Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As I recall the only thing you tried telling us was based on a quote that you selectively edited by Lord James of Blackheath. You misrepresented it as a statement of fact when it was actually a question which was laughed at by his peers in the House of Lords.  We told you it was garbage, you asked us to prove it and we did.   Remember?
    • you need to realise that for every person that does come to CAG and register and tell their story...there are poss 10'000 that don't but search the interweb whereby threads that are here pop up relating to like issues they are searching upon.   Most CAG siteteam and many other registered Caggers give advice that bears this in mind and post information which not only informs the starter of a thread upon what to do, but also takes into consideration the readers from the interweb that also read the relevant advice given that might not be brave enough to register and fess up.   to that end, there is very little alternative than to appear to give 'grief' [you deserve it - tough] to a cagger should certain previous advice not have been followed.....yours is a very classic case of such. hey I've found a backdoor CCJ.   to put it bluntly, had you have followed such previous advice, you most certainly would not be in the situation you are in here now.. .so by example, not giving you grief, for future readers...………..   ...never ever move without informing a debt owner of a move of address on any consumer debt that you last used or paid within the last say 7yrs. your credit file is a major key to ascertaining that information.... .but don't just read this advice come to the consumeractiongroup.co.uk website and let us help.   lecture over... what can you do..or more importantly....what can a claimant do now they have a default forthwith judgement against you. well we can't guess.... they might simply ignore it as 1000's of people with CCJ's find out..but it becomes an issue should you wish to say get a mortgage, remortgage or further credit.   i'm not going to enter into any of that here...that's for the reader to start a thread here and seek advice on their individual situation specific to them as you have done....   so...  bearing the all of the above in mind...over to you with regard to this backdoor CCJ.   as for the other debts that you didn't action before...go read your old thread and action what appropriate advice is given there for each type of debt that has been given should you wish to avoid any further backdoor CCJ's.   dx                    
    • hello my very good helpful friend. I am afraid to say that i did not. As i did not realise the relevance of it.   Should i be doing this right now of anyone on my credit file ?   Plz don't give me grief if u have already advised me...   do i do the ccs request now to everybody in that thread ?    
    • aha busted and stupid ...no wonder you've got mixed information here. never trust anything they say ..they have a very bad reputation for stating the truth.   now can you go get your credit file please..   there are cases whereby a council on historic CTAX debts do go for a county court CCJ, but a liability order from a magistrates court has far more clout legally than a county court CCJ and i've never heard of a court sending a bailiff out for 'multiple' CCJ collection.   me thinks he is pulling the wool here a bit and has looked at your credit file and seen CCJ's too so thought he'd chance his arm and use those as further leverage.   don't worry about the sat visit simply ignore do not answer the door if he appears. your task is too gather data at present.   credit file please..        
  • Our picks

westfield

contacting the benefits agency

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2579 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi can anyone give me advice.

Yesterday my esa did not get paid. I phoned and was told i would get a call back by 5 and my file said "decision overdue" I won my tribunal several months ago was placed in the wrag but asked for that to be reconsidered,seen someone a JC+ once about 3 weeks ago. At 4.45 i called again and was told to wait till 5. At 5 i called again to be told wellingborough was closed and i would get a call by 10 this morning. Guess what ,no call. Now called again and still no answer and no money. They just say they are having problems. Are thete shortcuts or people i can complain to

 

THANKS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hoping im right in saying, you won an appeal to the tribune , you were placed in wrag, you asked for a reconsideration of wrag.

 

Dont know if they are able to change a tribunal decision, unless an appeal to the Upper Tier on a point of law is successful.

 

Is DWP computer system expecting a 'fit' note, no fit note no payment.

 

Complaints are found here:

 

https://www.gov.uk/complain-jobcentre-plus

 

Sorry for the limited reply , hope someone alse can post more help for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if you win at Tribunal you can only challenge the decision by going to upper tribunal on a point of law.

 

Though you can ask the DWP to reassess you based on a worsening condition, as the Tribunal can only look at your condition on the day of your WCA decision.


We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for not replying but for some reason i did not get the emails. I finally got my payment sorted. Seems two different IT systems in use.

As for my appeal,well i was given 15 points but not placed in a group. The dwp placed me in wrag. I asked them to reconsider and apparently that is still in the system. I get conflicting information

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure that to get to be put into support group, youll need to satisfy any of the descriptors that are for support group. I cant say which ones they are, youll have to look at the tribunal report to see what they say on what you scored points on. Sorry i cant say more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I believe i did but it is open to interpretation. I got 9 points on that descriptor which said majority of the time. That is why i am asking them to look at it again. It has been a total farce. My claim had to be rebuilt so i went 8 weeks having to make repeated calls to get my money and told lies and more lies with the odd person who helped. I am lucky because i have family i can lean on but you can understand why people cause trouble at the jc+ when you were due on Tuesday and you get to Friday with no money or prospect of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.tameside.gov.uk/esa/lcwra

 

You need to satisfy one of these descriptors to get into the support group. If you are challenging a Tribunal decision, you need to get a statement of reasons and show they made an error of law.


We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi well i got 9 points for No11st it is not absolutely clear

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi well i got 9 points for No11st it is not absolutely clear

 

You need to score 15 on that to be in the support group.


We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You need to score 15 on that to be in the support group.

 

Well, the SG descriptors don't work on the basis of points, though. If you satisfy one of them, you will be placed in the SG. You need to prove LCWRA, as opposed to LCW.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did get the impression that although there were some scores that automatically put you in the support group but otherwise it was down to a decision maker. Even within the dwp there is confusion. Thanks for the replies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, the SG descriptors don't work on the basis of points, though. If you satisfy one of them, you will be placed in the SG. You need to prove LCWRA, as opposed to LCW.

 

Yes I understand that - I was pointing out that the support group descriptor is the same as the 15 point descriptor. If he hasn't scored on the 15 point descriptor then he won't meet the support group descriptor.


We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I understand that - I was pointing out that the support group descriptor is the same as the 15 point descriptor. If he hasn't scored on the 15 point descriptor then he won't meet the support group descriptor.

 

Ah, I see. Apologies.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ah, I see. Apologies.

 

No problem, sometimes I'm not always as clear as maybe I should be.


We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

erm, somewhere in my brain i seem to remember that a lower amount of points is needed for mental health somewhere like 8 . please forgive me if im wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
erm, somewhere in my brain i seem to remember that a lower amount of points is needed for mental health somewhere like 8 . please forgive me if im wrong

 

For IB it was. It's 15 whether you have a mental or physical health condition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For IB it was. It's 15 whether you have a mental or physical health condition.

 

Correct - you need 15 in either case. Or, of course, a combination of physical and mental health issues that scores 15 points would also be fine.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...