notice that have to be recovered???

 

Would you write again using the word repudiation - they just don't listen!!!!

 

Try Unlawful termination :grin:

 

Have now had another leter from Yvonne Sneddon basically that once and for LL THE ACCOUNT IS NOT IN DISPUTE - WE HAVE NOT PROVIDED THEM WITH EVIDENCE OF THIS ETC ETC ETC.......

 

They wrote saying also that original terms and conditions were unavailable but the fact that we signed them at the beginning is enough - they still don't admit to terminating the account and keep getting letters from Blair Oliver Scott.

 

I despair!!!

 

If you have photocopied the letters of termination to them, then I think that is all you can really do, short of taking THEM to court ?

 

I am wondering if this is a scenario the FOS would get involved with. Have you spoken to Trading Standards, see what they have to say. It is absolutely bizarre that you have in your possession letters of termination, yet, both BLair Oliver and BOS are denying the existence of same. :confused:

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Have now had another leter from Yvonne Sneddon basically that once and for LL THE ACCOUNT IS NOT IN DISPUTE - WE HAVE NOT PROVIDED THEM WITH EVIDENCE OF THIS ETC ETC ETC.......

 

They wrote saying also that original terms and conditions were unavailable but the fact that we signed them at the beginning is enough - they still don't admit to terminating the account and keep getting letters from Blair Oliver Scott.

 

I despair!!!

 

 

Hi Cleo:) same old cr*p letters they keep sending. :rolleyes:

 

Milly XX

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Cleo!

 

Thanks for the PM.

 

I would just send Rockwell a letter saying you acknowledge their response, and you have noted the fact that they are not willing to respond to a Statutory s78(1) Request. This confirms they have no rights to demand any payment from you, nor to make further contact with you on behalf of M&S.

 

You may like to suggest that they acquaint themselves with The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and s78(6) of The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Also send them a copy of this:

 

OFT imposes requirements on Mackenzie Hall to improve handling of disputed debts

 

...just to make it clear what the implications of their s78(1) Refusal are, and how the OFT expects the holder of a Consumer Credit Licence to conduct themselves when handling disputed Agreements.

 

Close by saying the alleged Agreement is in very clear dispute and, until such time as they furnish you with an enforceable Agreement, you will not converse with them any further.

 

In the light of the above, any further demands for Payment by them will be reported to The Office of Fair Trading (don't bother with FOS, they are a complete waste of space), and will be regarded as harassment.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

preference account was passed to IQOR - had several letters from them but they must have passed the account back after I wrote to them - have now had similar letter from Wescot - here we go again!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cleo, have you sent the the complaint to the OFT ?

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/50-complaint-in-respect-of-dca-threat-re-expired-debt/101-complaint-in-respect-of-invalid-cca-agreement

 

Amend the letter to suit and enclose a copy of the CCA if you have it or just say that you dont have a copy if you havent....

 

Then send a copy of the OFT letter and a covering letter to the DCA who is flavour of the day, saying..

 

Dear Sirs,

 

This account is and has been in dispute with the original creditor and subsequent (50) DCAs to whom they have been passing this account.

 

I would adivse you that I am now sending complaints to the OFT in respect of each DCA who has made attempts to collect or attempts to do so in the future whilst it is in dispute.

 

Please find a copy of the letter I am sending to the OFT today in respect of your letter dated (whenever).

 

Yours faithfully.. fed up and truly p*ssed off.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Cleo, have you sent the the complaint to the OFT ?

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/50-complaint-in-respect-of-dca-threat-re-expired-debt/101-complaint-in-respect-of-invalid-cca-agreement

 

Amend the letter to suit and enclose a copy of the CCA if you have it or just say that you dont have a copy if you havent....

 

Then send a copy of the OFT letter and a covering letter to the DCA who is flavour of the day, saying..

 

Dear Sirs,

 

This account is and has been in dispute with the original creditor and subsequent (50) DCAs to whom they have been passing this account.

 

I would adivse you that I am now sending complaints to the OFT in respect of each DCA who has made attempts to collect or attempts to do so in the future whilst it is in dispute.

 

Please find a copy of the letter I am sending to the OFT today in respect of your letter dated (whenever).

 

Yours faithfully.. fed up and truly p*ssed off.

many thanks - I went back through all the paperwork and BOTH my BOS agreements have definitely been terminated in writing. I have found strength in this site

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Hello Cleo!

 

Thanks for the PM.

 

I would just send Rockwell a letter saying you acknowledge their response, and you have noted the fact that they are not willing to respond to a Statutory s78(1) Request. This confirms they have no rights to demand any payment from you, nor to make further contact with you on behalf of M&S.

