Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

section 21 notice to vacate


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys i have been given a letter from my landlord to vacate the premises by 9-02-2013.

 

My rent of 525 was due on the 10th of this month but on that date i only had £350 which i paid on the 10th and waited until today (13th) to pay the remaining £175 from housing benefit which was cleared in my account today. I have recently gone down to part time working hours and simply didnt have the money on the 10th.

 

We have been on time with our rent payments for the previous 12 months and find that his action is a bit harsh to say the least being that it was only 3 days late !

 

Is there a legal period of grace for paying rent? The letter states that i have caused him financial penalties (presumably his mortgage) and this is not acceptable. And failure to complete all payments will result in legal action!

 

Any advice please?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I firstly ask what sort of tenancy agreement you have? I've recently had to deal with a Section 21 in my own household and there are several different types of tenancy agreements such as an shorthold assured which may have some baring.

 

Traditionally, no there is no legal period of grace and in some tenancy's the landlord doesn't even need to give reason to serve notice. My ex-landlord told me he was kicking us out because he want to sell up and didn't. I found that out via miscommunication when a letting agent thought I was the landlord not the tenant and called me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi michelle,

 

it is just a monthly rolling contract at the minute our signed 6 month contract expired 12 months ago and weve just been paying monthly since then.

 

In all honest, I don't know much about those sort of tenancy's and what the law is regarding serving a section 21.

 

Can I advise this checker from Shelter?

 

http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/downloads_and_tools/eviction_checker

 

If you answer each question matching as close to their situation as possible then it will direct you to the right section of help. It might also be worth calling them. They helped me through each step of my 'experience' and boy was it an experience.

 

Sorry, I can't be more help than that, but as you can imagine, I don't want to give you incorrect information. Good luck though. I managed to force mine right through the courts and lumped all the costs to the landlord for the inconveinance, then sued him for the deposit after he over charged on a few repairs. Bet he wished he hadn't bothered afterwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your landlord doesn't need a reason to serve a s21 notice, albeit he has given you a reason - that you caused him financial hardship.

 

A landlord can serve a valid s21 notice so long as he has complied with the requirements to do so - which usually comes down to whether or not a deposit has been taken and placed in one of the government schemes. Did you pay a deposit? Have you received the required information from such?

 

You do not have to leave the property by the date the LL has specified, however if you do not and he has to take court action against you to gain a possession order, and then to instruct bailiffs, he will be able to get fixed costs awarded against you at the very least (and perhaps more if your tenancy agreement makes reference to the LL being able to recover costs for any legal action).

 

A validly served s21 notice has no defence in court - and possession will be awarded leaving the judge with discretion only as to how long it will be before the order can be executed (max 42 days).

 

For what it's worth I think the LL is being silly if his genuine reason for serving notice is due to your rent being 3 days late - however, I strongly suspect he is just using that as an excuse, though as I indicated above, he doesn't need one to serve a s21.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP. 10/2/13 is the first date LL could apply to the Court for a hearing to obtain a repo order. Given the likely Xmas backlog, the hearing date may be late Feb or March. Judge will normally allow a min 14 days max 42 from fate of granting, before Order can be executed by Bailiffs, possibly giiving you another month's grace. If you intend to leave voluntarily before 9/2/13 or Bailiff visit, you should send your written Notice to Quit to LL to be received (served) by 9th of month and it will expire on the 9th of following month that is the date you 'vacate' the Tenancy (SPT rules).

You can move out 21 days earlier, but you remain liable for rent and property security (burst water pipes etc) until NTQ expiry date of 9th.

Some may question the need to give NTQ after a s21 received, but s21 is only notice of prob intent to apply for a repo order at some time after s21 expiry. A LL cannot serve a NTQ on T!

If you leave before 9/2/13, the LL should really still proceed with Court repo to gain possession if he has not received a valid T NTQ. In which situation he is likely to ask for Court to award Court costs against you (£175).

If you wait for Bailiffs to be appointed this will add £100.

 

Can you answers Lea_HTH deposit question. Did you pay a deposit at any time and did you receive the 'required info' by 5 May 2012? Your answer is important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'required' or 'precribed info' is the stat info LL must have provided to current post Apr 2007 Ts since 5 May 12 as part of the deposit protection requirements. Such info need only to have been posted First Class to be deemed served 2 working days later. If Court decides stat required info not provided, then current s21 should be declared imvalid and LL would have to re-issue (min 2 month delay)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...