Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • anotheruser0000
      Parking Fee Paid But Input Incorrect VRN

      By anotheruser0000 · Posted

      Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN.  
    • dx100uk
      Parking Fee Paid But Input Incorrect VRN

      By dx100uk · Posted

      you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • anotheruser0000
      Highview/DCB(L) ANPR PCN - Letter of Claim - Now Claimform - overstay - Riverside Retail Park in Norwich, Norfolk.

      By anotheruser0000 · Posted

      Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • lookinforinfo
      Highview/DCB(L) ANPR PCN - Letter of Claim - Now Claimform - overstay - Riverside Retail Park in Norwich, Norfolk.

      By lookinforinfo · Posted

      Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • anotheruser0000
      Highview/DCB(L) ANPR PCN - Letter of Claim - Now Claimform - overstay - Riverside Retail Park in Norwich, Norfolk.

      By anotheruser0000 · Posted

      Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

contacting the benefits agency

westfield

By westfield
in Benefits and HMRC

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4172 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

westfield

westfield

Posted
Posted

Hi can anyone give me advice.

Yesterday my esa did not get paid. I phoned and was told i would get a call back by 5 and my file said "decision overdue" I won my tribunal several months ago was placed in the wrag but asked for that to be reconsidered,seen someone a JC+ once about 3 weeks ago. At 4.45 i called again and was told to wait till 5. At 5 i called again to be told wellingborough was closed and i would get a call by 10 this morning. Guess what ,no call. Now called again and still no answer and no money. They just say they are having problems. Are thete shortcuts or people i can complain to

 

THANKS

Link to post
Share on other sites
Zonker

Zonker

Posted
Posted

Hoping im right in saying, you won an appeal to the tribune , you were placed in wrag, you asked for a reconsideration of wrag.

 

Dont know if they are able to change a tribunal decision, unless an appeal to the Upper Tier on a point of law is successful.

 

Is DWP computer system expecting a 'fit' note, no fit note no payment.

 

Complaints are found here:

 

https://www.gov.uk/complain-jobcentre-plus

 

Sorry for the limited reply , hope someone alse can post more help for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
estellyn

estellyn

Posted
Posted

Yes if you win at Tribunal you can only challenge the decision by going to upper tribunal on a point of law.

 

Though you can ask the DWP to reassess you based on a worsening condition, as the Tribunal can only look at your condition on the day of your WCA decision.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites
westfield

westfield

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sorry for not replying but for some reason i did not get the emails. I finally got my payment sorted. Seems two different IT systems in use.

As for my appeal,well i was given 15 points but not placed in a group. The dwp placed me in wrag. I asked them to reconsider and apparently that is still in the system. I get conflicting information

Link to post
Share on other sites
Zonker

Zonker

Posted
Posted

Im pretty sure that to get to be put into support group, youll need to satisfy any of the descriptors that are for support group. I cant say which ones they are, youll have to look at the tribunal report to see what they say on what you scored points on. Sorry i cant say more

Link to post
Share on other sites
westfield

westfield

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks. I believe i did but it is open to interpretation. I got 9 points on that descriptor which said majority of the time. That is why i am asking them to look at it again. It has been a total farce. My claim had to be rebuilt so i went 8 weeks having to make repeated calls to get my money and told lies and more lies with the odd person who helped. I am lucky because i have family i can lean on but you can understand why people cause trouble at the jc+ when you were due on Tuesday and you get to Friday with no money or prospect of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
estellyn

estellyn

Posted
Posted

http://www.tameside.gov.uk/esa/lcwra

 

You need to satisfy one of these descriptors to get into the support group. If you are challenging a Tribunal decision, you need to get a statement of reasons and show they made an error of law.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites
antone

antone

Posted
Posted
You need to score 15 on that to be in the support group.

 

Well, the SG descriptors don't work on the basis of points, though. If you satisfy one of them, you will be placed in the SG. You need to prove LCWRA, as opposed to LCW.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
estellyn

estellyn

Posted
Posted
Well, the SG descriptors don't work on the basis of points, though. If you satisfy one of them, you will be placed in the SG. You need to prove LCWRA, as opposed to LCW.

 

Yes I understand that - I was pointing out that the support group descriptor is the same as the 15 point descriptor. If he hasn't scored on the 15 point descriptor then he won't meet the support group descriptor.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites
antone

antone

Posted
Posted
Yes I understand that - I was pointing out that the support group descriptor is the same as the 15 point descriptor. If he hasn't scored on the 15 point descriptor then he won't meet the support group descriptor.

 

Ah, I see. Apologies.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
antone

antone

Posted
Posted
For IB it was. It's 15 whether you have a mental or physical health condition.

 

Correct - you need 15 in either case. Or, of course, a combination of physical and mental health issues that scores 15 points would also be fine.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...