 

You may like to suggest that they acquaint themselves with The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and s78(6) of The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Also send them a copy of this:

 

OFT imposes requirements on Mackenzie Hall to improve handling of disputed debts

 

...just to make it clear what the implications of their s78(1) Refusal are, and how the OFT expects the holder of a Consumer Credit Licence to conduct themselves when handling disputed Agreements.

 

Close by saying the alleged Agreement is in very clear dispute and, until such time as they furnish you with an enforceable Agreement, you will not converse with them any further.

 

In the light of the above, any further demands for Payment by them will be reported to The Office of Fair Trading (don't bother with FOS, they are a complete waste of space), and will be regarded as harassment.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Well I received letter from Rockwell today :

 

"We can confirm that we are no longer dealing with this matter, and our files have now been closed.

THANKS!!!!!to all for help -

 

I know it's not the end of it but at least I have fended them off with help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one Cleo, with good support from BRW

 

:D:cool:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice one Cleo, with good support from BRW

 

:D:cool:

I have found BRW (and others) terrific support.

 

What gets me is Rockwell went from Being swayed by M & S to pester us to completely backing off. I did not "show my hand" fully in the letter but made Rockwell aware of an issue that "M & S are well aware of..." as I put it in my letter.

many thanks again (until the next time!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Cleo, have you sent the the complaint to the OFT ?

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/50-complaint-in-respect-of-dca-threat-re-expired-debt/101-complaint-in-respect-of-invalid-cca-agreement

 

Amend the letter to suit and enclose a copy of the CCA if you have it or just say that you dont have a copy if you havent....

 

Then send a copy of the OFT letter and a covering letter to the DCA who is flavour of the day, saying..

 

Dear Sirs,

 

This account is and has been in dispute with the original creditor and subsequent (50) DCAs to whom they have been passing this account.

 

I would adivse you that I am now sending complaints to the OFT in respect of each DCA who has made attempts to collect or attempts to do so in the future whilst it is in dispute.

 

Please find a copy of the letter I am sending to the OFT today in respect of your letter dated (whenever).

 

Yours faithfully.. fed up and truly p*ssed off.

Hi all - am getting paperwork all sorted - need to contact FOS now. However TODAY I have now received this from Blair Oliver Scott

 

NOTICE OF INTENDED COURT ACTION:

 

SUM CLAIMED XXXX DUE BY 26/06/09 (YESTERDAY)

 

FORMAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT OUR CLIENT HAS INSTRUCTED US TO COMMENCE COURT PROCEEDINGS WITHOUT DELAY. PAPERS ARE NOW BEING PREPARED FOR COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION THROUGH YOUR LOCAL COURT TO SEEK A JUDGMENT AGAINST YOU.

IF YOU RE A HOMEOWNER......

 

YOU MUST MAKE A PAYMENT TO STOP ACTION BEING TAKEN.....

 

I am loathe to make a payment as BOS have terminated this agreement after a dodgy DN. What is the next step for me please ????? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go cleo, The letter below, suitably amended should sort them out. :D The bits highlighted in blue are those you need to amend ie date and the specific threats they have made. If it is an illegible document you have then amend the letter to reflect that. Post recorded delivery minimum.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-1800199.html

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re :

 

THIS IS A REQUEST UNDER THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES.

PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE.

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated 23rd October, this was received on 30th October 2008.

 

You have indicated that

 

a) You are giving Formal Notice that your client has instructed you to commence court proceedings against me without delay and

b) Papers are now being prepared for commencement of action through my local court to seek a judgement against me.

 

I am sure that you are aware that I have long since requested from your client, under both the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (The Act) and the Data Protection Act 1998, a copy of the agreement to which both you and your client allege I am a signatory. To date this has not been provided to me and whilst I appreciate your client has endeavoured to persuade me that the provision of a copy of an application form is sufficient to discharge your client from further obligations under section 78 of the Act. Likewise I too have explained that the mere provision of a copy of an application form is not a legally permissable substitute for the provision of a true copy of the executed agreement as required under section 78 of the Act and as prescribed by Regulation 3 Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983.

 

I am sure you are also aware that under section 78(6) of the Act, whilst a creditor is in default of a request made under sub-section (1) they may not enforce the agreement.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing and your client's persistent, unexplained and willful refusal to supply a copy of the executed agreement in accordance with its obligations (the permitted ommisions under Regulation 3(2) excepted), your client has made plain its intention to begin legal proceedings against me. In consequence this matter may now be treated as one which is subject to the control of the Civil Procedure Rules.

 

Take notice therefore that under CPR Practice Direction - Protocols paragraph 4.6(a) and (d), I request that you supply copies of the following documents:

 

[1] A true copy of the executed credit agreement incorporating prescribed notices, terms and conditions applicable at the time the agreement was executed and

[2] Any further or subsequent notices, terms and conditions relied upon.

 

Please note that my request under the Practice Direction is not a request for production within the confines of the Act and Regulations but rather, it is for a copy of the executed agreement, including signatures and all such other notices, terms and conditions as will be relied upon in the event that your client shall begin a claim.

 

A copy of the documents I have requested should be supplied to me within 14 days and you are urged not to begin proceedings for a period of not less than 14 days following the supply of those documents to me.

 

Should your client elect to ignore my request under the Practice Direction and commence proceedings, it is likely that I shall repeat my request for the provision of documents under CPR 31.14. In the event that your client should fail to comply with my CPR 31.14 request, I will not hesitate in making an application to the court for an order that further proceedings upon the claim be stayed pending provision of the requisite documents, in the course of which application I will of course refer to this and previous requests for the provision of copy documents.

 

I look forward to hearing from you within the time stated.

 

Yours faithfully,

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As usual, I am catching up with threads over my coffee before having to dash off to do something, so this is just a quickie.

 

But ... I think I should flag up the Practice Direction reference is now superseded by the recently introduced Practice Direction on Pre Action Conduct.

 

You are still entitled to ask for documents but the reference will be different.

 

The Practice Direction will be on the MoJ website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Citizen B and Viscount Stair. Is there a limit to how long they have to send me the document - am I right in understanding that should it be over £10k they have to provide them within 7 days? I also need to clarify how I would stand costs wise?

 

sorry for all the questions but this is my first time.

 

Incidentally I have it in writing from Bank of Scotland that the original terms and conditions are not available - that they have not terminated.

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites
Here you go cleo, The letter below, suitably amended should sort them out. :D The bits highlighted in blue are those you need to amend ie date and the specific threats they have made. If it is an illegible document you have then amend the letter to reflect that. Post recorded delivery minimum.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-1800199.html

 

Hi - before I prepare the letter - what is the correct Practice Direction part to quote (see viscount stairs post on this thread)

thanks

cleo

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try and find out what VS has referred to. BRB:D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cleo, TBH, I have had a looksee and I cant really work out what has been replaced .. by what and where. So I am afraid you will either have to rely on VS coming back and explaining further.. or not send the letter at all.

 

My apologies. x20 had drafted that letter so all the references were correct at the time. I will have to stop referring to it. :(

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

PRACTICE DIRECTION – PRE-ACTION CONDUCT - Ministry of Justice

 

The new Practice Direction came into force on 6 April this year. Annex A sets out a procedure to be followed.

 

Refer to Annex A, paragraphs 2.2(1) and 4.2(7). Also refer to paragraph 4.4(5) of the main PD and to paras 4.5 and 4.6.

 

BoS might argue that Annex A does not apply because it is a simple debt action subject to a statutory procedure but your counter to that is that they are on notice that there is a dispute and that they have failed to follow the statutory procedure.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Gotta go again but hope to be back in later.

Link to post
Share on other sites
PRACTICE DIRECTION – PRE-ACTION CONDUCT - Ministry of Justice

 

The new Practice Direction came into force on 6 April this year. Annex A sets out a procedure to be followed.

 

Refer to Annex A, paragraphs 2.2(1) and 4.2(7). Also refer to paragraph 4.4(5) of the main PD and to paras 4.5 and 4.6.

 

BoS might argue that Annex A does not apply because it is a simple debt action subject to a statutory procedure but your counter to that is that they are on notice that there is a dispute and that they have failed to follow the statutory procedure.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Gotta go again but hope to be back in later.

 

Soooooooooo, should this sentence

 

Take notice therefore that under CPR Practice Direction - Protocols paragraph 4.6(a) and (d), I request that you supply copies of the following documents:

 

be replaced with

 

 

 

Examples of non-compliance

 

4.4

 

 

The court may decide that there has been a failure of compliance by a party because, for example, that party has –

 

(1) not provided sufficient information to enable the other party to understand the issues;

 

 

(2) not acted within a time limit set out in a relevant pre-action protocol, or, where no specific time limit applies, within a reasonable period;

 

 

(3) unreasonably refused to consider ADR (paragraph 8 in Part III of this Practice Direction and the pre-action protocols all contain similar provisions about ADR); or

 

 

(4) without good reason, not disclosed documents requested to be disclosed.

 

 

 

Thanks

 

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Soooooooooo, should this sentence

 

 

be replaced with

 

 

 

Thanks

 

 

I am confused - and would appreciate if this could be clarified as think I should sent a letter

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...